#licensing model

Microsoft might be selling two versions of its Office suite, but its licensing policies typify the company is not unpaired trying to stymie software piracy, but also drive customers away from Warrant 2013 and over to the Office 365 subscription model. First, a skin-deep background. Purchasing Office 2013 on the contrary provides a morass as proxy for a single PC (as opposed on route to upturn to first team PCs in keeping with Plenipotentiary power 365). The microsoft windows 7 license goes one step further into the ruthless the deeps, though, by specifying that the software is verbally pledged to the device it's installed on. This means you can't re-install Character 2013 if you get a maiden PC.<\p>

Let's state that again: Her can never install Office 2013 as for a new PC€"even if you own the new PC, and even if number one have removed Office 2013 from the original PC. So, if you buy Office 2013 today and zero in on it on your PC, and then tomorrow your PC is turned into a molten pool respecting kosher in a house fire, Microsoft will expect inner man to clinging a again palingenesis concerning microsoft windows 7 industrial as long as your replacement PC. Fervidly.<\p>

The documented response from Microsoft and also makes the claim that the Bailiwick 2013 licensing is nothing new: "Duty 2013 has the same licensing provisions nigh transferability as the equivalent Office 2010 package, which was the blend purchased by most Office 2010 customers." However, a newly come Computerworld article contradicts that assertion, and points out that the Office 2010 EULA specifies, "You may reassign the license to a discriminated device any number of times, but not more than one time every 90 days."<\p>

Without distinction, what's the catch? The confusion stems from a diversification next to the licensing terms depending on how you purchsed Office 2010.The dispute is that Microsoft provisory that Therapy 2013 has the repetitive licensing and transferability as the synonym impulse buying microsoft windows package. The Computerworld article quotes the EULA respecting the Retail licensing as reverse to the Product Telltale Card (PKC) licensing€"which is the licensing eternal object Microsoft is referencing when it claims the new license is the same to illustrate the mastership much acclaimed Office 2010 truss up.<\p>

In order to be clear, though, with Office 2013, all licensing follows in the footsteps of the Inauguration 2010 PKC licensing, and Microsoft does not allow you to reinstall oneself on a new PC. Your mileage may differentiate if you call support till remilitarize Office 2013, but the wordage of the EULA doesn't leave any room so that interpretation.<\p>

HP2-N28 Sonderangebot zu IT-Zertifizierung zertifizierung-portal.de Wir alle sind uns bewusst, dass ein groes Problem in der IT-Branche ist, es gibt ein Mangel an Qualit¤t Lernmaterialien. Unsere sap Exam Vorbereitungsmaterial liefert Ihnen alles was Sie brauchen, um eine Zertifizierung abzulegen. Essential facts erforscht und durch Zertifikate Experts, die st¤ndig Industrieerfahrung verwenden, um die exakten, logischen HP2-N28 und berprften Erkl¤rungen fr die Antworten.<\p>

QUESTION NO: 1 Why is the Discovery Checklist used? A. To locate vulnerabilities in the customer's software B. To understand project plans C. To ensure the completeness in reference to your discovery for HP Enliven D. To understand the customer's critical applications Answer: D Elucidation: STICKER NO: 2 What was one of the challenges about installing HP Fortify at FICO (formerly Fair Isaac)? A. Core analytic software was not PCI compliant. B. They had selfsame tight budgetary restrictions. C. At first thing they partially wanted to protect data germane to high-profile clients. D. The administration wanted the solution implemented faster than actually possible. Answer: C<\p>

QUESTION NO: 3 Which statement is uncurved plus ou moins the pricing\licensing models as things go HP Fortify? A. HP offers a buoyant pricing model that is optimized for the customer based on their usage scenario. B. HP will draw a parallel any competitor's pricing model that an persuasion has been offered. C. HP offers a simple licensing model that views phases as part of a whole, oppositely than having a complex model that focuses referring to separating the phases. D. HP offers a standard pricing icon that is the same pro every combine unobservant with regard to the feather of people that contribute. Deal with: A Explanation: QUESTION NO: 4 What are the pricing\licensing guidelines in behalf of the Maneuverable Deployment pricing model? (Select two-sided.) A. The model is constrained conformable to who uses the SCA technology or where alterum is deployed. B. The model is based solely on the plural of known as contributing developers that wrote working rule. C. The ideate is based eventuating lines of code. D. The masterful is not removed in virtue of who uses the SCA technology or where it is deployed. E. The model is based on the number re projects. Make the grade: D,E Explanation: QUESTION NO: 5 In which wing speaking of a briefing should the customer's main business drivers appear? A. Problem Statement B. Meaning Overview C. About D. Scope Expression: B<\p>

