#oralcontracts

Florida law imposes strict time limits on how long creditors can pursue legal action to collect a debt. Once a statute of limitations expires, the right to file a lawsuit vanishes—and with it, the most powerful collection tools available. Understanding when these deadlines begin, what tolls or extends them, and how to preserve claims before expiration is essential to recovering what is owed. A commercial invoice ages quietly in the accounting system. The debtor stops returning calls. Months pass, then a year, then more. By the time the decision is made to escalate the matter, the window to file suit may have already closed. The statute of limitations does not announce itself—it simply expires, and with it, the legal right to compel payment through the courts. What remains is a claim without remedy, a debt without leverage. What the Statute of Limitations Means for Debt Collection The statute of limitations is a deadline imposed by law that restricts the period during which a creditor may file a lawsuit to recover a debt. In Florida, these time limits vary depending on the nature of the underlying obligation. Once the statutory period runs, the claim becomes legally unenforceable in court. The debt itself does not disappear, but the ability to obtain a judgment—and with it, access to garnishment, levy, and other judicial remedies—is lost. Florida Statutes § 95.11 governs the limitations periods for most civil actions, including those arising from contracts and commercial obligations. The clock begins to run on the date the cause of action accrues, which is typically the date of the breach or the date payment became due and was not made. Determining that date with precision is not always straightforward, particularly when payment terms are ambiguous, partial payments have been made, or the debtor has acknowledged the obligation in writing. Florida's Limitations Periods for Common Debt Types Different categories of debt carry different deadlines. The most common limitations periods under Florida law include: - Written contracts: Five years from the date of breach (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b)) - Oral contracts: Four years from the date of breach (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k)) - Open accounts: Four years from the date the account becomes due (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k)) - Promissory notes and instruments in writing: Five years from the date of default (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b)) - Judgments: Twenty years from the date of entry, subject to renewal (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(1)) The classification of the debt determines the applicable period. A signed service agreement with payment terms constitutes a written contract. An unsigned course of dealing with invoices and payments may constitute an open account or oral agreement. Misclassification can lead to applying the wrong limitations period and misjudging the urgency of filing suit. Consider a hypothetical: a contractor completes work under a signed agreement in January 2018, with final payment due in March 2018. The client does not pay. The five-year limitations period begins in March 2018 and expires in March 2023. A complaint filed in April 2023 would be untimely, even if the debt remains unpaid and the debtor has not disputed liability. The remedy is foreclosed by the passage of time alone. Tolling, Revival, and the Risk of Premature Expiration Certain events can suspend or restart the limitations period. Florida law recognizes tolling—circumstances that pause the running of the statute—and revival, where a debtor's conduct resets the clock. Neither is automatic, and both require specific factual support. Tolling may occur when the debtor leaves the state for a continuous period, or when the debtor conceals their whereabouts in a manner that prevents service of process. Under Fla. Stat. § 95.051(1)(a), the time during which a defendant is absent from the state and cannot be served is excluded from the limitations period, provided the absence is continuous and the creditor exercises diligence in attempting service. Sporadic travel or temporary relocation does not toll the statute. Revival—restarting the clock—typically requires a new written acknowledgment of the debt or a partial payment made with the clear intent to satisfy the original obligation. Florida courts have held that a partial payment can revive a time-barred claim if it constitutes an unequivocal acknowledgment of liability. However, vague statements or payments made without reference to the underlying debt may not suffice. The law does not favor revival, and ambiguity is resolved against the party asserting it. Importantly, the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense. It does not prevent the filing of a lawsuit; it provides the debtor with grounds to seek dismissal if raised. A debtor who fails to plead the defense in a timely answer or motion waives it. This procedural posture does not justify delay—waiting until a claim is nearly time-barred invites both tactical disadvantage and exposure to waiver arguments—but it does mean that expiration is not an automatic bar until the debtor invokes it. The Strategic Window Before Expiration Once a claim approaches the end of its limitations period, options narrow. Settlement negotiations carry less weight when the debtor knows litigation is no longer a viable threat. Demand letters lose their urgency. The creditor's leverage evaporates not because the debt is disputed, but because time has eroded the means of enforcement. Filing suit preserves the claim. A complaint filed even one day before the statute expires tolls the limitations period for that action, provided service is effected with reasonable diligence. But once the deadline passes, the opportunity to file is gone. There is no equitable remedy for a creditor who simply waited too long. Courts do not excuse inadvertence, administrative delay, or the hope that the debtor would eventually pay voluntarily. The calculus changes when the claim is reduced to