The two meetings were amazing.
Wilfredo Pascual’s seminar on personal essays was, at the very least, a revelation. Not only did he speak in a wonderful oration, he also shared bits and pieces of his work and his process. He was generous in his tips and his photos; generous in letting today’s students have a taste of what he’s worked on for almost the entirety of his current life.
While I have trouble remembering the exact details of everything he’s read, I remember Animalia and Kilometer Zero. I specifically remembering finding his bad story crazy interesting.
I wouldn’t go as far as to say that he has pure talent; rather, I believe that his manner of writing is a product of both peculiar experiences and a vested passion in writing (since youth).
I dare say that some people are made, even destined, to write, while others are not. This makes it a delicate art, for me. However, if one has the drive, he or she can definitely work harder and practice much, much more.
On the other hand, the PHSA trip was breathtaking.Â
The entire place was beautiful—it was an entire campus at the disposal of less than 200 students. I imagine that it would be difficult not to be bored, and one of the reasons why they’re of such a low number is because of the isolation.
First off, seeing the exhibit was surprising. It was of such amazing quality; then again, I should not have expected less from the Philippine High School of the Arts. It was inspiring, when I thought about it; all of the work displayed in the room was gathered, created, and arranged by people my age, including the artwork.
The prose written on the walls by acrylic paint was simple. That, though, in my opinion, added to the charm of the exhibit. Making sentences simple and easy to understand would definitely make way for less misunderstandings, which was in line with the goal of the entire exhibit—to reduce misconceptions about indigenous groups.
As striking as the curation was, I think that she could’ve improved upon several bits. One, she could’ve tried to get an expert on the local language. As she mentioned, she barely understood their words. While I have no doubt that she tried her very best when translating, I believe that many parts of the conversations must’ve been lost in translation; some words may have had connotations that she didn’t understand.
Two, I think that her method of collecting data wasn’t very effective nor efficient. She mentioned things about how it was very difficult, as she had to do everything herself; taking notes, creating transcripts, filming—all on top of barely understanding the dialect.
One thing is clear, however; the entire output was eye-opening. It was eye-opening not only because it taught of the chosen minority, but because it showed us—students of her age group—that we could do so much more. It showed us that we shouldn’t cage our talents in the painfully conventional. We can create something both politically-charged and artistic, and try to make something that actually matters—a catalyst for change, even at the smallest degree.