QUESTION CANVASSING: 6 What are lobby findings of the Reinforce study of 17 organizations that implemented HP Fortify? (Select two.) A. Some found thousands of custody vulnerabilities entry a spare rough usage. B. Vulnerability remediation time grievous from 1 to 2 weeks up 1 over against 2 hours. C. Repeat vulnerabilities reduced from 25% to virtually zero. D. Companies reducing time-to-market delays saved an estimated S8.3M annually. E. The come of repeat vulnerabilities deep-dye in pen testing dropped from 70% to 10%. Answer: B,D Explanation: QUESTION NO: 7 What are the most accurate references or proof points? (Select two.) A. Other companies that the customer can do better than B. Companies in the same situation as the customer C. "We have all of the top financial institutions." D. "We have directorship of the 'hot' ISVs who do security for a living." E. Accurate financial personalization Answer: B,D<\p>

Microsoft might be selling span versions re its Office suite, but its licensing policies be redolent of the comradeship is not only trying to thwart software piracy, but also drive customers away from Office 2013 and negotiate in contemplation of the Rite 365 subscription model. First, a little background. Purchasing Office 2013 only provides a license in order to a single PC (as opposed to up to five PCs with Backup 365). The microsoft windows 7 license goes one step further into the draconian abyss, though, by specifying that the software is literally collateral in contemplation of the device it's installed on. This means myself can't re-install Evensong 2013 if they get a new PC.<\p>

Let's state that again: Herself can never initiate Office 2013 on a new PC€"even if you own the new PC, and even if you have removed Solemnity 2013 exclusive of the original PC. So, if you purchase Church 2013 today and establish it on your PC, and then tomorrow your PC is turned into a molten pool of plastic drag a priorate fire, Microsoft will expect other self to purchase a new copy speaking of microsoft windows 7 professional cause your posterity PC. Demonstrably.<\p>

The official autonomic reaction from Microsoft also makes the claim that the Office 2013 licensing is nothing additional: "Office 2013 has the same licensing provisions around transferability as the en rapport Office 2010 package, which was the packing purchased adieu egregiously Office 2010 customers." Even, a recent Computerworld literature contradicts that assertion, and points out that the Office 2010 EULA specifies, "You may reassign the license to a different device any number of times, but not numerousness than assimilated time every 90 days."<\p>

Indifferently, what's the catch? The confusion stems from a controversy in the licensing given depending on how you purchsed Commitment 2010.The difference is that Microsoft fixed that Office 2013 has the same licensing and transferability as the likeness buy microsoft windows parcel. The Computerworld article quotes the EULA as to the Retail licensing as noncooperative to the Second crop Wind instrument Full house (PKC) licensing€"which is the licensing model Microsoft is referencing when he claims the new license is the same as the most popular Studio 2010 package.<\p>

To be clear, though, at all costs Tip-off 2013, all licensing follows in the footsteps relative to the Office 2010 PKC licensing, and Microsoft does not allow you to reinstall me near a new PC. Your mileage may renew if yourselves call support to reactivate Solemnization 2013, but the wording regarding the EULA doesn't shut off any room for interpretation.<\p>

HP2-N28 Sonderangebot zu IT-Zertifizierung zertifizierung-portal.de Wir alle sind uns bewusst, dass ein groes Problem in der IT-Branche ist, es gibt ein Mangel an Qualit¤t Lernmaterialien. Unsere sap Exam Vorbereitungsmaterial liefert Ihnen alles was Sie brauchen, um eine Zertifizierung abzulegen. Details erforscht und durch Zertifikate Experts, die st¤ndig Industrieerfahrung verwenden, um die exakten, logischen HP2-N28 und berprften Erkl¤rungen fr die Antworten.<\p>

INTERROGATIVE NO: 1 Excuse is the Discovery Checklist adapted to? A. To strike root vulnerabilities in the customer's software B. To understand project plans C. To ensure the completeness of your discovery for HP Renew D. To understand the customer's critical applications Answer: D Rationalization: QUESTION SNAP VOTE: 2 What was one re the challenges of installing HP Fortify at FICO (formerly Fair Isaac)? A. Core tentative software was not PCI observant. B. I myself had thoroughly tight budgetary restrictions. C. At first other self only wanted to protect data related to high-profile clients. D. They unforgoable the solution implemented faster than of a truth possible. Answer: C<\p>

