( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° ) PHILOSOPHICAL JUICE:
Subkeywords: standards; living
You, as a souled individual, directly or indirectly control a body/vehicle:
☆ Are you accountable for the impact of your use on this world, be it positive and/or negative? If yes and/or no: what metrics are used to measure the magnitude of the change you make or create?
What differentiates real impact (Cartesian mathematics) from imaginary biunivocal (purely orthogonality/2 from a Cartesian singularity standpoint; or 45° intervals of axis) in the world you act on?
What bridges practicality and theory is complexity: a multi-component characteristic of substances.
Is there any practical difference inbetween measurability of real [physical] and imaginary [virtual] impacts on the world?
The normal distribution curve is a function of the collapsed complex outputs of individuals on any given world, over time.
If said complexity is relative to social consensus or governmental laws matters little on modern society: the outputs will keep being generated; legally or not.
However: if real profitability (real estate) can occur alongside imaginary profitability (speculation), what is the reason to not invest in complex profitability (social wellbeing)?
Considering that any system is complex in any given environment, it is a display of intelligence (negative entropy applied in comparison to the overall thermodynamic external environment, so the energy output in the system after a period of time is greater than the previous amount of energy in the same system) to increase the output possibility spectrum so that the possible probability output in the system can also increase.
Since intelligent beings, by design, have natural or artificial thermal homeostasis, which, in turn, is possible due to the abundant influx of energy/matter from space; an induced scarcity, to regulate the alternating currents of any system: is it only beneficial to a fundamentally squared (irregular distances from the nucleus of a system's cell) architecture?
Gravitic curvature is a relatively (alternatingly) complex biunivocal function, depending on the bandwidth interval (frequency) of the substances produced by the system. These substances have intervals of catalytical effective productivity.
To limit the maximum output potential of an imaginary substance in a system is, cororarilly, to limit the net total real output potential in a system, for any estate is linearly preceded by imagination, in time.
The agents (real and/or imaginary), in a system, that have direct and/or indirect reach of their outputs inbetween the other complex (real) agents of any given system, also have accountability (consequences) for the lack of action (negligence) and mathematically suprema (yet not ideal) actions in the system.
A more desirable system configuration (an interval inbetween the factorial of [+infinite]{Considering positive, in this case, the aforementioned increase}), thus, is achievable with greater catalytic effectiveness when there is a frequency consonance (EM wave sum), in a system.
This consonance is complex, because it is given multiple alternative referentials. In a social system, the individual complexities compose the social (concerto) system, made by and being made by its individual harmonies (personal singularities). Its imaginary part precedes the real part.
There is a direct proportion in resources' ownership and accountability, in a system.
The system can increase its output quality throughout an (ideally) intelligent management of the resources in the system.
Resources can be real (physical) and imaginary (virtual); though both are also complex (since imagination precedes action as shown earlier).
The degree of accountability, in a social system, is directly related to the complex social consensued terms, which, in turn, vary as a function of cyclical time (such as lunar and solar phases).
A system is more effective when it outputs more qualified substances than the system had beforehand.
Quality can be indirectly measured by the individual's feeling (such as sadness or happiness) and emotional states (such as anger or joy), though it is an individual characteristic, idiosyncratic to each person's personal philosophy.
Quantity can be directly measured by socially conventioned terms and metrics (such as the pound or the kilogram system). The interchange between different metrics of states between different social cells (such as countries or families) could produce a non-zero sum, in quality terms, as long as the individuals' output in said exchange are given an adequate amount of remuneration, proportional to the quality of that which they can provide.
Since quality time is superior to quantity time, in regards to individual relatabilities in a system, and as time is the only ever-decreasing (in quantity) resource that living beings have (as eventually, any star fades); and since quality pertains to individual opinions (before they can form a consensus in the marketplace), the imaginary part of a complex function is determinant to the sustainability of any system.
Creativity, a derivative of the imaginary capabilities of living creatures (some would call a function of God), improves the quality of the substances in a system throughout an adequate use of Will.
Willpower is harnessed by discipline, which, in turn, is a complex function of imaginary substances (feelings, thoughts, emotions) in a real (physical) vehicle.
