Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I had not intended to discuss this controversial subject at this particular time. However, I want you to know that I do not shun controversy. On the contrary, I will take a stand on any issue at any time, regardless of how fraught with controversy it might be. You have asked me how I feel about MikeM. All right, here is how I feel about MikeM:
If when you say MikeM you mean the devil’s statistician, the Twitter scourge, the bloody monster, that defiles innocence, dethrones reason, destroys the home, creates misery and poverty, yea, literally takes the bread from the mouths of the poor children of developing nations; if you mean the evil climate scientist that topples the auditing man and woman from the pinnacle of righteous, gracious living into the bottomless pit of degradation, and despair, and shame and helplessness, and hopelessness, then certainly I am against his stance.
But, if when you say MikeM you mean the oil of conversation, the philosophic wine, the ClimateBall character that is discussed when good fellows get together, that puts a song in their hearts and laughter on their lips, and the warm glow of contentment in their eyes; if you mean AGU cheer; if you mean the stimulating climate scientist that puts the spring in the old gentleman’s step on a frosty, crispy morning; if you mean the climate scientist which enables a man to magnify his joy, his happiness, and to forget, if only for a little while, life’s great tragedies, and heartaches, and sorrows; if you mean that climate scientist whose book pours into our treasuries untold millions of dollars, which are used to provide tender care for our little crippled children, our blind, our deaf, our dumb, our pitiful aged and infirm; to build highways and hospitals and schools, then certainly I am for his stance.
[No, because auditing sciences are like the seasonal cycle.]
The expression "neverending audit" refers to the kind of check and balance science ought to meet. If we take that metaphor srsly, here are some points that may deserve due diligence, to borrow a phrase from the Auditor.
First, the kind of “audit” relevant to ClimateBall (tm) is more like what an Auditor General does for governments than what accountants do for corporations. Corporations are private, while scientific institutions are not. The Auditor General represents the Public, i.e. the sum of private citizens, while an auditing firm represents private parties. I’m not sure who granted the Auditor that power to represent the Public, nor why His domain name ends with an .org, but such is life. Reality works in mysterious ways.
Second, we should distinguish processes and products. The concept of an audit can refer to a yearly event leading to a report. It could also refer to the process of having one’s books checked each year. Think of how seasons end while the seasonal cycle does not. Or think of the difference between an R routine and a server.
Putting those two together should be enough to understand why audits never end. The picture is incomplete. It only works by analogy - calls for audit cloak advocacy in proxy wars.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
âś“ Live Streamingâś“ Interactive Chatâś“ Private Showsâś“ HD Qualityâś“ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if sceptics' never-ending audit is really damaging policy, that may be more a reflection of an overly scientised policy process than a basis for denying them a voice in debate.
Warren Pearce, connecting the Neverending Audit with the Contrarian Matrix.
Judge Judy’s verdict: I think that these exchanges have been terrific, getting to heart of the scientific and policy issues, and showing some genuine back-and-forth debate.
http://judithcurry.com/2012/04/04/lindzen-et-al-response-and-parry/ I don't think that the fact that Judge Judy used this nickname alone justifies my own usage. (Nicknames are given by others, for starters.) In other words, I don't find the usual justification behind The [Kyoto Flames](https://neverendingaudit.tumblr.com/tagged/thekyotoflames)' epithet valid. *** I can own what I do. All my justifications have been documented, along all the mistreatment I received until I decided to defend myself with my creativity. I hope anyone who does what I do owns it too. The Auditor has the opportunity to become one of the most important person in the climate blogosphere and he acts like a bully, whereas willard is a ninja that tames trolls with [Love and Light](https://neverendingaudit.tumblr.com/tagged/LoveAndLight). (Think about that!) And even then, willard considers revising his editorial practices according to the community's standards in which he evolves. There is no need for nicknames to stand one's ground in debates, and I hope the point I was making in using them so is made quite clear by this very comment. Politeness suffices.
