"On ne s'en laisse plus conter. On écoute ce qu'on ressent." (AdÚle Haenel et Noémie Merlant)
by Joëlle Lehrer - L'Echo, October 2, 2019
So much beauty in each scene, gesture, and glance is incredibly rare in cinema. Awarded the Screenplay Prize at Cannes, Céline Sciamma's film is a feminine ode to love and art. Discussion with its magnificent actresses.
It was whispered in Cannes that this film could win the Palme d'Or or the prize for directing. It would be awarded the prize for best screenplay! However, itâs all about direction and performance in this work that tells the story of the encounter between an impoverished young aristocrat (who is set to marry an Italian nobleman) and a painter of the same age who has to paint her portrait. The former refuses to marry as well as to be painted, the latter must fulfill her mission as best she can. Both of them will send the conventions of love and art flying. And all this in 1770! Just before the end of the Enlightenment. This film about women is a wonderful example of what the âfemale gazeâ is in cinema today.
Even more than a love story between two young women in period costume, what other treasure does "Portrait de la jeune fille en feu" hold? Â
AdĂšle Haenel: The belief in love and equality in relationships, in what it brings to our lives.
Noémie Merlant: The love story they experience, it broadens them. Beyond a love story, this film depicts a story of female collaborators. And shows how they dare to live for a moment.
NoĂ©mie, you play a young painter, whoâs very free. Isn't she, in a way, the double of the director CĂ©line Sciamma? Â
N. M.: CĂ©line's gaze on me influenced my interpretation, yes. And the relationship is clear between the director and her actress and the painter - whom I play - and her model - whom AdĂšle plays - thereâs a horizontal gaze between the different individuals. In this way, each one can express herself. In the end, my character is not completely free but curious and determined. Thanks to HĂ©loĂŻse, AdĂšleâs character, I find my freedom and my painting.
The film effectively depicts the condition of women in 1770. What might we envy them? Â
A. H.: The feeling of being secluded. The fact of freeing themselves from the world order that doesnât allow this kind of love between women. But itâs not related to the period. And then, the aspect of interaction and dialogue between multiple social classes which is unprecedented. The fact that they empower themselves to live, which is a novelty for each of them.
At what point do your characters stop scrutinizing each other? Â
A. H.: Heloise scrutinizes Marianne, but less obviously than the other way around because, officially, her position is to be looked at. Sheâs just a "thing" that is looked at, that doesnât have eyes. In silence, inactivity, passivity, there is a much more comprehensive way of considering the person in front of her.
N. M.: I think they never stop looking at each other throughout the film. That's what love is, always discovering new things about one another.
What were the constraints of filming? The costumes?
N. M.: The costumes may seem restrictive but itâs through them that we find our movements. Like the text, itâs very predetermined but in the end, itâs a real tool.
The "female gaze" runs through the film. Whatâs your understanding of this expression?
A. H.: The "female gaze" is consciousness of the "male gaze". Itâs something that has been created in response to a rather "objectivizing" perspective. And that repositions the woman as a subject by giving her back all her complexities as an individual. The "female gaze" emphasizes the major deficiencies in the supposed universality of the male gaze.
N. M.: The "male gaze", the masculine perspective, "objectifies" the woman a little too often.
A. H.: In the "female gaze", thereâs something more egalitarian. I think that respect is a bit of a double-edged sword. Thereâs an aspect of "I respect what I don't understand". Being appreciated is better than respect.
Does this film represent a new level in your career?
A. H.: Iâm in a dynamic of slow ascent. At any rate, of constant progress. This film is particularly important. Itâs the result of an artistic ambition.
N. M.: Itâs given me new motivation. And a new way of understanding the profession. This film helped me to have a clearer view of cinema.
A. H.: Thereâs something ultra-political about this film. As an actress, you learn to defer to a director and to give up trusting yourself to trusting someone else. And in fact, this film reestablishes our intuition. It places that in esteem once again.
N. M.: This film encouraged me to trust myself more.
A. H.: Then, of course, it changes our relationship with the director. We don't let anyone push us around. We pay attention to what we feel.
[Please donât repost this anywhere, in part or in whole.  Feel free to reblog, or at least cite your source and provide a link back here.  Asking permission would be nice in an ideal world, but Iâm a realist - I know far too well how easy it is to appropriate stuff on Tumblr.  I would be the first to admit that my translations are not perfect - there are some words and phrases that simply do not drop neatly into an  equivalent in English, and I constantly fix typos and make changes or corrections in older posts - but they do take a lot of work and time.  Thanks for understanding. - C.] Â
h/t @thexfridaxâ















