#misplacement

Celsius Sues StakeHound Over Alleged $150M Token Misplacement

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

Share this article

Bankrupt crypto lender, Celsius, has taken legal action against StakeHound, the liquid staking platform. The lawsuit centers around StakeHound’s alleged failure to return $150 million worth of ETH, MATIC, DOT and other tokens:

“StakeHound continues to wrongfully withhold or otherwise deprive Celsius of possession of all of these valuable Native [ETH] Tokens.”

In the legal documents submitted to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Celsius claims that it had entrusted StakeHound with 25,000 staked ETH, 35,000 native ETH, 40 million MATIC and 66,000 DOT in 2021. These tokens were exchanged for StakeHound’s liquid staking tokens or “stTokens” and were valued at over $150 million at the time of the exchange.

The dispute escalated when StakeHound filed an arbitration agreement against Celsius in Switzerland following Celsius’s bankruptcy announcement. In its filing, StakeHound asserted it was under no obligation to return the stTokens for other tokens. Furthermore, StakeHound has stated it lost the keys to the 35,000 ETH belonging to Celsius and hence can’t return these tokens:

“Because keys associated with the 35,000 Celsius ETH (plus Rewards) allegedly had been misplaced, StakeHound not only was relieved of its obligation to return those tokens, StakeHound also was no longer required to return the 25,000 Celsius ETH (plus Rewards) in their entirety.”

Reacting to StakeHound’s arbitration filing, Celsius has argued that it is a violation of Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. This particular section is known as the “automatic stay,” which prevents most creditors from initiating debt collection or legal action against an entity that has filed for bankruptcy:

“When confronted with its breaches of contract and other duties, StakeHound willfully violated the automatic stay […] StakeHound since has ignored Celsius’ demand that the Swiss arbitration be withdrawn based on the automatic stay.”

Share this article

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push(); #Celsius #Sues #StakeHound #Alleged #150M #Token #Misplacement

The sun in the night,

A  gleam of bright light,

Sirens in sight,