Glissant on opacity
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Malaysia
seen from Slovenia
seen from Canada
seen from Finland

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
Glissant on opacity

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"[Jacques] Roubaud suggests that there were many trobairitz [women troubadours] in Occitanie, and that the Church destroyed their work during the Catholic Inquisition that was carried out in the region from 1229 until 1329. For Glissant this Inquisition, and the 1209–29 crusade against the Cathars, constitute the beginning of the political construction of the defensive concept of a bordered, exclusive, rationalist and racialised Europe, and also the start of European colonial destruction of local cultures, languages and peoples. Ostensibly aiming at the military destruction of the Cathar heresy, a radical mystic sect antithetical to the Catholic Church, the Albigensian crusade served more broadly to root out heretical thought and practices from a Europe just then beginning to construct a universalist regime that organised itself around King and Church. Glissant stresses that the heretical, mystical strains of thought that had flourished within a heterodox Europe were, in the medieval period, separated out from the official thought systems precisely in order to be expunged from Europe’s self-representation. ‘All the dramas of mystic or heretical thought in the Middle Ages are truly dramas, meaning that they end badly. This means that this is a thought that was either devastated, as they did to the Cathars, or castrated, as they did to Abelard, who they reproached less for his amorous relationship than his spiritual exchange with Héloïse, as they did to all the women tied to the stake, up to and including Joan of Arc, and as they did to all who found pleasure in obscure thought...’ Glissant says. As for the troubadours, Roubaud concludes that the crusade was responsible for the end of the two-century flourishing of a culture of song. ‘Song was born, and was killed’, he states. So the culture of troubadour song, heretically marginal to authority, was part of Europe ’s self-inflicted loss." —Lisa Robertson, Anemones: A Simone Weil Project
Love this Robertson book but am still confused about how the Cathar disdain for the material world (à la the gnostics) can be squared with the troubadour philosophy of love... I can definitely see the influence of Arabic poetry and Andalusian mysticism on the troubadour tradition, though.
What a bias it is--inherited from the practice of the oppressors--to suppose that a work of art cannot arise from the house of the master just as easily as from the shack of the oppressed. That would be as judgmental as its opposite: 'Those savages can produce nothing civilized.' It echoes the same old questions shouted at writers and artists like us from countries of the South: 'Whom do you write for? Do you write for the working class? For the bourgeois? For your race? For Whites?' These questions evade the heart of the matter: the Relation of literature to its highest object, the world-totality.
Eduard Glissant, Faulkner, Mississippi, 16
In opposition to cultural models of fixity and continuity, the changing dimensions of land and sea in Glissant’s work provide a means through which to consider the relationship between narratives of production and destruction within Caribbean writing. As Sonya Postmentier (2017) has recently argued, the experience of “cultivation” and “catastrophe” is key to the Caribbean imaginary, where the forces of tide and hurricane and their attendant “catastrophe yield [...] to the cultivation [...] of art” (182). Glissant argues that environmental catastrophe is central to the Caribbean experience, which is not characterized by “the economy of the meadow [or the] serenity of the spring” but rather by “the irruption into modernity” (1989, 146).
This sense of irruption brings with it an attendant sense of chaos and fragmentation that is incompatible with western discourses of history and linear progress. This relationship between chaos, cultivation and collection is particularly important in the work of the Barbadian poet Kamau Brathwaite, whose frequent invocation of the hurricane and fascination with fragmentation provides an opportunity to consider “the interconnectedness of environmental and cultural experience” as enacted at the shoreline [...]. Positioned as the site of arrival and departure, wreckage and relation, the shoreline is presented as “the ultimate frontier”, a space that bares “visible evidence of our past wanderings and our present distress” (Glissant 1989, 11). Invoking lines from Walcott’s “The Sea is History” [...], Glissant attests that “landscape is its own monument” whose “meaning can only be traced on the underside. It is all history” (1989, 11). As the site of various material surfacings, the shoreline becomes the site upon which these subterranean and submarine histories can become visible, and, through poetry, newly legible. ‘
