AIoT, Industrial AI and Physical AI – What’s the difference?
AI Is Getting Real. AI isn’t just contained within your screen, AI is now increasingly tethered to actual machines, equipment, devices, factories, offices, warehouses and more.
As it connects to our world more and more, various labels come into play – AIoT, Industrial AI and Physical AI.
They overlap, but they’re different. AIoT = AI + IoT The combination of connectivity and artificial intelligence. Think RFID, BLE, UWB all the way to the myriad forms of IoT data (sensors, GPS, equipment telemetry, etc.). Information is being collected in real time from the real world by an assortment of devices which the AI then analyzes.
Take a construction site: if you were monitoring everything from equipment utilization, personnel, materials movement, access control, and more – that would be AIoT.
Take a pharma plant: same concept, just tied to all sorts of connected operational factors such as equipment use, inventory levels, environmental conditions, product trace/serialization – all feeding into AI to be interpreted. With connectivity and the physical world (IoT), coupled with intelligence (AI), you get AIoT. Industrial AI = AI for industrial problems With Industrial AI, the use case becomes even more broad.
Not only are IoT-generated data inputs used, but you are incorporating other systems as well, such as ERPs, maintenance history, product quality data, image, work schedules, pure “data”, and much more. Examples of Industrial AI use cases: - Predictive Maintenance - Quality Control - Anomaly Detection - Optimized Production, Efficiency, and Throughput - Outcome or Event Prediction of industrial activities - Schedule/Risk analysis of planning Ultimately, Industrial AI seeks to provide business value through intelligence driving business process. Physical AI = AI That Interacts With The Real World When you’re talking about Physical AI, the system is no longer simply analyzing information – it is also typically acting physically.
Think robotic systems, Autonomous vehicles, intelligent machinery, Industrial Robots, and other systems that operate by and in response to their physical environment.
Physical AI focuses on enabling AI systems to have a physical impact. Consider the two scenarios in construction and pharma: AIoT: What is going on, where is my stuff and am I utilizing assets properly? Industrial AI: Based on the patterns I’m seeing, is there an issue about to occur and is a piece of equipment nearing the point of needing maintenance? Physical AI: Do I have a physical context, and based on that, should I react autonomously within prescribed boundaries?
In the pharma example: AIoT would provide relevant information in the form of dashboards, alerts, and reporting; Industrial AI could use that data and much more (process parameters, quality reports) to analyze equipment and process performance; and finally, Physicalai.com would leverage that analysis and real-time feedback to, for instance, optimize robotic movements in assembly or actively control physical process parameters.
CommConai.com in construction tech and PharmaFlux AI in pharma tech are both excellent examples of companies pioneering these areas. We believe that the progress of technology will involve Observe – Connect – Understand – Predict – Decide – Act, with value along this chain and also peril in this new paradigm as more physical interactions lead to questions of data quality, safety, cybersecurity and accountability. Where would you draw the line between the three concepts below?
Let us know your thoughts in the comments. #AI #AIoT #PhysicalAI