Another day, another Jihadi win in Labyrinth: The War on Terror. Like the digital version of Twilight Struggle really laid bare that game’s crushing balance problems by a) making it easy to play and b) keeping detailed statistics, I’m starting to worry Labyrinth is just as lopsided. I can win as the US by invading Afghanistan on turn 1 and just playing a very close and sharp game, but it’s hard, and there are number of event combos that can cripple you by shifting your posture to Soft and making it extremely difficult or impossible to counteract Jihads (I think if you *don’t invade Afghanistan on turn 1, or can’t due to a really unfortunate Opium card, you basically can’t win against competent opposition). As the US I’m about 50-50 in my recent online plays but I’ve never lost as the Jihadi and it’s rarely even been that close. What do you all think on this? I always play the 3-deck game so one side or the other can get a clean victory and avoid some weird end-of-deck gameyness, but I think the shorter games would probably be even worse for the US. #gaminginthetimeofcovid19 #labyrinththewaronterror #gmtgames https://www.instagram.com/p/CBrbv8khm3y/?igshid=170mzmimdn726