Yet for Glissant it is not only the terrestrial beaches that emerge as sites of cross-cultural contact and historical exchange, but the ocean itself. Bringing “to light like seaweed, these lowest depths, these deeps” (Glissant 1997, 6) that harbour the submerged voices of the Middle Passage, his poetics exhibits a concern with both “material residue of the past as well as the lost lives [...]”. For Glissant, the Ocean is not an empty void, but is instead viewed as the site of Atlantic modernity whose “vast beginning [...] is marked by [...] balls and chains [...].” The striking image of the “scarcely corroded balls and chains” that punctuate the sea floor of the Atlantic stands both as monument to the victims of the transatlantic slave trade and a testament to the sea’s transformative temporalities (6). Within Glissant’s writings the ocean is not an end point, but an origin.
It is the site of strange movements and meetings between the past, the present and possible futures.
---
As DeLoughrey suggests, Caribbean writing is frequently drawn to the plurality and “the infinity of the oceanic imaginary [which] provides an alternative model of space and time, a ‘tidalectic’ between past and present, land and sea, the local and the global” (2012, 803).
The concept of the “tidalectic” was first coined by Brathwaite, whose poetic attention to Caribbean histories and geographies explicitly draws upon the complex relationship between maritime space and cultural production. Engaging the elemental forces of tide and hurricane, Brathwaite’s “tidalectic” places emphasis on the open-ended and cyclical action of the ocean in which land and sea, arrival and departure, local and global are brought into a state of continuous contact and exchange.
---
Rather than adopting the image of the single wave (often attached to “waves” of colonization), Brathwaite’s tidalectic draws from the dynamism of “the ripple and the two tide movement” [...]. The inclusion of “ripple” and “two tide” is significant here as it ensures that the tidalectic is not symply a dichotomous process of infinitely repeated motions of arrival and departure enacted between two static points but is instead characterized by an ongoing “tangled urgent meaning to & fro. like foam. saltless as from the bottom of the sea. dragging our meaning our moaninig / song from Calabar along the sea-floor with pebble sound & conch & wound & sea-sound moon” (Brathwaite quoted in Naylor 1999 [...]). Brathwaite draws a sense of continuous relation between the sunken history of the Middle Passage, the sea-sounds of the islandscape and the voices of the island community. The constant tug and pull of the tide unearths the sounds of “pebble”, “conch & wound”, reclaiming a cacaphony of drowned voices that fell to the “bottom of the sea” during the passage from Calabar in Nigeria to “a simple unsuspecting shop in Mile&Q, Barbados” (162). In a similar mode to Glissant’s beachcombing, Brathwaite’s tidalectic enacts a poetics of salvage and restoration that works to recover and recirculate the submerged voices and histories of the Atlantic. [...] Yet while these images are fragmentary in nature, [...] [a]cross the poem, Brathwaite mediates a sense of ruin, fragmentation and decay with the possibility of restoration. In gathering together the various strands, shards and splinters of history and culture that have washed ashore, the poem seeks to address past narratives of “struggle” and conquest that have shaped the Caribbean, and in doing so gives rise to the possibility of “restoration” and recovery (11). The poem’s repetition of “out of the” establishes a new order out of the wreckage of the beachscape, where “out of the ruins”, “out of the cracks”, “out of the silence” new voices and images might begin to grow (12).
---
All text above by: Alexandra Campbell. “Atlantic exchanges: The poetics of dispersal and disposal in Scottish and Caribbean seas.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing Volume 55 (2019), Issue 2: Special Focus: Eco-Fictions: Emergent Discourses and Nature and the Environment in Postcolonial Literature, pages 195-208. Published online 2 May 2019. At DOI: doi dot org slash 10.1080/17449855.2019.1590622. [Bold emphasis and some paragraph breaks/contractions added by me for accessibility. Presented here for commentary, teaching, criticism purposes.]

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
tout-monde et tout
#inktober #jour11 #repugnant #jour12 #glissant https://www.instagram.com/p/CGQCeqIKs1h/?igshid=1vczwk7jd0hxa
The owl of Minerva
spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk.
A phrase written by Hegel as a metaphor for the fact that true knowledge only comes with hindsight. Only after something has happened can we truly gain proper knowledge. Ive spent the last week and a half writing the take home exam – I wrote about the theories of the French/Martinican author, poet, playwright and philosopher Édouard Glissant, specifically on his theories of a new way for cultures to interact – a way that would allow for mutual beneficiary relations by mutual interaction and respect. It will be very interesting too see what result I will get, as I went quite a bit off the books with this one. I basically let loose and followed wherever my mind (and the books) took me.
I made connections too some of the usual post-colonial and feminist theorists, but most fun of all – to my favorite Canadian thinker: Marshall McLuhan. One of these days I might translate what I wrote and put it on this blog, but I think the interest would be moderate at best.
We are now moving on with logic. This week we’ve covered the basics – we started with Aristotle, then threw in a tad of Leibniz, a smidge of von Wright and a large serving of Kant. On Monday we start with Hegel. That will be fun!