#mcnew

A Washington state judge has dismissed claims in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of Charleena Lyles, a pregnant mother of four who was killed by Seattle police.

The Jan. 4 summary judgment by King County Superior Court Judge Julie Spector dismissed the claims against Officers Jason Anderson and Steven McNew with prejudice, according to The Seattle Times. When a case is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled but may be appealed to a higher court.

A lawsuit filed against the city by Lyles’ family still stands.

Lyles, 30, was fatally shot on June 18, 2017, after reporting a burglary at her Northeast Seattle apartment. Anderson and McNew said Lyles confronted them at the scene and came after them with a knife. She was shot seven times and died at the scene.

In the wake of the shooting, questions were raised about why the officers did not use nonlethal force on Lyles, who weighed less than 100 pounds and had mental health issues.

According to transcripts of interviews with the officers, when Lyles moved toward them with the knife, McNew asked Anderson to use a Taser on her. Anderson said he did not have his Taser — he had left it in his locker — and they both shot her.

Three of her children were in the apartment at the time of the shooting. According to a transcript of McNew’s interview, “one of the little babies” crawled into the room after the shooting and rested “his head against” his mother’s body.

Steve McNew delves into crypto and NFT safety at Dollars20/20

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

Steve McNew, a globally recognized blockchain and electronic asset investigator, delivers a uncommon glimpse into the twisted maze of crypto fraud and disputes at Income20/20, the world’s most well known fintech event.

Cryptocurrencies have always been shrouded in an air of enigma from their secretive genesis. As these digital belongings infiltrate the mainstream, the shadows extend further to the gray spots of criminal offense and legality.

At the coronary heart of McNew’s discourse lies an intriguing puzzle – how does one particular trace transactions in an ecosystem created for anonymity? 

The emergence of cryptocurrency has included an ground breaking but demanding dimension to asset management. The absence of a centralized technique adds a water-proof layer of stability but concurrently renders monitoring fraudulent activities a herculean endeavor.

But not all is dropped in this elusive maze. McNew’s agency, FTI Consulting, has established a electronic asset lab with an remarkable array of blockchain forensic tools. The reason? To trace on-chain transactions and detect anomalies in the crypto sea. 

Every single tool provides a new standpoint, validating its predecessor’s final results and supplementing gaps in its facts – a formidable, multi-pronged tactic to resolving electronic puzzles.

The blockchain fortress: impregnable but not indomitable

In an enlightening disclosure, McNew emphasizes that, inspite of the myriad of fraud incidents, the incredibly backbone of the cryptocurrency earth — the blockchain — has remained impregnable. 

Its ironclad architecture has withstood numerous tries at compromise. Even so, he promptly notes that the entities crafted on this business foundation — good contracts, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, and exchanges — are often vulnerable to exploitation. 

Interestingly, these factors of vulnerability, which frequently come to be the conduits for fraud, are not inherent flaws of blockchain know-how. Alternatively, they expose the lapses in human implementation and the relentless inventiveness of those people intent on manipulation.

Unraveling the ties with NFTs

The crypto universe is not confined to bitcoins (BTC) and altcoins. Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have just lately acquired the limelight, not generally for the ideal explanations. 

McNew recounts an eyebrow-elevating tale of a company’s cryptocurrency mysteriously evaporating, only to resurface in the wallets of its govt, hid inside of a myriad of NFTs.

This narrative underscores a grim actuality: theft is no longer about using and running it is about getting, hiding, and then discreetly making the most of the spoils. 

The obstacle was deciding the NFTs’ worthy of, accrued financial rewards, and the shadowy transactions that slipped under the radar. In McNew’s terms, it is a curious concern of “what the heck is it really worth?” when dealing with NFTs linked to illicit crypto routines.

NFTs, as a result, pose a new frontier in electronic asset fraud that necessitates a keen knowledge of the NFT ecosystem.

Untangling the threads of digital asset disputes

Navigating the labyrinthine planet of cryptocurrency fraud is an endeavor that goes further than simply uncovering the scam. It mandates the arduous activity of resolving ensuing authorized disputes. 

Photograph Sherlock Holmes for the digital age, blockchain buyers, whose clues are encrypted transactions and suspects. 

This impression is a truthful illustration of the worries confronted by crypto investigators this kind of as McNew, who has testified in about 170 blockchain and electronic property cases. His endeavor is not just fixing puzzles but creating lawful accountability in a realm exactly where millions can evaporate into the ether.

The complexity of these circumstances lies not just in the specialized comprehension of blockchain technological innovation but also in the frequently murky interpretation of the legislation in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Complicating issues is the simple fact that these digital fraudsters will need help to operate. As McNew underscores, their operations are entwined in sprawling networks, with a chain of transactions leading to an array of victims.

The so-referred to as “romance scam” or “pig butchering scam” is the most prevalent amongst the numerous swindles they orchestrate. Right here, fraudsters manipulate victims’ emotions to pilfer their crypto assets. Unraveling these cons calls for investigators chart transaction designs to determine the involved events and sketch out the scope of the fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/observe?v=6Y_7Qq3Rehs

Venturing more into the abyss of crypto fraud, McNew acquaints us with the elusive “peel chains” approach. As cryptic as it appears, this tactic is a method where by fraudsters step by step drain smaller amounts from their ill-gotten gains, making detection arduous.

Addressing this challenge necessitates a multifaceted evaluation checking out assorted wallet transactions, identifying ownership of many non-public wallets, and threading these varied things back to a solitary owner. 

Whilst fraught with complex intricacies and legal ambiguities, the cybercrime sphere is retained in check by the dedicated pursuit of justice by gurus like McNew, making certain that the swiftly growing realm of electronic property does not descend into an uncontrollable wild west.

How to mitigate crypto frauds in the long run

Venturing into the bewildering realm of crypto fraud, McNew’s riveting tales emphasize that these complexities, though tough, are not insurmountable obstacles. 

In truth, this intricate journey as a result of a labyrinth of cryptic pathways and concealed prospects is important to uphold justice in the new frontier of digital finance.

Navigating this broad, digitized landscape where assets and identities are cryptographically cloaked, the pursuit of real truth turns into an intricate chess recreation in opposition to elusive adversaries. 

Still, this very same problem spurs investigators, fueled by insatiable curiosity, technological comprehending, and a meticulous eye for depth.

As McNew’s narratives reveal, the crypto universe continues to evolve and adapt, with trouble-resolving procedures creating in tandem with rising complexities. The potential of electronic currencies is a dance among fraud and resolution, producing it a compelling and evolving area of exploration.

Comply with Us on Google Information

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push(); #Steve #McNew #delves #crypto #NFT #safety #Cash2020