New York once became the symbol of the world's fight against jihadism.
This week, it sent a very different message.
A city that buried nearly 3,000 victims of Islamist terrorism is increasingly rewarding politicians who excuse or minimize Islamist movements, normalize antisemitism, or frame Hamas as "resistance."
For twenty-five years, many people have insisted that Osama bin Laden was poor brown person simply "resisting oppression", "fighting colonialism" and promoting "social justice".
Bin Laden was born into one of the wealthiest families in Saudi Arabia. His father built the Saudi Binladin Group into one of the Middle East's largest construction empires, with close ties to the Saudi royal family. He grew up surrounded by privilege, education, and opportunity.
He did not become a terrorist because he was poor.
He became a terrorist because he embraced an ideology. The Muslim Brothers ideology.
That ideology has a history.
After Egypt cracked down on the Muslim Brotherhood, many of its leading figures found refuge in Saudi Arabia. Among them was Muhammad Qutb, brother of Sayyid Qutb - the Muslim Brotherhood's most influential modern ideologue. Muhammad Qutb became one of Bin Laden's teachers, while Sayyid Qutb's writings profoundly shaped his worldview.
The Brotherhood also gave birth to Hamas through its Palestinian branch.
The same brotherhood that it's 100 years plan to take over the USA was revealed in the holy land trial, by positioning their supporters in key positions in education, media and government, as well as their connections to CAIR, one of Mamdani's big sources of finance.
Bin Laden himself explained why he attacked America, and it had little to do with the popular mythology that emerged afterward.
He condemned democracy as a man-made system replacing God's law.
He rejected religious pluralism.
He wanted governments across the Muslim world replaced with sharia.
He denounced modern Muslim rulers as apostates.
He objected to American troops stationed in Saudi Arabia after Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.
Israel appeared in his rhetoric - but it was only one element of a much broader ideological war against liberal democracy itself.
Yet after September 11, something remarkable happened.
Instead of confronting the ideology that produced nineteen hijackers, much of the conversation shifted toward blaming America - or blaming the Jews.
Conspiracy theories flourished despite decades of investigations finding no evidence that Israel was anyway involved in the attacks, warned Jewish employees to stay home, or benefited from the murders. Those myths survived because antisemitism has always offered a convenient answer when societies refuse to confront the real source of violence.
Even more disturbing, parts of the Arab world openly celebrated. Television cameras captured celebrations in several locations, including Palestinians distributing sweets and cheering in the streets after thousands of civilians had been murdered.
Two decades later, Bin Laden won another victory.
His 2002 "Letter to America" exploded across TikTok, then owned by China's ByteDance. Millions of young Westerners encountered it not as terrorist propaganda, but as a revelation. Videos praising the letter accumulated millions of views before many were removed, with users claiming Bin Laden had "made good points".
The man who murdered nearly 3,000 Americans was suddenly being rediscovered as an anti-imperialist philosopher.
That should alarm everyone.
Authoritarian regimes and Islamist movements do not need to defeat the West militarily if they can convince Western societies to lose confidence in themselves. Russia and China have repeatedly been linked to influence operations aimed at deepening polarization. Qatar has spent decades supporting Muslim Brotherhood-linked movements while providing sanctuary to Hamas leaders and investing heavily in Western institutions.
Today, New York - the city that suffered one of the worst jihadist attack in modern history - is increasingly embracing narratives that excuse or sanitize the ideology that inspired it.
History has a cruel sense of irony.
The people who murdered New Yorkers believed Jews, Christians, secular governments, and liberal democracy were all enemies to be defeated.
Twenty-five years later, many New Yorkers have accepted that worldview.
If the extremists they excuse ultimately turn against them - as history repeatedly suggests they do - they will likely search for someone else to blame.
And if history is any guide, the oldest scapegoats in the world - the very people they elected jihadist apologists to fight, boycott, and divest from - will be blamed for the destruction caused by those same jihadists. By then, of course, New York may already be too far gone.