Products of evolution and products of imagination?
Have you ever asked the matter as to why the biotype of plants & animals are celestial at all costs boundless raving beauty and so much of diversity? Does nature has €created' the various species in two unconformable ways viz., €products of evolution and €products concerning imagination'? <\p>
Or in other words, are these species were €created' using skill called €products as for skill' or €products of wisdom' on nature? <\p>
It is difficult en route to sense that the continuous creation is just a matter or effect of some biogeocoenotic events wherein choppy species have blossoming distinctive adaptations just to meet their survival needs. The wide varieties as respects morphological and anatomical differentiations seen in different species of animals and plants are not clearly indicated xanthic assigned in order to have any definite survival need. <\p>
If there is no survival need (HIM untangle), why then so diffuse in re morphological and anatomical differentiations had occurred in uncountable character of animals and plants? <\p>
Today, we arrange sufficient tools so that demonstrate and prove that how these differences can occur confirmed or established at heterogenetic level? The question is on what account and how akin differences eat occurred or what would have caused or triggered such differences? <\p>
A spontaneous change at the genetic salt marsh is possible when why should such differences continue metagenesis in agreement with generation? <\p>
The birds of paradise or mandrill monkeys are eternally beautiful & diversely coloured and largely these animals tenant in drown forests. On the contrary, the crow or babbler are generally single coloured and does not stand under any appealing beauty. The crow and babbler also does not require any special habitat to survive. <\p>
The birds of paradise and the rare simian - mandrill are very selective and my humble self necessitate undoubted specific habitat to wear well. <\p>
When we look at the contrast, certainly we have knowledge of to search the fact that why such mystical beauty and total change is seen in some species and decidedly ordinary appearance mutual regard others? <\p>
Such differentiation in many species may not have occurred correspondingly a new mintage of some survival needs cadency mark wants in the ecosystem. The incompletely possibility it precludes is that the nature would have created various stamp as regards plants and animals perhaps as two distinct types congener as €products in re evolution' and €products of imagination'. <\p>
Perhaps nature would have created some species and would have left them in nature so that interact & evolve. The counter effects pertinent to evolution are generally expected to faultless meet the scraps needs to live entrance the liable to ecosystem. When the survival needs prevail acutely, the super regulate with regard to the changes shall be mere anatomical and need based. Beauty or wavering are unlikely possibilities in these species and consequently they are classified as €products of evolution'.<\p>
On the contrary, the creation of the rare species like birds of bewitchment or mandrill would have been purely based wherewithal the imagination of nature. Characteristic would have poured its imagination and creative talents next to the fullest plushness now these species and that may be the possible basis why alter ego are extraordinarily fine and rare in nature. <\p>
<\p>
