#meta reflection

Building on the earlier discussion of how victimhood framing traps Jellal, this section asks: what if that was the story’s final answer? What if he was never meant to be accountable? And what does that make Jerza’s story become?

As discussed throughout, without agency, Jellal’s guilt loops without resolution. But if we accept this as intentional framing, we face a larger issue: the story keeps demanding atonement while refusing to define sin,

Playing devil’s advocate here, if we accept the idea that Jellal had no agency in his actions at all—that everything he did was purely the result of possession, manipulation, and external forces and nothing of his own accord—then the entire framework of his atonement collapses.

I can’t stress this point enough: 

You simply cannot SEEK redemption for a SIN that was NEVER yours.

You CANNOT be forgiven for something you NEVER consciously did.

And yet, the narrative keeps showing us different.

It keeps asking for Jellal to repent.

It keeps showing Erza forgiving.

But for what?

Without Accountability, Jerza Becomes Mutual Victimhood, Not Reconciliation

If Jellal is framed as a complete victim, Jerza stops being a story about forgiveness and healing. It instead becomes a story of two people hurt by the world, comforting each other through the shared tragedy.

That is not inherently a bad story.

But it’s not the story we were told.

The canon built its emotional beats on the idea of guilt, atonement and redemption. Yet it refuses to define the sin. If Jellal bears no blame, what exactly is being forgiven? What is being repaired?

This is the question that keeps spinning in my head.

The Emotional Tension Evaporates 

Without accountability, there’s no real conflict between them:

No reckoning of choices.

No risk of confrontation.

No evolution of their bond.

Their dynamic becomes a long pause—static, unresolved. Just like I expressed before, without something to atone for—Jellal’s guilt becomes a hollow loop. Without something to confront, Erza’s forgiveness becomes performative.

Why We Cared…Loses Meaning 

What draws people to Jerza isn’t just the tragedy—it’s the hope of reconciliation, of confronting past pain and growing from it.

But if Jellal is simply a passive sufferer, and Erza is simply a forgiving saint, what is there left to explore?

There’s no conflict.

There’s no growth.

Just an endless cycle of guilt and grace that never evolves.

The Emotional Climax Becomes Empty 

If Jellal did nothing wrong, why does it take so long to resolve their tension?

Why the hesitation?

Why the silence?

Why the shame?

You cannot build an emotional climax around a wound you refuse to define. The result is a relationship that feels haunted by a phantom pain — present, but never acknowledged.

Erza’s Role: Forgiveness Without Closure 

Erza’s care for Jellal is unquestionable. She is his anchor, his moral guide after everything became lost to him. But caring for someone doesn’t mean shielding them from emotional growth.

By never demanding Jellal to face his actions, Erza’s forgiveness becomes her only narrative function. She’s not allowed to express anger, to process her hurt, or to ask the hard questions.

This isn’t a flaw in Erza as a person — it’s a limitation placed on her by the narrative.

She’s positioned as the saviour 

But she’s denied the space to be a survivor 

Her pain is used to validate Jellals guilt, not heal her own wounds.

The result is emotional labor without catharsis.

Strength without agency.

The Narrative Risks Corrupting Her

If we go with the timeline of canon events between Jellal and Erza, we find out that Erza has been told multiple times by others pertaining to Jellal that ‘he was not in control’ of what happened in the TOH.

Azuma tells her during their fight. Ultear too. 

So by now she knows that Jellal is not at fault for what happened. Before the Nirvana arc, she didn’t and her anger was justified. But now the narrative has changed that, and you would assume that her view on Jellal would change too.

But instead the story keeps making her insist on Jellal’s atonement and repentance.

Why?

Why is she demanding repentance from a man who has been declared innocent? Why is she forgiving a person who was not in control of the harm done towards her? Why did it take so long to reconcile with him? Why didn’t her anger direct outwards to those actually at fault? Like Ultear? 

See, all of this brings up contradictions.

It makes no sense for Erza to be forgiving Jellal and or urging him to repent when she herself has been told his name is cleared of it. Why is it she is telling him to seek repentance instead of giving him the missing piece for his logic?

That he is a victim too.

The reason I say Erza should tell him is because he’s the one looking at her for direction, yet she knowingly is telling him to repent, enforcing the idea he did sin and continuing the perpetual loop, but she knows what has truly happened. Like Ultear can tell him, but Erza is the one who’s judgement clearly means the most and guides him and he takes her word like law.

