One of my biggest critiques of the hardcore "misandrist feminists" is that their ideas for change are based on punishing men than on securing liberation.
As an example: A mutual of mine reposted a tiktok that said, in summary, Immigration laws should be lessened for women and heightened for men, "So women can travel easier and it would reduce crimes".
There are many things to critique about this view, starting obviously with the extremely xenophobic and right wing idea that immigration is causing crime, but moreso my critique lies with wanting to use a white supremacist system to bring down men for the reason that they hate them.
I'm not hear to say whether or not you can hate men as that's another discussion, but it's very obvious this view isn't centered around liberation, or fighting white supremacy, but instead punishing men for existing using the same tools that got us into this mess in the first place. Theyre right that women should be able to travel much easier, and yet instead of focusing on the system that prevents women from traveling, they seek to weaponize it. Does this sound like a revolutionary set of politics? To maintain the carceral ideas of punishment instead of directing your criticisms to the roots?
In the end, it shows a major flaw is that their hatred becomes blinding, and liberation no longer matters, only flipping the pyramid and reversing who gets to dominate. This is why you so often see people who believe this mindset slide into TERFism and eventually back to anti-feminism.
If your politics center who you hate instead of who you support, you will find yourself having not moved forward at all.










