#operation garden plot

What was Rex 84?

Introduction Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a classified scenario and drill developed by the United States federal government to detain large numbers of United States citizens deemed to be “national security threats” in the event that the president declared a National Emergency. Background The plan was first revealed in detail in a major daily newspaper by reporter Alfonso…

What was Operation Garden Plot?

Introduction The Department of Defence Civil Disturbance Plan, also known by its cryptonym GARDEN PLOT, was a general US Army and National Guard plan to respond to major domestic civil disturbances within the United States. Refer to Rex 84. Background The plan was developed in response to the civil disorders of the 1960s and fell under the control of the US Northern Command (NORTHCOM). It…

New Post has been published on http://newspiracy.com/infowars-nightly-news-tuesday-3-24-15/

Infowars Nightly News: Tuesday (3-24-15)

On the March 24, 2015 broadcast of The Infowars Nightly News, ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Think an Army Training Exercise Will Bring Martial Law to the US This Summer. ISIS releases hit list of 100 American military personnel. Forcibly taking DNA for all misdemeanors. Banks to call cops on customers who withdrawal over $5000. Operation Garden Plot.

http://www.infowars.com/ http://prisonplanet.tv/news/

▶ Anonymous – Emergency Warning: On FEMA Camps – YouTube.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ6jO0YyaA0&w=627&h=383]

28 Nov 2013

Greetings citizens of the world, We are Anonymous

This is an Emergency Warning!

Concentration Camps Official Document…

The United States Civil Disturbance Plan 55-2

The following information was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The original printing was of June 1, 1984. The information herein is UNCLASSIFIED and does not come within the scope of directions governing the protection of information affecting the national security. 

It took a little more than three years to obtain a full copy of Operation Garden Plot from the U.S. Government, and was done so under the freedom of information act for unclassified documents. The implications within the full context of this document should make the hair on the back of your head stand on end!!!!! 

In this document signed by the Secretary of the Army, is hereby assigned as DOD Executive Agent for civil disturbance control operations. Under Plan 55-2 he is to use airlift and logistical support, in assisting appropriate military commanders in the 50 states, District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and US possessions and territories, or any political subdivision thereof. 

The official name of this project is called "Operation Garden Plot."

Under this plan for the deployment of Operation Garden Plot, the use of CIDCON-1 will be mandatory. This direct support of civil disturbance control operations is to be used by the Army, USAF, Navy, and Marine Corp. with an airlift force to be comprised of MAC Organic Airlift Resources, airlift capable aircraft of all other USAF major commands, and all other aerial reconnaissance and Airborne Psychological Operations. This is to include control communications systems, aeromedical evacuation, helicopter and Weather Support Systems. 

If any civil disturbance by a resistance group, religious organization, or other persons considered to be non-conformist takes place, under Appendix 3 to Annex B of Plan 55-2 hereby gives all Federal forces total power over the situation if local and state authorities cannot put down said dissenters. 

Annex A, section B of Operation Garden Plot defines tax protesters, militia groups, religious cults, and general anti-government dissenters as Disruptive Elements. This calls for the deadly force to be used against any extremist or dissident perpetrating any and all forms of civil disorder. 

Under section D, a Presidential Executive Order will authorize and direct the Secretary of Defense to use the Armed Forces of the United States to restore order. 

2 TAB A APPENDIX 1 TO ANNEX S USAF CIVIL DISTURBANCE PLAN 55-2 EXHIBIT POR:SGH, JCS Pub 6, Vol 5, AFR 160-5 hereby provides for America's military and the National Guard State Partnership Program to join with United Nations personal in said operations. This links selected U.S. National Guard units with the Defense Ministries of "Partnership For Peace." This was done in an effort to provide military support to civil authorities in response to civil emergencies. 

Under Presidential Decision Directive No. 25, this program serves to cement people to relationships between the citizens of the United States, and the global military of the UN establishments of the emerging democracies of Central and Eastern European countries. This puts all of our National Guardsmen under the direct jurisdiction of the United Nations. 

Section 3:This plan could be implemented under any of the following situation: 

(1) SITUATION. Spontaneous civil disturbances which involve large numbers of persons and/or which continue for a considerable period of time, may exceed the capacity of local civil law enforcement agencies to suppress. Although this type of activity can arise without warning as a result of sudden, unanticipated popular unrest (past riots), it may also result from more prolonged dissidence. 

This would most likely be an outgrowth of serious social, political or economic issues which divide segments of the American population. Such factionalism could manifest itself through repeated demonstrations, protest marches and other forms of legitimate opposition but which would have the potential for erupting into spontaneous violence with little or no warning. 

(2) SITUATION. Planned acts of violence or civil disobedience which, through arising from the same causes as (1) above, are seized upon by a dedicated group of dissidents who plan and incite purposeful acts designed to disrupt social order. 

This may occur either because leaders of protest organizations intentionally induce their followers to perpetrate violent acts, or because a group of militants infiltrates an otherwise peaceful protest and seeks to divert it from its peaceful course. 

(2 C) Environmental satellite products will be continue to be available.

(2 D) Responsibilities. Meteorological support to civil disturbance operations will be arranged or provided by AWS wings. 

The 7th Weather Wing (7WW) is responsible for providing / arranging support for Military Airlift Command (MAC) airlift operations. The 5th Weather Wing (5WW) is responsible for supporting the United States Army Forces Command. 