And whether she means to or not, what Erza is doing to Jellal by withholding this narrative for him is inherently cruel. To let him believe a lie for convenience rather than explaining the way things really were.

But of course, I am not villainising Erza for this. In fact I can understand where the avoidance of this conversation could come from. Because maybe she doesn’t want to open up that trauma again. She wants to close it off cleanly because revisiting it could mean facing other things she might not be ready for. 

And rather than her forgiveness being for Jellal, maybe it could be a form of closure for herself?

In the sense that even if he wasn’t in control, since he is the most resonant and reappearing figure in all of this, she has a place to point blame. A sound board basically. And telling him she forgives him, maybe that's her way of making amends of the past.

But as human as this mechanism is, it’s not only damaging to Erza, but deeply damaging to Jellal.

As he will be living convinced of a lie that shapes his own identity and beliefs, all for the convenience and comfort of another. For the sake of not having the difficult conversations, Jellal’s self worth is trapped in an unjust self-loathing spiral.

And this is just painful for the both of them.

The Emotional Stagnation Hurts Both of Them

So to summarise, when Jellal’s accountability is avoided in the story, both characters are robbed of meaningful and necessary growth.

Jellal remains trapped in guilt that he’s never allowed to own or resolve.

Erza remains trapped in forgiveness that’s never allowed to fully mean anything and possibly exists only to put a balm over the surface of haunting wounds.

They are both stuck in emotional purgatory; circling the same unresolved tension because the narrative refuses to let them confront the truth.

Then this is not a story of healing.

It’s a story of suppression.

✦•

So… What Story Are We Telling?

If we truly believe Jellal is not accountable, then the canon needs to stop asking him to repent.

Because you cannot atone for what you didn’t do.

You can’t be redeemed if you were never condemned.

If Jellal was just a man of misfortune, then his arc should have focused on healing from victimhood:

With compassion, not punishment 

With clarity, not confusion.

Erza’s role would shift too:

No longer as the forgiver 

But the witness.

Someone who shares his pain, rather than carrying the emotional labor of absolution.

That would be a different story. A valid one.

But it’s not the story we were given.

Instead, canon keeps demanding atonement whilst denying sin. It keeps demanding forgiveness whilst denying harm. And for that, this contradiction sits at the heart of Jerza — unresolved and unspoken.

✦•

The Fork in the Road 

The truth is simple:

If Jellal is not accountable, then we need to stop pretending forgiveness is the answer 

If Erza’s pain is real, then we need to give it a place to land.

If Jerza is meant to be a story of love overcoming the past, then that past has to be named.

Otherwise we’re not watching a redemption arc.

We’re watching two characters orbiting around a love they could have, but aren’t allowed to earn it.

Part 8 explored a difficult but necessary question: What if Jellal was never meant to be accountable? Not as a flaw, but as an intentional framing choice.

However before I get onto truly closing this section, there’s something more I would like to highlight, something I've noticed in regards to Jellal’s character despite his reality.

✦✦✦✧✦✦✦

Unforgiven By Design: The Inverse Cost of Compassion 

I’ll admit this one of the more personally resonant points in my whole meta, and I hold my hands up to if anything I say goes out of line and you can call me out on it, but still—I feel this must be said.

As the story stands, there is a clear effort to say Jellal is a victim of what happened to him (even if it does change this depending on the plot), but us as an audience are meant to at least believe ‘Jellal is innocent.’ and that he is a good guy.

But the thing is, even though the story went all this way to avoid his name from being slandered, it happened anyway. Narratively people may accept the fact Jellal was a victim, but emotionally? That’s not the case.

And this is an occurrence both in-verse and in fandom.

Let me go into what I mean.

Jellal is considered technically ‘redeemed’— he turned himself in, gave up power, never made excuses for what he did or even expressed anger for how he was treated (despite being probably the most valid out of all the villains). Yet emotionally, in both canon and fandom, he’s treated as if his redemption doesn’t matter/or like it didn’t happen in the first place.

His guilt becomes a punchline. His remorse is dismissed as excessive. His pain is mocked rather than mourned.

And it doesn’t make sense. 

Someone who has had their entire life destroyed beyond measure and is bearing the consequences every time he is on screen, why is he being humiliated like this or treated so disrespectfully?

