Week 2 Reflection
When collecting data, researchers may believe they have discovered beliefs, norms, perceptions, attitudes, understandings of different realities, etc. However, as an active participant and primary instrument in the research process, the researcher must acknowledge that all information is filtered through their lived experience, which goes beyond their training as a researcher. Any given aspect of the research process has the potential ping a mental cue from a schema whereas any relatable items may bring forth a prior memory to the surface and impact the research experience. Therefore, it is critical that researchers closely reflect and examine their position, stance, understanding (or lack thereof) of a happening that occurs as they account for all of the aforementioned during a given research project. Researchers can examine the validity of their research through thoughtful reflection, dialogue with qualified investigators and applicable observants and possible participants, reexamination of existing literature. With any research project, research can first disclose their biases and assumptions, bringing forth any preconceived notions and beliefs. Second – while unsettling – researchers can also come to find out that the hypothesis may have to be rejected, and that while a new discovery may not come about, that their research can still add value in providing insights for future researchers. Next, given the nature of qualitative research, bringing together a research team with a view and values on a continuum can support a researcher in challenging assumptions, offering alternative perspectives, and adding to the diversity of thought, all of which can bring clarity to a researcher or research project. Additionally, have a deep understanding of qualitative research methods will better position a researcher to have the skillset in collecting rich descriptives and field notes to synthesize and encapsulate the experiences of the research participants. Collectively, these efforts can shape the authenticity of the research and strengthen the rigor of a project.