Civil disturbance may threaten or erupt at any time in the CONUS and grow to such proportions as to require the use the Federal military forces to bring the situation under control. 

A flexible weather support system is required under control. A flexible weather support system is required to support the many and varied options of this Plan. 

ANNEX H: XXOW, AWSR 55-2, AWSR 23-6, AFR 23-31, AR 115-10, AFR 105-3. 

Subsection B: 

Concept of Environmental Support. Environmental support will be provided by elements of Air Weather Service (AWS) in accordance with refs a-f. The senior staff meteorologist deployed int the Task Force Headquarters (TFH) will be the staff weather officer (SWO) to the TFH. 

Centralized environmental support products are requested in accordance with AWSR 105-18. Weather support is provided by weather units located at existing CONUS bases or by deployed SWOs and / or weather teams to the objective areas. 

Support MAC source will be provide in accordance with the procedures in MARC 103-15. MAC forces will be provided in accordance with the procedures in AFR 105-3. 

Air Force Global Weather Central: Provides centralized products as requested. 

REFERENCES : JCS Pub 18 - Doctrine for Operations Security AFR 55-30,

Operations Security 

1. GENERAL: Opposition forces or groups may attempt to gain knowledge of this plan and 'use that knowledge to prevent or degrade the effectiveness of the actions outlined in this plan. In order to protect operations undertaken to accomplish the mission, it is necessary to control sources of information that can be exploited by those opposition forces or groups. 

OPSEC is the effort to protect operations by identifying and controlling intelligence indicators susceptible to exploitation. The objective of OPSEC, in the execution of this plan, is to assure the security of operations, mission effectiveness, and increase the probability of mission success. 

2. RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC):  The denial of information to an enemy is inherently a command responsibility. However, since the operations Officer at any level of command is responsible to his commander for the Overall planning and execution of operations, he has the principal staff interest in assuring maximum protection of the operation and must assume primary responsibility instability for ensuring that the efforts of all other staff elements are coordinated toward this end. However, every other individual associated with, or aware of, the operation must assist in safeguarding the security of the operation. 

3. OBJECTIVES FOR OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC):

a. The basic objective of OPSEC is to preserve the security of friendly forces and thereby to enhance the probability of successful mission accomplishment. "Security" in this context relates to the protection of friendly forces. It also includes the protection of operational information to prevent degradation of mission effectiveness through the disclosure of prior knowledge of friendly operations to the opposition. 

b. OPSEC pervades the entire planning process and must be a matter of continuing concern from the conception of an operation, throughout the preparatory and execution phases, and during critiques, reports, press releases, and the like conducted during the post operation phase. 

4. OPERATIONS ORDERS AND SOP:  Specific operations orders and standard operating procedures "MUST be developed with the awareness that the opposition may be able to identify and exploit vulnerable activities. 

Reference Material: 

Released under Freedom of Information Act on March 30th, 1990. All material presented here has been declassified and supersedes USAD Operations Plan 355-10 of July 16, 1973. Information released by USAF under supervision of Alexander K. Davidson, BRIG. GEN, USAF, Dep. Director of Operations. 

APPENDEX 5 TO ANNEX E TO USAF CIVIL DISTURBANCE PLAN 55-2 Annex Z. Other References: 10 United States Codes 331,332,333,8500,1385, MARC 105-1, MARC 105-18, AR 115-10, AFR 105-3, PDD-25.

Please note - above is from 1990.

CURRENT US MILITARY REGIME

In the course of 20 years do you believe the US Military Regime has grown tighter or looser.

In reading Operation Garden Plot it seems to allude to environmental control through the Weather Service and control on the ground has evolved into FEMA - creating encampments for civil distress/unrest.

Would it appear that the Executive branch has usurped more power than that of the Legislative or Judicial branches? 

How well supported are the Constitutional Rights of the citizens of the United States? 

Consider $711 billion dollars was spent by the United States government on military spending in 2010.

The Council of Governors signed by President Obama on January 11, 2010 consists of the Secretary of Defense as the chairperson with 10 governors (Vermont, Washington, Puerto Rico, Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Missouri, South Dakota, and Arizona) [these 10 members are appointed by the President], Secretary of Homeland Security, Asst to President for Homeland Security and Counter Terrorism, Asst to President for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement, Asst to Sec of Defense for Homeland Defense and America's Security Affairs, USNORTHCOM Commander, Commandant US Coast Guard, Chief National Guard Bureau. The representation is closely affiliated with FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency. This was a recommendation of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is scheduled to be passed this week. It further codifies the ability for the military to detain, interrogate, and potentially imprison persons identified through the Executive branch without court trial. This is in support of the "war on terrorism".

According to the Washington Post article from today:

Our law enforcement, military and intelligence workers have spent more than a decade carefully and collaboratively determining how to work together in the war against terrorism. But these proposed changes would require the military to take on a new responsibility as police, jailors and judges — jobs for which it is not equipped and which it does not want. These changes to our laws would also authorize the military to exercise unprecedented power on U.S. soil.

WHEN ARE THE PEOPLE GOING TO RALLY AGAINST THE MILITARY REGIME?

This is where $711 billion dollars are being dumped from our economy. The US has 49% of the entire world's military forces. We spend more on our armed forces than in any area that provides for the well being of our citizens.

The argument is that if we cut back on spending that we ease on our position against terrorism. Lets look at that a different way - if the US has the LARGEST military force deployed all over the world to carry out its agenda - are we not the terrorists on foreign soil? Who is bullying whom?