Download ikaw na nga willie revillame mp3

And that is, the case of a six-year-old boy being made to dance ala macho dancer while he is crying and being laughed at because of what he was doing.

Ang KASO naman kasi ang main point dito eh, hindi PA yung mga dapat kasuhan kasi nga aalamin ang FACTS para mapagdiskusyunan. Kung may isip ba naman 'yung host at kung alam niya sa sarili iya na hindi sa kanya dapat idiin ang buong issue eh di nalang siya nagreact ng bonggacious. Magrereact na nga lang, OFF TOPIC PA.

Ang focus tuloy napunta sa mga binanggit na mga artista na tinitira daw siya sa Twitter. Eh, hello? Hindi po sila "nakikisawsaw as ARTISTA", nagte-tweet lang po sila BILANG ISANG ORDINARYONG TAO. Para kasing ang interpretation ko na dun sa pagwawalang-hiya sa kanila ni WR eh "Kung artista ka at magtweet ka, hindi pwedeng against sakin kasi kakasuhan kita". Batas mo kuya?

Ang issue ay tungkol sa pagsayaw ni Jan-jan, hindi ang Ultra Stampede, hindi ang Cory's funeral, hindi ang alitan nyo ni Jobert Sucaldito, hindi ang Wilyonaryo. Inuulit ko, ang kaso ay PAGSAYAW NG ISANG 6-YEAR-OLD BOY NA GUMIGILANG ATUMIIYAK AT PINAULIT-ULIT HABANG NASA RISING PLATFORM, NAGWAWAGAYWAYAN NG PERA SA PALIGID ANG MGA STAFF ETC., HABANG TUMATAWA ANG HOST AT IBA PANG NAKITA KO NA NASA STUDIO AT TUMATAWA RIN. Iyon po ay example ng FACT.

Ang pagbanggit na may kinalaman ito sa network rivalry ay masyado nang OA. Napaglipasan na ng panahon ang mga may bagay na may kinalaman ang ABS-CBN (his former employer), bakit ngayon lang siya umaatungal tungkol sa "dahil sa ratings" na pinagsasabi niya? At bakit doon nya idinidirekta ang issue? Revenge ba ito?

Kawawa naman si Manny Villar. Minsan na nga lang mabanggit ang pangalan niya ngayon, sa ganitong issue pa madadamay. Eh wala naman ako nabasa ni isa sa kahit anong Facebook or Twitter recently na may pangalan ng senador until binanggit ito mismo ng host.

At ang "karangalan na mabastos ni Willie" ayon kay Cristy Fermin..eh....p*tang *na lang talaga ang masasabi ko.

Pinanood ko ang 25-minute speech nya sa Youtube dahil nabitin ako nung nakita ko ito sa TV (patapos na kasi). Magaling kang mag-sales talk, pero walang laman ang mga sinasabi mo. Sayang. This people definitely needs professional help. 

At tulad ng sabi ko sa title, ang issue ay tungkol sa nangyari noong March 12. Sa mga "trolls" na walang ibang masabi kundi mura at maidahilan na "inggit" lang ang nagtutulak sa amin para mag-ingay ng ganito, nakakaawa kayo. Kinokondena ko ang nangyari noong March 12 dahil sa aking pananaw ay may mali rito, pero ngayon, KINOKONEDNA KO NA ANG TV HOST SA PAGWAWALANG HIYA NIYA SA MGA PERSONALIDAD NA PINANGALANAN NIYA SA KANYANG TALUMPATI - malinaw na pag-disrespect sa mga respetadong tao sa ating lipunan. 

Bukod sa mga pagmumura at pagsasabi ng "We Wil Stand", "We support Willie", pagbibigay ng mga "death threats", magsalita kayo ng may KATUTURAN para mapatunayan naman namin na ginagamit nyo nga ang mga utak nyo at hindi lamang dahil sa habol nyo ang "saya at perang" naipapamigay ng show - oo, ng show, hindi ng host. Kung idadahilan nyo sa amin na "ito na nga lang ang aming pamparelax pag-uwi sa bahay", "pag-asa", napaka SELFISH NINYONG MGA TAO. 

Hindi ako mabibili ng pera. Siguro nga, dahil medyo may kaya kami sa buhay kaya ako nakakapagsalita ng ganito. Pero hindi ibig sabihin ay tatahimik na lang kami at hahayaan ang mga batang tulad ni Jan-Jan ay maging alipin ng maling paraan ng pagpapasaya sa tao. Kaya kami nag-iingay ng ganito ay para na rin sa lahat ng batang ayaw na naming maabuso at magising ang media na SUMOSOBRA NA SILA. 

Willie Revillame is in the news... again.

Apparently, all of Willing Willie's major sponsors backed out of their deal in relation to the "Jan-Jan" incident.

A young boy named Jan-Jan Estrada was asked to perform his talent. He then danced like a sexy stripper and was cheered upon by the roaring Willing Willie crowd.

Typical scene? Not the whole picture yet. Jan-Jan was crying the whole time he was dancing. As the music is cued over and over again, he'd start dancing (and crying) much like clockwork. This brought the usual enjoyment of the crowd watching everything live on national TV.

Thus the exodus of endorsers who reasoned that their course of action will "help the networks develop a strict and consistent self-regulatory framework". In short, they just probably want to wash their hands off the ethical concern thrown against the show they profited. But this is a different topic altogether.

What struck me most was a part of Revillame's response in the show [which extended far beyond its regular broadcast as usual]. He wondered why he is the only one being criticized when children are exploited on all networks in the country. He gave particular attention to Going Bulilit, whose success is dependent on its young cast. There are scenes where they are required to wear inappropriate clothing and do outright silly tasks just to deliver the punchline well.

Oo nga naman. Child exploitation is rampant in our age of technology. Most people understand this term as child labor or child trafficking. However, this view makes us oversee exploitation's subtler forms.

As a child, how many times were you asked to perform in front of unfamiliar family members even if you don't feel like it?

"Huwag ka nang mahiya,"

"Uy, sasayaw na 'yan..."

"Sige, may libre kang kendi."

What about being mandated to follow steps in coordination during school presentations even if you don't prefer dancing at the tune of boy bands just to claim that your alma mater has very active and talented students?

With these seemingly innocent acts, adults are actually preventing the children's autonomy to avoid doing what they don't like to do. The former uses the assumed gullibility of the latter for their purposes unclear to the developing individuals.

In the context of Willing Willie, what then would be the difference of teaching a child to dance to get some cash out of a primetime show and selling the same child off to slavery?

Perhaps most people saw the human behind Jan-Jan through his weeping eyes. A display of emotion that is not included in his "performance-level-that-would-solicit-money-from-Willie" package. However, it was after the events has transpired and drastic financial decisions were enacted that everyone started acting so critical about the incident.

Think about it: what if a child star was shot by the camera having a tantrum against staying up late for a shooting? Of course we'd feel bad about the child and blame the parents for treating their son/daughter like this. Bad news: TV is very meticulous in hiding these moments. All they'll show is a happy young actor/actress doing his/her role to express oneself and to hone one's talent and all other slumbook answers anyone could think. If there are tears involved, this would come from the dramatic role being portrayed and not from a sincere burst of emotion.

Television is not really a fantasy world. It is still reality. All the nonprofitable moments were simply omitted and some wishes are materially gratified.