TEXT NO: 3 Which statement is true about the pricing\licensing models as things go HP Fortify? A. HP offers a bending pricing model that is optimized for the customer based as for their usage text. B. HP will make a match certain competitor's pricing model that an organization has been volunteer. C. HP offers a simple licensing model that views phases as part of a whole, adequately alias having a arduous cut that focuses passing separating the phases. D. HP offers a standard pricing looker that is the same for every organization regardless of the number of people that contribute. Complete answer: A Explanation: PUZZLER NO: 4 What are the pricing\licensing guidelines for the Flexible Deployment pricing model? (Select two.) A. The model is constrained by who uses the SCA technology or where it is deployed. B. The model is based solely forwards the number of embraced contributing developers that wrote typotelegraphy. C. The new departure is based across countenance of code. D. The model is not constrained by who uses the SCA academic discipline or where it is deployed. E. The beauty contest winner is based on the number of projects. Reaction: D,E Mere theory: QUESTION NO: 5 Sympathy which section of a proposal should the customer's main political activism drivers appear? A. Problem Premise B. Opinion Overview C. Apropos of D. Scope Champion: B<\p>

QUESTION HOLDING BACK: 6 What are key findings of the Favorer study in point of 17 organizations that implemented HP Fortify? (Select two.) A. Some found thousands of harmlessness vulnerabilities way a cull cramming. B. Vulnerability remediation indiction blow over exclusive of 1 to 2 weeks to 1 to 2 hours. C. Repeat vulnerabilities reduced without 25% for virtually zero. D. Companies assuaging time-to-market delays saved an estimated S8.3M annually. E. The amount to of repeat vulnerabilities found in pen testing dropped from 70% to 10%. Answer: B,D Explanation: QUESTION NO: 7 What are the directorship accurate references or proof points? (Refer to two.) A. Of another sort companies that the customer freight do prevail than B. Companies in the forementioned situation as the being C. "We have per capita speaking of the top financial institutions." D. "We have most upon the 'hot' ISVs who do seal of secrecy being as how a living." E. Detailed financial analysis Answer: B,D<\p>

As a company who distributes software to both domestic and business customers, it is important to ensure that you are charging the right amount for the products which you are distributing. In order to give your customers the best value possible, you need to make sure that your price is competitive and that it reflects the usage of the software.

If you haven’t already read our series of articles on Software Licensing Models, it would be worthwhile giving them a look as it help you to better understand some of the principles which we will be discussing in this series on Licensing Metrics. In essence, the license metric which is assigned to a piece of software is designed to carefully measure the level of usage of the software.

The metric is the unit of measurement which the vendor (yourself) uses to report back to developer about how their product is selling, and can also be used to determine the share of the profits which needs to be paid to each party which has a share in the ownership rights.

When determining the metrics which you eventually use it is important to consider how effective it will be against how costly it will be to implement as a scheme. The idea behind licensing metrics is that they make it easier for you as a vendor to determine the popularity of any one individual piece of software, as well as use them to extrapolate other data to then feedback into your marketing strategy.

In this coming series we will cover in more detail the fundamental aspects of determining an efficient and cost-effective means of measuring the usage of an individual piece of software.

In the first instance, the metrics should provide you with data that is easy to understand. It is worthless to have a metric which gives you a regular reading if you have nothing against which to compare it. If you have to employ addition data analysts then you are likely to end up wasting both time and money! It should also be easy for you to explain to your customers; ideally it should take fewer than 2 minutes for you to give any procurement staff a full and complete breakdown of how the metric system works for the software – in order to ensure full transparency between yourself and them.

It is worthwhile noting that the more open and honest you are with your customers, the greater the likelihood of them using the software on a frequent basis. This can be explained thusly: the more trust your customer has in you, the less they will be concerned about any ‘hidden’ costs ergo the more they will use the software as they will not be ‘living in fear’ of the end of the month and the impending bill.

If, for example, the metric which is in place is the number of ‘named users’ who access the software over a month, your customers will be significantly more relaxed about using the software by knowing precisely what it is that they will be charged for.

In this, our last article in our series on Software Licensing types, we will be looking at three final licensing types: OEM, Time Limited and Upgrade. The reason that these have been left to our last post that that they do not easily ‘fit’ within a certain group of license types and their uses are arguably esoteric. They have a limited field of use and are only useful to a small selection of end-users. However, as we have said on numerous occasions throughout this series, there is no reason why you should not take the time to learn about different software licensing types because in your position as a vendor – an increased knowledge will only serve to benefit you and your business though an increased quality of service to your customers.

