#god programming

Here’s a link to a list of some parts/alters and their roles in a system.

How would the Masonic checkerboard specifically be used in programming?

Black and white patterns such as stripes and checkerboards represent duality and balance. The checkerboard is used for duality programming.

Duality Programming- The splitting of dark and light alters, good versus evil etc. This is the reason black and white stripes and chess boards are often used to represent the dual nature of humanity.  (Spiritual programming)

Similarly, have you heard of the concept of apotheosis being used in programming? Or the Grand Architect of the Universe?

The belief of apotheosis (elevation to the status of a god) can be found in several belief systems. 

Great Architect of the Universe, Grand Architect of the Universe (GAOTU), Sublime Architect of the Universe,Supreme Architect of the Universe.  As a designation it is used within Freemasonry to represent the deity neutrally (in whatever form, and by whatever name each member may individually believe in). Many non-Christian groups acknowledge a Creator—Jews, Muslims, Deists, and many Native American tribes—but the gods those groups worship are different from the God of the Bible. Freemasonry speaks of the Great Architect of the Universe, but it does not affirm who God is, according to the Bible. Freemasons use the term Great Architect of the Universe because it is ambiguous.

Yes, these can be used for programming purposes. 

Do you have any resources on eyes or “all-seeing” eyes being used in programming?

The Eye, representing the all-seeing eye of God, serves as a reminder that humanity's thoughts and deeds are always observed by God—who is referred to in Masonry as the Great Architect of the Universe. Typically, the Masonic Eye of Providence has a semicircular glory below it, and is sometimes enclosed by a triangle.

In programming the Eye can be used as a symbol internally to remind parts that they are being watched at all times. (Not true but parts are told this”

In doll programming, there are specific programs for specific kinds of dolls — do you have any resources on specifically ball-jointed dolls or wind-up toys? Within that, are those programs inherently sexual?

There are various types of doll programming. This is due to the number of types of dolls that are made .oll programming is used first to control the survivor. It is also used to affect the person’s self image.  Doll programming can also be used so the person can assume the ‘role’ of the doll.

Doll programming -The subject is given a doll that  is made to look like them. The subject is taught to project their feelings onto the doll. Due to the doll looking like the subject they are projecting onto themselves. The programmer will place the doll in positions and have the subject ‘abuse’ the doll. The subject is trained to assume the same positions so they can be abused.

No, not all doll programming is sexual programming. 

The main feature of the ball-jointed doll is its joints. These joints are round and can be taken apart. So you can assemble the joints and body parts to make a doll. BJDs are designed with head caps that allow someone to open the back of their head and change out their eyes. They also are designed to wear a removable wig, so their looks can be changed at any time. Many BJDs come with blank faces, so a unique face can be applied by the programmer.

BJDs are commonly hand crafted in Asian countries. BJD are anatomically correct.

BJD can have many purposes in programming. 

Clockwork toys tend to be programmed for one purpose for the amount of time they are wound. Their programmed task would depend on the type of toy they are.

Can a programmed individual go on to program family members without being consciously aware of it? We believe that’s what our case looked like, except the attempted programming was extremely messy and incomplete where we believe that they didn’t actually know what they were doing and were merely attempting to mirror or recreate the events perpetrated against them.

Programmed individuals support the programming of family members. They typically aren’t the one who implements the programming. This is due to the dual roles this would intel and the confusion it could lead to within the system. An example would be, a programmed adult or sibling would use the form of abuse used to create the part in the other family member.

Someone who is programmed, unless specifically trained to program others, would not know how to program another person. It would likely lead to the result you described.

We're doing alright.

Take care,