#rottenmango

The wind that blows you

Analyzing a historical podcast

Consuming History in the Digital Age

When I was young, I learned history through shows such as the History Channel and films that re-tell history in a lens digestible for children. These shows had an authoritative tone, seemed refined and thus felt trustworthy, embodying the broadcast era.

In modern times, new digital platforms such as social media (TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Podcasts and Documentaries on Disney Channel or Netflix, Ted Talk) have expanded the range of access to indulge in different content, educational or just simple cooking recipes or gossip.

In my daily life, I often encounter historical information or true crime cases while doom scrolling. In this genuine experience, storytelling remains at the heart of how we can connect with the past. Podcasts I preserve the tone or narrative style reminiscent of a grandmother's stories. The emotional engagement in historical podcast matters enormously because of the inherent sensitivity in historical topics.

Cooking dinner, listerning to murder

I am a big fan of listening to Ted Talks and crime podcasts while doing mundane activities like cooking. The history it speaks about emotionally resonate with me on a personal level. But I also find that the speed and algorithmic influence shape how and what I see online. These platforms offer quick consumption, a 60-second summary of an event that cannot capture nuance. These algorithms maximise not accuracy but trapping the viewers in a filter bubble for engagement. There is a high potential for misinformation that lurks around.

Educators must prepare their students to carefully and responsibly navigate this domain. If we teach critical habits such as questioning what we see online and what it's purpose might be, we can then analyze how these narratives can manipulate emotions. Audiences should practice lateral reading for the goal of transforming how we consume history online.

A Digital History Review

Rotten Mango Podcast, Episode 328: "The Killer Who Vlogged His Murder Plan For 8 Years"

Is this history? A Necessary Question

Before I begin my review, I will address the fundamental question: Does this episode, specifically, present historical content?

I argue that yes, it does. The Rotten Mango Episode 328: "The Killer Who Vlogged His Murder Plan For 8 Years", deals with a past event. It is the Peter Keller case, that unfolded in 2012. The source itself consults a variety of sources (news articles, the Keller video diaries, court records) and engages with a broader historical context (survivalist culture of early 2010s and the 2012 doomsday craze). It draws on both primary and secondary sources, provides citation for any evidence and claims, and most importantly, offers an interpretation of why such an event unfolded, illustrating historical practices.

As a consumer, I have creative liberty in my engagement. The production team presents the historical information in an entertaining way. Stephanie Soo's crime podcasts contain quality history, and I think this episode and many others, makes for a perfect artifact in analyzing how millions of people encounter history today.

The Episode

This episode presents the 2012 case of Peter Keller, a Washington survivalist who murdered his wife Lynette and daughter Kaylene before fleeing into a bunker, he spent 8 years carving in the mountains. Soo argues that he was a raging narcissist who viewed his family, simply as an extension of himself, noting that his video diaries capture and reveal Keller's obsession with himself.

The information is communicated to the audience clearly, in an entertaining tone. I find that Soo breaks down the complex elements very well, such as distinguishing Doomsday "preppers" and "survivalists" (noted around 30 mins into the podcast).

Soo and her husband take on a conversational tone in almost all her episodes and I think strengthens intimacy. It's as if I am listening to a friend telling me a story. I also find it nice when her husband, asks questions, which makes it more of a casual conversation. However, this format informing about a sensitive topic creates a jarring feeling and the sponsor reads in the podcast formulate uncomfortable juxtapositions. I will argue that the narrative momentum tends to oversimplify the complex reality.

Soo's episode demonstrates transparency, and a strong one at that. She will let the audience know if she was not able to verify an information. Her production team also note this on the episode note, modeling responsible practice.

I really enjoy listening to her episodes because of the suspense, the audio use and emotional appeal. She invites me to do a deeper investigation on my own.

Many of her episodes represent a memorial for the victims of the crimes and she collaborates with organizations to establish scholarships. In this way, I think digital history has power and peril in how accessible it is, while maintaining transparency.

For millions of people, including myself, as cooking dinner while listening to murder, her stories function as history. She performs the role of an educator that equips her audiences with tools to consume thoughtfully. Every true crime story had real victims whose lives mattered.

When I queue up Rotten Mango while cooking, it's like participating in a modern practice of historical consumption. I am also, whether I realize it or not, engage in an act of critical awareness. The intimate storytelling and emotional engagement carry this weight of algorithmic influence, speed and potential misinformation.

The episode presented demonstrate the power and responsibility of digital history, and as Stephanie Soo and her production team craft each new topic, they never forget to humanize victims and cite sources with full transparency. Yet the episode's entertainment format will occasionally oversimplify complicated truths. But this is not a condemnation of the podcast, rather a reality of how many of us currently encounter the past.

Trigger warning as this is about true crime. I am not obsessed with true crime. I just occasionally follow stories hoping the guilty party gets punished. I am also interested in psychology and curious about why some people do what they do. It is about wanting the guilty to be punished, and to understand how someone can be so awful. I learn new things daily about my various interests that I have…