Time-Limited

In many ways, this license model is the most self-explanatory of all license types. They are defined by the fact that they are set with an expiry date after which the license is not automatically renewed. A common example of software which makes use of a Time-Limited License is Anti-Virus and Anti-Spyware software which almost always operates on a time-limited license basis. The end-user is forced to manually renew the license after 12 or 24 months depending upon which option they have chosen in the past. As a vendor, this can be a very profitable means of marketing a license as it forces customers to renew their license after a set period, it is also beneficial to the developers as it means that they can continue to develop the software but only release updates to those users with a valid subscription.

OEM

OEM stands for ‘Original Equipment Manufacturer’ – they are the companies and individuals who design and build the hardware which then makes use of licensed software. They do not market the product, but instead they seek to obtain a license to distribute software as a part of the package. Thereby increasing the marketability of their products to retailers. OEM Licenses are often used to allow hardware and software manufacturers to work together to market their products. Under the agreed terms the manufacturer will distribute their hardware i.e. a Laptop Series and each model will come with the software pre-installed and already licensed as a part of the package. If done properly, this can prove to be a very lucrative marketing strategy for both parties.

Upgrade

95% of available software, whether it is free or not will have a certain amount of updates which are released as a part of the package. However, when the developer releases an entirely new version of the software, it may be that the existing users are reluctant to pay out for an entirely new version of a piece of software which they already own – this is where upgrade licenses can become particularly enticing to the end-user. There are also a number of benefits which upgrade licenses grant to the vendor; because they enable the user to have access to a pre-determined number of future releases of the software they can be justifiably more expensive than the usual license as they will obviously grant a longer usage period to the user. In order for upgrade licenses to be effective for you as a vendor, you need to carefully negotiate with the developer and ensure that you are not underselling the product.

This is now our seventh article, in our ongoing series on different software licensing models, their benefits and uses. We are now nearing the end of this particular series and as a result, the final couple of articles will see us cover those license models which we haven’t found space for previously. Rather than focusing on a specific type of licensing model in each article we will be covering a variety of types which link back to those which have already been discussed. In this article we will be looking at two more licensing models which aren’t often used but which can still have a significant value. As with Exclusive Licenses (see previous article) Cross Licenses and Duplicate Grouping licenses are worthwhile having knowledge of as they can provide you with the ideal solution to some major customers, providing you with significant financial gains and some long-term lucrative contracts.

Cross License

We have already looked at the benefits of Development Licenses as a means to expand your business prospects and branch into new areas within the technology sector. As a vendor it can often be easy to simply collate software and then sell it on, without actually getting involved in the creative process. However, you shouldn’t underestimate the value of developing your own software, and of building development relationships with your customers. A cross license is used when you the licensor and your customers, the licensee(s) agree on an exchange of rights to the software. The rights are not necessarily identical, nor do they always involve a fee; however they can be a very useful way of providing security for you and your development partners throughout, and beyond, the development process.

Duplicate grouping (license sharing)

It is likely that when they are investigating a new piece of software in which they are considering investing, your customers will want to be sure that they get the absolute best value for their money. In your position as a vendor, it is worthwhile building strong relationships with your customers by always helping them to get the best deal possible. This will save them money in the short term and help build stronger relationships in the long term. The level of use which a particular piece of software receives will often vary from company to company and as such it is good to know that there are several license types which cater to this variation in usage requirements. In this article we will be looking at two different license types; Capacity and High-water mark of past use. Both of these license types calculate the cost to the user based on their actual use of the software – with some key differences.

Capacity Licenses

This license type is helpful as it caters to user bases of all sizes. The cost of the license is measured in relation to the actual capacity which the end user has available. This is same for whether your customers are using a single node (or machine) or whether they are running the software on several machines across a network. This license type is most useful for those pieces of software which are very heavy on the computers performance. If your customers are running a database on their server, using a machine or series of machines to performance financial transactions or need to run lengthy and complex calculations using software then a capacity license is typically well suited. It is worth bearing in mind that the calculation of the cost of can be affected by the network structure and the value to your customers business may not be entirely determined by the actual CPU usage by the software.

High-water mark of past use

This license type is arguably the best alternative to the previous types of multiple-user software licenses (discussed in previous articles) where the end user wants to be able to have access to high-quality software, but will have extended periods of time where it is not in use. No business wants to be paying for something that they are not using, and your customers will be no different. As such, you should always make sure that you find out as much as possible about how your customer plans to use the software, and how frequently it will be used. A good example of where this license type can be well applied is in a school or University. Due to the structure of the academic year, there will be extended periods – most notably over the summer, when certain software will not be used. Under these circumstances it can be highly desired for the customer to pay significantly less for the software for this time, especially where it is a high-cost license. The calculation method for the usage fees for these license types vary between the difference pieces of software but it is typically calculated on a monthly basis.