c-allophone-ia girls,
we are predictable,
distinct speech sounds,
easy to spot
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
c-allophone-ia girls,
we are predictable,
distinct speech sounds,
easy to spot

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A Linguistic Analysis of Kendrick Lamar
The sounds that we make are called phonemes. They construct the entirety of any spoken language. But when they are used in music, or poetry, they can have a different utility to what we may be used to. Rap music, which we will be focussing on, has flow. Flow is the way the words come out, and their link to the music. It is a critical part of rap. A bad flow can completely ruin a song, and an artist’s reputation. Kendrick Lamar has an excellent flow, not least because of his interest in poetry. This is, I would argue, what separates Lamar from other artists. When you listen to his music, there is no sense that the words were only put there for the purpose of the flow. Instead, they feel natural, and organic, which, as someone who writes poetry is very impressive. It takes a lot of skill to have the rhyming structure flow naturally, and to then fit with the music. I will be exploring Humble and Alright from a linguistic, and musical perspective through the rhymes used, and how that fits with the flow.
So-- I'm really bad at phonetics lmao- and I'm not sure if my conlangs make any sense at all.
Does anyone have some feedback for me on this one? Or any tips on how to go about making sound inventories? I'd like to get better at them.
I just don't know what distribution of phonemes makes sense, and sound change has always been a mystery to me-
what's your favorite phoneme?
@favorite-phoneme-creature
probably /y:/ and /Y/ ! :>
(e.g the ü in the German "über" and "Hütte" respectively)
Gotta see if this is on the Thai language/culture resources posts, but this is a language thing that's always bothered me:
Why, when languages are transliterated into English, do people use transliterations that don't make sense in English?
In the context of Thai, this comes up for me with the hard "T" or "P" sound being spelled with a "Th" or "Ph"
But I first thought of it way back when I got involved in anime fandom, and people transliterate long vowels in Japanese to English with double vowels:
"Aa" instead of Ā (to indicate the acknowledgement noise/yes)
"Iie" instead of īe or, idk, eeay
"zanpakutoo" instead of, idk, zanpakutō or zanpakutoe
I ask this because (for the Thai example) I tended to assume that, for instance, Phongsakorn was pronounced "Fongsakorn", like with the "F" in "Fog", rather than "Pongsakorn", like with the "P" in "Pong"
And "Theerakit" was pronounced "Theerakit" like with the Th in "These", rather than "Teerakit", like with the "T" in "Tea"
And, for Japanese, English doesn't really do long vowels very much, so I can see that being harder to transliterate properly, but the way it's transliterated still feels like it lends itself to mispronunciation? Because if the transliteration is for native English speakers:
"aa" looks like i should hold the short English A vowel sound, not like I should pronounce it something a longer version of the first o in "octopus"
"ee" looks like I should be prouncing it like the ee in "eeek", not like a longer version of the first e in "nether"
"ii" isn't going to read like the eee in "eeek", it reads like the sarcastically long "i" in "iiiiii don't know what to tell you"
"oo" is going to read like the oo in "oooo it's a ghost" rather than 'hey you should hold this vowel for another beat'
"ou" looks like, variously, almost what it's meant to look like ("arigatou" actually does parse as an English long O vowel sound, although it still doesn't parse as a sustained vowel sound)
OR, "ou" looks like it should be pronounced like the "ou" in "dour" or "hour" ("Kaname Tousen" could go either way for me)
With Japanese, I can reason out the problems - there's really no good way to transliterate a long vowels without using the diacritics, but those take extra effort to type, and most people didn't know how to type them in [insert word processor of choice], so basically you had to learn a whole new spelling and grammar schema, and this was at least easy to pick up.
With Thai, it's a little less clear, because it seems like there's already a one-for-one transliteration of the sound you're going for, so why use a different combination of letters?
I guess what I'm ultimately wondering is, are my ears broken? Am i missing some nuance to the pronunciation of the TH and PH phonemes, that makes it important to differentiate between T & Th, and P & Ph?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Marathi allophones for /ə/
So, Marathi has three allophones for the /ə/ phoneme:
[ə]: found on most occasions (e.g. अंग [əŋɡə], “body”)
[ʌ]: rare; usually found before the [ɦa] syllable (e.g. महाराज [mʌɦaɾaːd͡z], “king”)
[ɤː]: more prevalent; usually found before [ɭ̆] (e.g. कळ [kɤːɭ̆], “twinge”).
(Originally posted on Threads.)
Sometimes, you have to figure out juuuuust what level of animation fidelity you can achieve for a project that has a strict budget and deadline. Here's how I broke down some options for the client! In the end, we used a mix of rigged puppets in After Effects and moments of hand-drawn animation for impact.
In this same section, he lets us hear his own voice: one page consists of the same, short letter, written twice: once conventionally, and once in the distinctive mishmash of English, Greek and Hebrew characters that he used as a phonemic alphabet. By the weight of the ink one can see that Newton had to take care with this second version, writing each word slowly as he sounded it out to himself.
Loving ffriend, It is commonly reported that you are sick. Truly I am sorry for that. But I am much more sorry that you got your sicknesse (for that they say too) by drinking too much. I ernestly desire you first to repent of your haveing beene drunk & then to seeke to recover your health. And if it pleas God that you ever bee well againe then have a care to live healthfully & soberly for time to come. This will bee very well pleasing to all your freinds & especially to Your very loving friend
Try reading this aloud, and enjoy the roll of Newton's vowels:
Luvin ffrend It iz komonloy ripωωrted đat yw ar sik. Triuli Oy am sori for đat. But Oy am mutש mωωr sori đat yw got {yur} siknes (for that đee see tu) boy driעkin tu mutש. Oy ernestloy dizoir yw furst tω ripent of yur heviע byn druעk and đen tω suk tω rikover yur helθ. And if it plijz God that yw iver by well egeen đen heev ee kaar tω liv helθfuli & sωωberli for toim tω kum. đis wil by veri wel pliiziע tω ool yur frendz & ispeשali tω Your veri luviע frend
Even at a distance of four centuries, Newton's rendering of 'I' as 'oy', -ly as 'loy', time as 'toim' and desire as 'dizoir', and his doubled-up long vowels in 'more'/mωωr and 'again'/egeen locate the speaker firmly in the English East Midlands.
"The Notebook: A History of Thinking on Paper" - Roland Allen