judgment. Florida law allows a judgment to be enforced for twenty years from the date of entry, and that period can be extended indefinitely through timely renewal. A judgment creditor retains access to garnishment, execution, charging orders, and proceedings supplementary—tools that remain available long after the underlying contractual claim would have expired. Converting a claim into a judgment is not merely a procedural step; it is a transformation of the creditor's legal position. For businesses managing multiple receivables across time, understanding when a claim must be judicially preserved is a matter of effective debt collection strategy. What Happens When the Statute Runs A time-barred debt does not vanish from the creditor's books, but it does lose its legal teeth. The debtor is no longer subject to suit for the underlying obligation. Continued collection efforts—demand letters, calls, account reporting—must navigate the constraints of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, both of which prohibit threatening legal action that cannot lawfully be taken. A creditor cannot sue on a time-barred claim and cannot threaten to do so. The debtor may still choose to pay voluntarily. Moral obligation, credit considerations, or business reputation may motivate payment even after the statute has run. But voluntary payment is a different posture than enforceable liability. The creditor has lost the ability to compel compliance, and with it, the strongest incentive the debtor had to settle or pay. Mistakes in this area are costly. Filing suit on a time-barred claim exposes the creditor to sanctions, fee-shifting, and reputational harm. Threatening to sue when the limitations period has expired invites regulatory complaints and damages claims. Precision in calendaring, classification, and documentation is not optional—it is foundational to lawful and effective collection. Time limits on debt collection exist whether they are acknowledged or not. The statute of limitations does not bend to business realities, settlement efforts, or the hope that a debtor will eventually do the right thing. Claims age, deadlines pass, and leverage disappears. What separates recovered debt from written-off loss is often nothing more than attention to the calendar and the will to act before the window closes. For businesses navigating complex collection landscapes, the margin for delay is thinner than it appears. Closing Remarks If a debt is approaching the end of its limitations period, if partial payments or acknowledgments may have reset the clock, or if the classification of the underlying obligation remains unclear, the cost of inaction compounds with each passing month. Marcadis Law Firm has spent nearly five decades preserving creditors' claims, converting aging receivables into enforceable judgments, and navigating the statutes that govern when collection rights expire. Contact us to evaluate your claims before time runs out. Frequently Asked Questions Can a creditor still collect on a debt after the statute of limitations expires? A debt does not disappear when the statute of limitations runs, but the creditor loses the right to file a lawsuit to enforce it. The debtor may still pay voluntarily, and the creditor may continue non-judicial collection efforts, provided those efforts do not threaten or imply that legal action will be taken. The expiration of the statute removes the most powerful enforcement tool—court judgment and execution—but does not extinguish the underlying obligation. Does making a partial payment restart the statute of limitations in Florida? A partial payment can restart the statute of limitations if it constitutes an unequivocal acknowledgment of the debt and an intent to pay the balance. Florida courts have recognized that such payments may revive a claim that would otherwise be time-barred. However, the payment must be clearly attributable to the specific debt, and the debtor's intent must be evident. Ambiguous payments or those made without reference to the original obligation may not have this effect, and the law does not presume revival from conduct alone. What is the statute of limitations on a credit card debt in Florida? Credit card debt is typically treated as an open account or a written contract, depending on the terms of the cardholder agreement. If governed by a written agreement, the limitations period is five years. If characterized as an open account, the period is four years. The classification depends on the language of the agreement and the nature of the ongoing credit relationship. The clock begins to run from the date of default or the date the account becomes due and unpaid. Can the statute of limitations be waived or extended by agreement? Florida law allows parties to shorten the statute of limitations by contract, but any such provision must be reasonable and cannot reduce the period below one year. Extending the statute of limitations prospectively—before the claim accrues—is generally disfavored and may not be enforceable. After a claim accrues, a debtor can agree in writing to waive the statute of limitations defense, effectively reviving the claim or acknowledging liability. Any such waiver must be clear, voluntary, and supported by consideration or a recognized exception. Does the statute of limitations apply to judgments in Florida? Florida judgments carry their own statute of limitations, which is twenty years from the date of entry. This period is significantly longer than the limitations periods for the underlying contractual claims. A judgment can be renewed before expiration, effectively extending enforcement rights indefinitely. This makes obtaining a judgment a strategic priority for creditors managing long-term receivables, as it converts a time-sensitive claim into a durable enforcement right with access to post-judgment remedies such as garnishment, levy, and discovery of assets. References - Florida Statutes § 95.11 – Limitations other than for the recovery of real property (Verified) - Florida Statutes § 95.051 – Suspension of running of statute (Verified) Read the full article