Ah, I almost forgot to post about this. Or did I forget? Probably. Anyway!
After learning more I do think the polymorph definition doesnât need to specify energy beings, among the other notable characteristics (amorphous, essence-shifting, mirroring instinct).
I still feel that the initial description was really important to have and should be kept (âstarstuffâ), âcause that helped me, so it stands to reason it could do the same for others. I just donât think it needs to only include that now, I think there should be more descriptions given on âtrueformsâ (or whatever you personally call yours, I like baseforms best tbh, since we (nova) donât have a form thatâs âmost trueâ).
Idk if thatâs explanatory enough...let me elaborate.
There are physical and nonphysical polymorphsâand again, Iâm referring to us amorphous essence-shifters, not general polymorphic beingsâI know that for certain now. I had never met any before, but like I said in the past, I am happy to discuss changing the definition regarding baseform varieties. I think that having descriptions for the other baseforms would be really helpful for those still questioning, like how the original âstarstuffâ one helped me.
Hopefully that makes sense.
*Sigh* anyway, for disclaimer-y reasons, since Iâm leaving this without a do not reblog, hereâs this:
1. Iâm not saying other polymorphic beings donât exist or something, or âthereâs only the one kind of polymorph and thatâs us,â Iâm just not talking about other polymorphic creatures here.
2. Iâm not acting as if I have any actual say over the definition of polymorphsâagain, the kintypeâIâm just saying I personally think it should include more baseform types, since Iâve come to learn there are other amorphous essence-shapeshifters. Iâd like all polymorphs to find themselves and friends who can understand, and I know how hard that is even as one who has a baseform description, so I think the others should have that at least, too.
3. Iâm really not interested in fighting, yâall. If you want to I probably wonât reply, but we may be able to have a discussion?
4. Regarding the description/definition of us, Iâm referencing the âpolymorphsâ page on eristic .net.
Annnnnd I think thatâs everything, finally. Time to throw this into the tags and brace for stress.















