Dec 20, 2022
Funny story, the "material implication paradoxes" become entirely a non-issue, and silly to call "paradoxes" when you drop the classical "A -> B" in favor of "A adjusts the probability of B".
Because the latter formulation is way closer to what people are actually expressing when they say "if A then B" sentences.
So course people will reject "if [false thing] then [another thing]" and "if [possible thing] then [unrelated true thing]": those are not true conditional probability relationships.
