#rogersstorm2005

First of all, couldn't have said it any better @capoteera 👏 @bostonboy1981, V, is thesweetest person anyone could ever know. She’s never called anyone names (like I do for example😂) never been after anyone on here, even though God knows how many rightful reasons she has to actually do it!

But V, we all know why they go after you, it's because you’re a true fan who cares enough to always find Chris content first. Like you said, you aren't being sent anything, you just know where and how to look.

The fact that you always beat them to everything, plus having Lisa actually following you drives them absolutelv crazy and it shows. We know by now they are very bitter, very jealous people, so I can only imagine how much it kills them that someone so close to Chris follows you. Plus that follow negates everything they've been saying for the last 3 years about Lisa not being ok with Alba and his choices and whatnot's.

They are dying Imao.

As for what they said about you, I didn't want to post their stupid words out of respect for you, but since you've decided to do it first, I'll take it as a green light for me to do it too. Just wanted to show how all those anons are actually from the biggest idiot of them all, the most jealous, the most crazy and the one who's always wrong:

Captregina.

Not only do we know her style by now (wrong usage of spacing and punctuation)⬇️

She is also dumb enough to send all the anons in one go, and her even dumber lap dog, Rogers, posts them all in one go too 😂⬇️

And finally, Captregina, Mandy, whatever your name is, you’re probably aware that more than one of your ex IRL friends are doing the rounds on lots of blogs, telling all about your ugly personality and what a piece of shit you are. They’re also telling all about your “marriage” arrangement and what it really is. With lots of details and proofs. Therefore, I don’t understand how YOU, of all people, think you’re in a position to question other people’s marriages or family lives. Most people know about your sad life by now and I really think that all that you do online is projecting. You’re trying to deal with unacceptable aspects of your life by placing them onto another person.

One on Chris’ birthday:

And another one on the 14th of June where she pretends as always to know all about PR and “the industry” lmao:

I asked ChatGPT to analyse her based on these 2 posts. I BEG YOU to read it. It is hilarious and very much spot on😂

Based on the posts you’ve shared, we can say quite a lot about Captregina’s online behavior and reasoning style, but much less about who she is as a person in real life.

A few patterns stand out very clearly.

1. She presents speculation as certainty

A fake marriage.

A fake baby.

Publicity contracts.

NDAs governing the relationship.

Severance packages.

Talent-agency negotiations.

Coordinated social-media unfollows.

A “containment protocol.”

A manager directing industry-wide media strategy.

These are extraordinary claims, yet in the text you provided she does not appear to offer verifiable evidence for them. The language is not “I think this happened”; it is “this is what happened.”

That’s a common feature of conspiracy-style reasoning: the confidence level is much higher than the publicly available evidence.

2. She has constructed a comprehensive narrative

What stands out is that she has developed an entire explanatory system.

Within her framework:

If media outlets report the marriage, that’s part of the contract.

If they don’t report something, that’s containment.

If there are no photos, that’s proof.

If there are photos, they’re staged.

If the couple is private, that’s suspicious.

If the couple appears together, that’s contractual.

In other words, nearly every possible piece of evidence can be interpreted as supporting the theory.

When a theory becomes difficult to disprove because every outcome confirms it, that’s usually a sign that the theory is functioning more as a belief system than as a testable hypothesis.

3. She attributes enormous power and coordination to unseen actors

The posts repeatedly invoke:

Managers.

Publicists.

Agencies.

Entertainment media.

Talent representatives.

These groups are portrayed as operating in a highly coordinated fashion with long-term strategic objectives.

The idea that multiple media organizations would collectively participate in a hidden “containment” operation regarding Chris Evans’ family life would require a very large amount of coordination and secrecy.

The larger and more complex a proposed conspiracy becomes, the stronger the evidence needs to be. The posts don’t appear to acknowledge that burden of proof.

4. She appears deeply emotionally invested

The emotional tone is not detached analysis.

Examples include:

“Bullshit.”

“Fake marriage.”

“Fake baby.”

“This girl.”

References to Alba Baptista potentially making extreme accusations.

The language suggests that this is not merely a topic she finds interesting. It appears to be something she feels strongly about.

That doesn’t automatically make her wrong, but emotional investment can make it harder to evaluate evidence neutrally.

5. She often uses industry jargon to create authority

Terms such as:

“Containment protocol”

“Corporate extraction”

“Legacy debt”

“Career cloud”

“Severance package”

“Contract payoff”

give the writing a professional, insider tone.

The issue is that many of these phrases do not correspond to widely recognized entertainment-industry concepts in the way she uses them.

This can create an impression of expertise without providing independently verifiable support.

6. She appears to view Chris Evans primarily through the lens of a perceived injustice

One interesting thing is that her writing often frames Chris Evans as a victim:

Victim of management.

Victim of publicity teams.

Victim of media narratives.

Victim of Alba Baptista.

Victim of industry manipulation.

That pattern suggests she may identify strongly with him or feel protective of him.

Again, that doesn’t tell us who she is as a person, but it tells us something about the role Chris Evans occupies within her narrative.

7. The theory adapts to new information

Notice how the posts explain away contradictory developments.

For example:

Marriage reports become evidence of a contract.

Baby reports become evidence of a fabricated timeline.

Privacy becomes evidence of a cover-up.

Lack of privacy becomes evidence of a publicity stunt.

A hallmark of robust evidence-based reasoning is that some facts could potentially change your mind. In these posts, it’s difficult to identify what kind of evidence would actually falsify the theory.

Overall assessment

If I were describing Captregina’s online behavior based solely on these writings, I would say:

She appears to be a highly invested fan commentator who has developed an elaborate alternative narrative about Chris Evans’ personal life. Her posts display a high degree of certainty, rely heavily on inference and pattern interpretation, attribute significant behind-the-scenes coordination to industry figures, and tend to reinterpret new information in ways that reinforce an existing belief system. The writing is passionate and confident, but the conclusions often go far beyond what can be verified from publicly available evidence.

HEY MANDY, HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE THROWN UNDER THE BUS BY YOUR FAVORITE TOOL?

Imagine spending your Halloween night looking online at all the hotels of a city to see if one of them could maybe remotely look like the background of a video.

Not only is it sad, it’s also not even true.

I hadn’t realised that rage made you actually blind.

Nothing in these photos matches Chris’ video. The windows are different, the curtains are different, the wall is different…. And in the hotel room, there’s a desk and a chair UNDER the TV. So had he been there, the TV wouldn’t have been in the background, the bed would have. Because the way CapT is trying to make it look, Chris would have had to be sitting cross legged on the bed, facing the pillows (🤣) for the TV to be seen behind him. Also the hotel room is way bigger.

In conclusion the man was in his trailer waiting to be called for shooting again. Also, that shirt probably goes with the suit we saw him wearing in his scene with Salma from that Greek morning show.

So nothing new, they were just trying to have their gotcha moment (but failed of course) And that’s because they know they’re in for a difficult few days for all the premieres and press he’s going to show up to with his ring on, thus making them look like the lying, always-wrong, desperate delulus again.

About 6 weeks ago I posted this because the unhinged, crazy, jealous, stupid, mean, ugly…people from the other side attacked my friend Vicky for absolutely no reason.

I’m reposting this because it’s still very much true.

Fuck you all for wanting to look like you are the shit by attacking the nicest person on that app.

Never in a million years will you have 1% of @bostonboy1981’s decency, you sad excuses for human beings