#protectdemocracy

"When juxtaposing the scorecard on political violence, the evidence is overwhelming that activists, anarchists, special interests, and Deep State operatives from the far-Left are much more likely to engage in violence than any group from the Right…"

When social media magnates and election skeptics scrutinized New York City's ballots, they mistook voting laws for conspiracy—and exposed a dangerous pattern of disinformation.

On November 4, 2025, as New Yorkers lined up to vote in their mayoral election, billionaire X owner Elon Musk took to his platform with an alarming declaration: "The New York City ballot form is a scam!" He pointed to candidates appearing twice on ballots and former Governor Andrew Cuomo's placement at the bottom as undeniable proof of election rigging.

It sounded convincing to his millions of followers. But it wasn't true—not in any meaningful way.

What Musk called fraud was actually New York's legal "fusion voting" system—where candidates can appear under multiple party lines. Zohran Mamdani (Democrat/Working Families) and Curtis Sliwa (Republican/"Protect Animals") both appeared twice legally.

Cuomo's bottom placement followed standard ballot ordering rules for independent parties. Experts called the claims easily verifiable misinformation.

When routine election procedures are recast as conspiracies, our democratic foundation erodes—not from hypothetical fraud, but from deliberate misinterpretation by powerful voices.

“Honey, let’s go vote for leaving the EU, punishing homosexuals, a total abortion ban, abolishing most taxes, banning divorce, and replacing the legal code with religion.” Sounds absurd? And yet, over 20% of voters in yesterday’s Polish presidential election supported exactly those kinds of views.

Two far-right candidates — together, they won one fifth of the Polish vote. Add to that nearly 30% for the candidate of a party that spent the last eight years dismantling democracy, humiliating us on the international stage, and tearing apart the social fabric of this country.

But the worst part? Over 30% of citizens didn’t vote at all. After all the years of fighting for freedom and democracy, after decades of building a sovereign, European Poland — over 10 million people chose to stay home.

This isn’t just about political preferences anymore. It’s about fundamental values. About whether Poland will be a country that’s open and safe for everyone — or whether we’re about to rewind history by decades.

I’m ashamed. I’m heartbroken. And for the first time, I’m seriously wondering whether this place is still my home.

Pass the “No Kings Act!”

1,255 so far! Help us get to 2,000 signers!

I’m writing in support of the “No Kings Act,” introduced by Leader Schumer in August. This bill would reassert Congress’s constitutional authority and curb the judiciary’s unchecked power.

The "No Kings Act" addresses several key issues:

Congressional Authority Under Article III: The No Kings Act uses Congress’s constitutional authority under Article III to set "Exceptions" and "Regulations" to the Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction. This power has been historically recognized as an important tool to limit the Court's reach, particularly when it comes to cases that could undermine democratic governance.

Neutralizing the Trump v. United States Decision: Leader Schumer’s legislation aims to counteract the Supreme Court’s decision granting former President Trump—and all presidents—immunity from prosecution for official acts. By removing lower courts' jurisdiction over presidential immunity and removing the Supreme Court’s appellate authority in this context, the No Kings Act asserts Congress’s constitutional role in preserving the rule of law and ensuring accountability at the highest levels.

Legal Safeguards: The bill also limits the Supreme Court's ability to review the bill's constitutionality, thereby reinforcing Congress’s role in determining the boundaries of judicial authority. This is not only a constitutionally justified action but also a necessary measure to protect democratic norms from judicial overreach.

If we don’t set limits on the power of a sitting president, or on our out-of-control Supreme Court, our democracy will suffer—greatly. Please support the No Kings Act. Thanks.

▶ Created on September 24 by Jess Craven · 101 signers in the past 7 days

📱 Text SIGN PLBYTZ to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409

📊 Nearly 8 in 10 Americans support voter ID. That includes strong majorities of Democrats. Yet Washington elites call it “suppression.” The SAVE Act offers multiple ID options — passport, military ID, driver’s license. Hardly a “nightmare.”

📖 READ NOW: https://www.undergroundusa.com/p/gaslighting-101-how-democrats-are

🚫 Prohibit Felons From Serving as President

✍️ 283 so far! Help us get to 500 signers!

I am deeply concerned about the possibility of felons serving as President of the United States. While our Constitution doesn't explicitly bar felons from running, I believe the presidency, as a symbol of moral leadership, should be beyond reproach. A felon in this role could erode justice and public trust, setting a dangerous precedent.

Although federal law allows felons to run, state laws often restrict felons' civic rights—raising questions about fairness and consistency in legal application. From a security standpoint, the risks of entrusting someone with a criminal history with nuclear codes or military decisions are considerable.

We must consider a constitutional amendment to close this gap and preserve the integrity of our highest office.

▶ Created on November 6 by Marcus

📱 Text SIGN PDCKKQ to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW MEEVV to 50409