And let’s be clear here: this sort of behavior isn’t just critique, but humiliation masked as humour.

Calling him a loser?

Laughing at his breakdowns?

Celebrating his failures with joy rather than critical thought?

That’s not emotional engagement. That’s bullying.

The hypocrisy becomes obvious when compared to how other characters are treated. 

Gray for example, has trauma rooted in loss and self-destruction. His overuse of Iced Shell may be teased, but his pain is handled with empathy. His suicidal moments are mourned, not memed.

But for Jellal?

He is mocked for being suicidal and was canonically struck for it.

Laughed at for the intensity of his devotion to Erza.

Reduced to a shell of a man just to preserve Erza’s pedestal.

His trauma — which is just as severe, just as valid, just as rooted in abuse— is treated like a joke.

And for the life of me I can’t understand why.

We can cry and hurt for characters like Lucy, Erza, Natsu, Gray for their pain. Even other villains like Zeref, Ultear, Irene, August etc. But Jellal? He is barely extended the same sentiment. 

It doesn’t make sense.

This discrepancy exposes a deeper fandom psychology: selective empathy. It’s not about what the character went through—it’s about how their pain makes us feel. Gray’s grief is familiar and digestible. Jellal’s guilt is uncomfortable and unresolved. 

So instead of facing it, the fandom simplifies him, flattens him, and mocks him.

There are terms that gets thrown about in regard to Jellal and his intense guilt/self loathing. 

(I won’t name them because the point of this message isn’t to name and shame but to reflect) 

They get thrown around and whilst it may be a joke in nature, the use of it seems reductive to his repentance and disrespecting of it.

Especially when these terms are the thing mainly used to describe his intense relationship with guilt, rather than to understand it, but to lowkey pigeonhole it or even ridicule it in some cases.

The joke doesn’t even fit here for Jellal in my opinion.

What more do you want from a redemption arc if not guilt?? Isn’t the fact someone feels bad about what they did the defining point of redemptions in Fairy Tail?

Jellal gave up his freedom, something he was intensely attached to from young. He sought no praise for it. He held himself accountable even when the narrative refused to let him heal. 

If remorse is the requirement for empathy, he fulfilled it over and over.

So then why is he still the target?

Because vulnerability without protection becomes easy to exploit.

The story doesn’t protect Jellal emotionally— so neither does the fandom.

If people truly saw him as a victim, they wouldn’t celebrate his suffering. They wouldn’t mock him for the very guilt and brokenness that, if showing in another character, would be treated as sacred.

To understand where I'm coming from: let me flip the lens.

Imagine if people laughed at Erza’s past as a slave or for losing her eye? Or mocked Lucy for crying over her controlling father when he died? Or ridiculed Wendy for begging to be stronger enough?

Or just to make it less female leaning. What if people mocked Natsu for looking for Igneel for years upon years? Or Gray for his survivors' guilt?  

There wouldn’t just be backlash.

There would be full on outrage.

So then why is it acceptable for Jellal, a man who lost his life and had it broken irreparably?

The answer is uncomfortable: because his suffering makes people uneasy. 

His story lacks resolution, and instead of confronting that narrative failure, people displace the discomfort onto him. They mock him because it’s easier than reconciling with what he represents— a character failed by both writing and reception.

This is why drawing the line between critique and cruelty matters.

Saying “Jellal frustrates me, I wish he did more” is valid.

Saying “He’s pathetic, a coward, does nothing for the story or for others, he’s dead weight and deserves to suffer” is not.

That is not discourse anymore. 

That’s degradation.

And let’s not pretend that kind of ridicule reflects any care. If you mock a character’s most vulnerable moments and call it love, that isn’t respect—it’s convenience.

Doesn’t matter if it was a one off or if it was multiple times, the impulse itself inherently cruel in nature. 

And the more it happens, the clearer it becomes: this isn't about Jellal anymore. It's about our own discomfort, our own need for someone to carry the weight of unresolved emotion. 

And cruelty, when repeated, starts to reflect more on the one inflicting it than the character enduring it.

If anyone wants to act like I'm reaching or thinking too deep into it.

Let me ask you this: imagine you were the one being talked about the way that Jellal is?

That you’re pathetic. A coward. A good for nothing. Does nothing for anyone etc.

Is that still a joke?

Put yourself in those shoes and tell me if that is not inherently cruel and even abusive in nature. 

