The Fugitive Self: New and Selected Poems of John Wheatcroft
Review by Mary Jane Lupton
The Fugitive Self is not an easy read. The extensive collection, which includes poems dating back to the 1964 volume Death of a Clown and ahead to a section entitled New Poems, represents a lifetime of rigorous contemplation. To begin to grasp the significance of the volume demands that readers review the best-known poems of Shakespeare, Homer, Dante, John Milton, Emily Dickinson, Wallace Stevens, Lucille Clifton, William Butler Yeats, and a host of ancient and modern predecessors.
 Yet even without a knowledge of those sources, the reader will experience joy in reading poems that stand completely by themselves, poems as diverse as âHitting a Pheasant on the Pennsylvania Turnpikeâ or âThe Second Best Hotel in Chamberyâ (the latter was first published in 1990 in the New York Times Book Review).Â
 John Wheatcroft was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1925. He attended Temple University on a Mayorâs scholarship. After a semester at Temple, he joined the Navy, hoping to fight against the Germans. Instead, he was assigned to a battleship to fight the Japanese, becoming involved in the battles of the South China Sea, Iwo Jima, Okinowa, and the Japanese mainland.
As a young sailor, Wheatcroft miraculously escaped death when an unnamed enemy, falling from the sky in a parachute, was blown to bits instead of him. Many of his poems, including the title poem âThe Fugitive Self,â are attempts to resurrect the dead Japanese warrior within his psyche, to stop the bullets that âtore into/his flowering youth, and scattered it all to petals. I then and there became him.â
 In âLove and Warâ Wheatcroft writes of âbloodied hands,â
 blood from our buddies,
innocent blood, blood of the beaten.
 All of Wheatcroftâs senses are overcome by the bloodshed. Seeing the flashes from artillery, hearing the blast from guns, the author of âLove and Warâ wonders if he was perhaps smelling theÂ
 stench of flesh weâd never seen
but knew had roasted in the ovens
weâd turned their cities into?
 The visionary connections between Hiroshima and the Holocaust are unmistakable.
 Other poems not about war nonetheless shock with the violent intensity of their images. In âOystersâ he compares opening the shells of oysters to âslick-fingered abortionistsâ who âscrape their flesh from its mother-of-pearl/swallow them raw.â In âThe Cuttingâ he describes having âmade love/to you with a scapel.â These frightening sexual images reverberate against Wheatcroftâs more gentle academic tributes to French novelist Marcel Proust or to American composer John Davison or to French autobiographer Jean Jacques Rousseau. His conflicting visions suggest a peace-loving poet torn, even traumatized, by his horrific witnessing of war and death.
After World War II, Wheatcroft returned to Temple under the G. I. Bill, transferring to Bucknell University in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania in his senior year. He completed his Bachelorâs degree and taught at Bucknell; he later earned his Masterâs and his Doctorate from Rutgers and then taught two years at the University of Kansas before going back to the English Department at Bucknell University, where he taught World Literature from 1952 until 1996.
 Themes of war, struggle, literature, devastation, relationships, culture, and religion form the core of The Fugitive Self. As he had identified with the dead Asian airman, as prince Hamlet had identified with his slain father/king, so Wheatcroft had identified with his own father, a Baptist clergyman. Wheatcroft wrote me that although he and his father had âdifferent views of the Christian religion,â the differences never interfered with the âbeautiful relationshipâ between them.
 In one moving eulogy, âA Prayer for my Anguished Father,â the young Wheatcroft cries: âLet my Father go Lord, Whose dying son has nailed my father on/the shadow cross of selfâŚ.â In another hymn, âNulius Filius,â which roughly translates as bastard son, he compares his father to a dying fish and Death to an angler:
 No angler ever played a fish more surely
than Death has done my fatherâonly to
each time and fling him back in life before
 The hooked lip recalls the scapel and nails and scrapings of other poems. The stanza describing his fatherâs prolonged pain is unending, exhausting, its music soured by the âbony fingersâ of Death plucking on his fatherâs nerves.
 The most formidable poetry in the collection is religious in nature. In âNativity Quintet,â a section from New Poems, Wheatcroft dramatizes many of the Biblical figures surrounding the birth of Jesus: the merchant who gives the infant his swaddling clothes; the thief who will one day hang on the cross next to Christ; the Virgin Mary; Saint Joseph; even the merchantâs donkey, who addresses the Lady, promising to carry her and the baby to safety.
 As he retells the familiar story, Wheatcroft echoes Lucille Clifton, T. S. Eliot, the 23rd Psalm, Yeats, Milton, and others. The various figures of the sequence intersect, held together by Saint Josephâs humble confession to the merchant: âI fear I can pay you nothing, sirâ and by the musicality of the âQuinet.â
The extraordinary rhythms of âNativity Quintetâ shift and changeâfrom couplets to ballad form to stanzas of irregular lengthâexemplifying what Tom Gardner, in his introduction to The Fugitive Self, calls the volumeâs âheatbreaking music.â The sequence differs radically from John Miltonâs great ode, âOn the Morning of Christâs Nativity,â with that odeâs fixed stanzaic structure, and more closely resembles the informal lyrics about Christ and the Virgin that one finds in Lucille Cliftonâs some jesus.
 The most eloquent voice in âNativity Quintetâ is the motherâs. Mary feels the childâs âfirst kickâ within her and exclaims:
 Oh! Something inside me breaks open.
A light from a star right above
This shed turns night into noon
Iâm torn apart by love.
 The repetition of internal soundsâlight, right, nightâcreates a staccato rhythm similar to a shattering, while the words âbreaks openâ and âtorn apartâ image forth the act of a woman in labor. In a single line, Wheatcroft has brilliantly reproduced Maryâs agony but also her joy: âIâm torn apart by love.â
This subtly sexual stanza from the new poems reminds me of a much earlier poem, âThe Rollercoaster,â which I heard John Wheatcroft read when I was at Bucknell more than fifty years ago:
 How dazzling like the rollercoasterâs
Are the climbs we make together,
While lunging and clutching
For the star bubbling silver
 And on and on, in breathless swells, with the âbump at bottomâ followed by the âski-ride over the little undulating humps.â
âThe Rollercoasterâ exudes both energy and climax. Little did I realize, being so terribly naive, that Wheatcroft was describing orgasm. To me, a rollercoaster was a rollercoaster. Nor did I realize, in 1958, that I would one day be privileged enough to review the collected works of a poet whose verse has undulated even more wildly with the passage of time.Â
Mary Jane Lupton, author of Lucille Clifton: Her Life and Letters (Praeger, 2006), has published two earlier reviews in Poets Quarterly. John Wheatcroftâs most recent book is a novel, The Portrait of a Lover (Inverted-A Press, 2011). All biographical information is from their correspondence.