#legitquest

B K Pavitra v Union of India, (2019) 16 SCC 129 wherein it had upheld the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservations

Arnesh Kumar Vs. State Of Bihar Judgment Dated 02-07-2014 of Supreme Court of India having citation (2014) 2 ALT CRL. 457 (SC) , (2014) 210 DLT 599 (SC) , (2014) 2 GLR 1848 , 2014 (3) ACR 2670 (SC) , (2014) 3 KLJ 330 , (2014) 86 ACC 568 , AIR 2014 SC 2756 , 2014 (II) DMC 546 SC , 2014 (3) KHC 69 , 2014 (3) J.L.J.R. 313 , (2014) CRILJ 3707 , 2014 3 Bom CR CRI 362 , 2014 (VII) AD SC 697 , (2014) 2 GLH 547 , 2014 Supp (4) CHN 73 (SC) , 2014 (III) CCR 144 (SC) , (2014) 8 SCC 273 , 2014 (3) MLJ (CRL) 353 SC , (2014) 3 PLJR 314 , 2014 (6) SCJ 219 , 2014 (4) MPHT 81 (SC) , 2014 (3) JCC 1529 , (2014) 3 RCR (CRIMINAL) 527 , (2015) 1 LW CRL 318 , (2014) 3 RLW 2171 (SC) , JT 2014 (7) SC 527 , (2014) 3 KLT 143 (SC) , (2014) 3 KCCR 1977 (SC) , 2014 (IV) MPJR (SC) 55 , 2014 (8) SCALE 250 , include bench Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASADHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE having Advocates For the Petitioner Rakesh Kumar, Kaushal Yadav, Advocates. For the Respondents Rudreshwar Singh, Samir Ali Khan, Aparna Jha, Braj K. Mishra, Abhishek Yadav, Advocates.