And before anyone says “he’s just a character”, then why are there people hating him so hard then?

Exactly.

Though i’ll be honest, I don’t know if this treatment exists because the story didn’t commit to what it had set out for him, or that hate and cruelty just needs a place to land and he is the most convenient for it. 

Jellal being treated the way he is despite the story’s attempts to absolve his name, makes me wonder if the story was clear with him would he have been saved the degradation and given some respect, or was he always just going to be the victim of petty words and venom because it’s easy?

I guess we’ll never know.

As of now Jellal Fernandes exists in a paradox. He is spared narratively, but condemned emotionally. The arc suggests forgiveness, but the execution denies him healing or mercy. He is ‘forgiven’ on paper, but never embraced as human—in-verse or largely in fandom.

When we laugh at his pain while mourning others’, we have to ask ourselves:

Is this really about the character? Or is it about our discomfort with characters who are messy, remorseful, and emotionally unresolved? Or is it just anger at what’s unresolved that needs a place to land? Or just plain cruelty?

I’m not saying I’ve never laughed at a character unfairly. But when I look at Jellal and the unrelenting degradation and humiliation he receives just for existing, I see someone who deserves better — not just from the story, but from all of us.

If we say we care about redemption, we must extend compassion to those who seek it.

If we say we care about characters, we must stop turning their suffering into spectacle.

Otherwise, what we’re protecting isn’t the story—it’s our own comfort at the expense of someone else’s pain.

✦•

All of this—the mockery, the flattening, the selective empathy—stems from a deeper failure: the story never gives Jellal the emotional framework to truly exist. 

He’s not allowed to grow, only to grieve. And Erza? She’s not allowed to struggle, only to forgive. Together, their pain becomes background noise for a love that’s never fully allowed to live. They are both caught in roles written for audience comfort, not character truth.

Which brings us back to the heart of this critique—not just about guilt or redemption, but about what happens when characters are reduced to symbols.

When love becomes metaphor, and healing becomes performance.

When characters like Jellal and Erza stop being people, and start being projections.

That’s where we go onto Part 9 of this critique.

We saw how stripping him of agency turns Jerza into a story of mutual victimhood, not reconciliation.

It robs their relationship of emotional tension, makes their conflict feel hollow, and denies both characters the closure their arcs were built to deliver.

Without accountability, forgiveness becomes performative.

Love becomes a bandage, not a bridge.

Their bond stagnates — suspended in symbolism, never allowed to grow.

This isn’t a critique of Jellal or Erza as characters.

It’s a critique of a narrative that refuses to let them live beyond their assigned roles.

Which brings us to the heart of the matter:

✦ ━━━━━━━━ ❖✶⌖✶❖ ━━━━━━━━ ✦

Part 9: Erza and Jellal Deserve Better Than Symbolism

“Jerza deserves to be more than an idea — they deserve the space to feel real, flawed, and fully alive.”

Earlier, we looked at what Jerza’s emotional arc could have been. But now we’ll explore why it wasn’t — why all the points dregged up in argument never were considered and for what reason.

Because the heart of the issue runs much deeper: Symbolism.

They were never treated as people. They became ideas — symbols of forgiveness and redemption — at the expense of their humanity.

In this next section, we’ll explore how symbolism — whilst powerful — flattened their humanity, and limited both characters rather than elevated them. 

We’ll also reinforce the core argument of how giving them back their agency would have made Jerza not weaker, but stronger.

✦•

In canon, Jerza has been elevated into symbols:

Jellal as the fallen man seeking atonement.

Erza as the unwavering forgiver.

Together, a symbol of hope, redemption and grace.

But in the process, their humanity was flattened.

If we go back to the root of it, Jerza was never about “light and darkness.” 

It was about two broken people—survivors of shared trauma—trying to navigate the aftermath of what was done to them and what they did to each other. Yet, the story chose aesthetics over depth, reducing them to roles rather than people.

But in doing so, they became a performance of love and healing, instead of being participants in it.

Forgiveness Without Accountability Hollowed Their Bond

True forgiveness is not a gift given because someone is pitiful or tragic.                                                

It’s a choice made in response to remorse, responsibility, and change.

In Jerza’s case, forgiveness should have been about Erza choosing to forgive Jellal because he took ownership of his actions—not because she is the “perfect” partner who exists to redeem him. Without that foundation, as stated before, her forgiveness becomes emotional labor, not emotional  resolution.

