#futureoflaw

Gideon Korrell Talks About the Future of Law in a Digital World

https://www.thelawyersglobal.org/articles/ai-with-heart-examining-the-emotional-facets-of-artificial-intelligence

⚖️ California Moves to Regulate Lawyers’ Use of AI

The California Senate has passed SB 574, a bill that would require lawyers to verify the accuracy of any material generated using artificial intelligence before submitting it in court filings — including case citations and factual statements.

This proposed law responds to growing concerns over AI “hallucinations,” which have already led to sanctions in multiple cases across the U.S. Under SB 574, attorneys would be required to take reasonable steps to confirm accuracy, correct false or biased outputs, and ensure that AI-generated material is not relied upon without proper human review.

The bill also introduces clear limits on arbitration proceedings. Arbitrators would be prohibited from delegating decision-making to generative AI or relying on AI-produced information outside the official case record without first disclosing it to the parties involved.

Importantly, the legislation would bar lawyers from entering confidential or non-public information into public generative AI tools and requires that AI use must not unlawfully discriminate against individuals or communities.

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into legal practice, California is drawing a firm boundary: AI may assist — but accountability remains human.

The bill now moves to the California State Assembly for further consideration.

Can Artificial Intelligence coexist with constitutional values? 🤖⚖️

As AI reshapes governance, privacy, and decision-making, the Constitution faces new legal and ethical challenges. Understanding this clash is key to protecting fundamental rights in the digital age.

Learn more: https://praesidiumip.com/blog/ai-vs-constitution

Gideon Korrell Shares His View on the Future of Sustainable Technology Law

✨⚖️ AI in Law Schools: The New Reality ⚖️✨

Last month, 375 new Fordham Law students walked into orientation and got a wild assignment: 📄 Compare two case summaries of Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Kendrick Lamar’s record label.

One was written by a professor.

The other? Generated by ChatGPT.

Their job: spot the AI, pick apart its accuracy, and debate its nuance. Spoiler: the AI version included some irrelevant facts 👀.

But here’s the thing… Fordham isn’t alone. At least eight U.S. law schools (including Arizona State, Case Western, Suffolk, and Quinnipiac) are now making AI training part of the first-year experience.

✔️ Deans are calling AI a must-have skill for tomorrow’s attorneys. ✔️ Employers want graduates who can use AI responsibly. ✔️ Students are being trained to spot errors, avoid “hallucinations,” and think critically about what AI produces.

ASU dean Stacy Leeds said it best:

“You can’t be a competent attorney — especially not three years from now — if you don’t have a base understanding of AI and the ability to adapt quickly.”

From fear of cheating ➝ to skill-building, law schools are officially turning a corner. The lawyer of the future? Not just research-ready, but AI-ready. ⚖️🤖