And this doesn’t just diminish their arcs individually.

It also robs the audience of the emotional payoff we’re led to expect.

Jellal’s atonement feels shallow.

Erza’s growth is overshadowed by her role as “the forgiver.”

Their relationship becomes static, suspended in symbolism, never earning the depth it could have reached.

Fandom & Narrative Pressures: The Feedback Loop of Idealisation 

As explored in previous sections, some of this dynamic is born from fandom itself.

Jellal’s status as a tragic figure—damaged but redeemable—makes it emotionally easier for fans to frame him as a pure victim. The cleaner the tragedy, the easier it is to love him without discomfort. But of course, that same impulse erases his complexity.

When a character is only allowed to be saved, never challenged, their arc stagnates.

The writers, whether consciously or not, respond to these pressures.

Instead of confronting Jellal’s responsibility, they double down on guilt-as-redemption.

Instead of giving Erza space to process her own pain, they keep her in the role of moral compass.

What could have been a raw, painful and beautiful story of mutual healing, becomes a cycle of emotional avoidance.

The desire to protect beloved characters from moral complexity ends up diminishing them.

The Opportunity They Deserve 

Jerza could have been a love story that embraced the messiness of trauma, responsibility, and growth.

The set up was all there.

Imagine:

Jellal, acknowledging not just that he was manipulated, but that he made choices within that manipulation.

Erza, confronting the pain of loving someone who hurt her, not as a weakness, but as her right to feel and express.

Both of them allowed to speak the unsaid, to break free from their symbolic roles and meet as equals—not savior and sinner, but as two wounded people choosing to rebuild.

That is the Jerza that could have been.

A relationship grounded in honesty, not performance.

A story where love doesn’t erase the past, but helps carry it with clarity and consent.

Breaking Free from Symbolism: A New Paradigm 

This isn’t about tearing down Jerza.

It’s about liberating it.

“They deserve to be more than symbols of redemption and forgiveness. They deserve to be people.”

They deserve to be people who:

Hurt. 

Heal. 

Make mistakes. 

Take responsibility.

Forgive with clarity.

Grow with intention.

Jerza was poised to be that kind of story. But it was never given the narrative space to happen.

And that’s the tragedy in all of it—not Jellal’s fall, not Erza’s suffering—but the refusal to let them live beyond the roles assigned to them.

Why This Critique Matters

This isn’t an attack on fans who love Jerza.

It’s a call to imagine more for them.

“No one needs to be perfect. But they do need to be honest. And that includes the narrative itself.”

Jerza can still be beautiful. But not as a frozen image of guilt and grace.

They deserve a story that allows them to breathe—to hurt each other, to face it, to heal—not because it’s easy, but because it’s what they need to truly set foot on the road to recovery.

In giving them accountability, we give them freedom.

Freedom to grow.

Freedom to choose each other fully, not out of penance or obligation, but with open eyes.

Freedom to love beyond guilt, beyond symbolism, into something human.

They were turned into ideals: symbols of forgiveness and redemption. But Jerza was never meant to be untouchable. They were meant to be human. To stumble, to clash, to grow.

By letting them be people—not ideas—we give them the story they always deserved.

✦ ━━━━━━━━ ❖✶✎✶❖ ━━━━━━━━ ✦

Part 10: Closing Thoughts & Call to Discussion 

“This isn’t a call to destroy Jerza — it’s a call to set it free. To let it be messy, real, and earned.”

As I have said before, this post isn’t meant to tear Jerza down. It’s meant to hold space for what it could have been — and what it still could be, if we’re willing to look beyond idealisation and into emotional honesty.

Love doesn’t have to be perfect to be powerful.                                           But it does have to be truthful.

Jerza deserves a chance at that reality.                                                           One where both Jellal and Erza are allowed to be flawed, hurt and human. Where they can grow — not just individually, but together — by facing the past, not erasing it.

TLDR;

Since there has been so much that has been covered in depth throughout the course of this post, I'll end it here with a brief recap of the main points and a short summary of the most vital takeaways from the post to reflect on.

Main Points of ‘Why Accountability is the Missing Piece between Jerza’ summarised:

Jellal’s “Redemption” Lacks Weight

His “sins” are never clearly defined.

He’s stuck in guilt loops without ever processing why he’s guilty.

Atonement without ownership = hollow narrative.

Victimhood Replaces Accountability

Framing Jellal as only a victim flattens his arc.

Redemption isn’t about being pitiful—it’s about owning your past and growing from it.

Erza’s Emotional Agency is Undermined

She forgives, but never gets space to process her hurt.

Her strength becomes silent endurance, not active healing.

Without Jellal’s accountability, her forgiveness feels performative.

Jerza’s Dynamic Stagnates Without Truth

Their relationship becomes symbolic: guilt & grace on loop.

No real conversations. No reckoning. No mutual healing.

Love can’t fix what’s never confronted.

Accountability Would Strengthen Jerza, Not Destroy It

Owning his actions would give Jellal agency.

It would let Erza express her pain fully.

Their bond could evolve from shared trauma to genuine, earned connection.

Fandom & Narrative Both Avoid Complexity

Simplifying Jerza protects the fantasy but weakens the story.

Accountability isn’t punishment—it’s depth.

They don’t need to be “perfect.” They need to be human.

And now going on to what I hope are the vital takeaways::

1. Letting Them Be People, Not Symbols

At its heart, Jerza was never just about aesthetics.

It was about survival. Pain. Regret.

Two people shaped by shared trauma, trying to figure out what remains between them.

But the narrative elevated them into untouchable symbols:

Jellal, the tragic man to be forgiven.

Erza, the saintly woman whose love redeems.

In doing so, it stripped away their emotional truth.

To truly honour their bond, they need to be allowed to step down from the pedestal.

To sin. To break. To rebuild.

To choose each other with clear eyes, not as ideas, but as people.

2. Accountability Doesn’t Weaken Jerza — It Sets It Free

Accountability isn’t punishment.

It’s clarity.

Letting Jellal be accountable wouldn’t erase his humanity — it would restore it. 

It would give Erza’s forgiveness weight.

It would give their relationship depth.

Let him sin, then grow.

Let her break, then heal.

Let them speak the unsaid.

Let them step out of this emotional purgatory.

A love story where both can stand, not because their pain was ignored, but because it was faced — that would be the most powerful version of Jerza we’ve never seen.

3. This Isn’t About Blame — It’s About Potential

This isn’t a judgment of the fans who love Jerza.

It’s a critique of how the story chose to simplify what could have been so much richer.

Jellal isn’t less lovable because he’s flawed.

Erza isn’t weaker for expressing her pain.

Their love isn’t diminished by complexity.

In fact, it’s through that complexity that their relationship could truly resonate.

Jerza’s potential was always there.

The tragedy isn’t that they were broken.

It’s that the story never lets them heal properly.

4. Invitation to Reflect & Discuss

This isn’t the “final word” by any means.

It’s an invitation. 

To extend the conversation.

How do you think Jellal’s accountability could have shaped Jerza’s journey 

What would Erza’s arc have looked like if she’d been given space to confront her pain?

How could their reconciliation have been made more meaningful, and more human?

I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Let’s talk about what this ship could be — not to discard it, but to imagine it free from the limits that held it back.

Final Thought

The arguments made throughout the post were extensive and I apologise at points if I repeated myself at times when expanding on things or it just seemed like I was harping on. But I hope by the end of it some of the points do open new conversations and new perspectives on Jellal, Erza and Jerza as a whole and we begin to see things beyond binary lenses.

So thank you to each and every person who has taken the time to read all this, before I close off I will say my last pieces to really hone in the heart of this post.

Accountability isn’t about punishment—it’s about reclamation. 

For Jellal, it means reclaiming agency over his story, no longer defined solely by victimhood.

For Erza, it means reclaiming her right to confront, to feel, to heal on her own terms.

Only through this shared act of ownership, can their bond move beyond symbolism into something fully human.

That’s why I say: 

“Let Jellal be accountable. Not because he’s evil. Not to punish him. But because it’s the only way for them both to finally say the unsaid. To break the silence. To step out of this emotional purgatory.”

“They deserve a love built on truth — not silence.”

And so do we, as those who love them.

⟡ Thank you for taking your time to read this ⟡

-Yami ᢉ𐭩

✦ ━━━━━━━━ ✦⌬⧨✧⌖✎✦ ━━━━━━━━ ✦

✦ End of Series Return to Masterpost ←

or