What do you think it's like to live in the middle class cars?
Well, most followers of this blog have a regular or semi-regular internet access, which means, in general, that they have clothes on their backs, some food and most often a roof over their heads even if the situations can be more or less precarious and they can know various kinds of struggles, so Iād say the majority of us already know what itās like to live in the middle class cars.
Now the big difference between the Train and our capitalist models of societies is that we are encouraged, or at least those on top make us dream of, changing our social status. See, the so-called āAmerican dreamā for example, its the promise that with enough work anyone can make it to the top, everyone has the same chances (haha!). Itās in the collective mind that if you work hard enough you can climb the ladder and become richer, have a better situation (āWhaddaya mean racial inequalities in the USA, Jay-Z and Barack Obama are rich, arenāt they?ā). Sure, it can happen. But in capitalism, for it to happen, you donāt actually climb a ladder, you just stomp on people underneath you. A few people can get richer, but at the expense of poorer people, there canāt be people getting rich if there are no poor people to exploit, you canāt save money on the t-shirt you buy if itās not made by extremely poor people in third world countries, you canāt expect such a cheap cheeseburger in your McDonaldās if the employees are paid an actual decent wage.
Anyway, all this to say, the middle class in most societies around the world is told that they can get a better status (and if they donāt, well, itās their fault). But in the Train, where the motto is āknow your place, keep your placeā, I wonder if the system is exactly the same. Are the guards, the gardeners, the middle class workers given opportunities to move to the front. Can they get promotions? Are they allowed to dream to be in the front and enjoy its luxury (just as Edgar and Curtis did in the beginning, saying how they would act when they would be there, just as we all say sometimes āWhen Iām rich Iām gonna do this, or do thatā) or are they trained to stay in their lane because thatās the way it is and that trying to change things would be chaos, as Mason puts it? The tail section is taught that everyone should remain in their preordained position, this is something Mason and Wilford both repeat, so we could think that everyone stays in their place and there are no possibilities to āmove to the frontā, unlike in our society.
However, there are a few examples of tail-sectioners having gained a better social status: Paul the guy who makes the food, and Gerald the violinist (and itās interesting to notice that both ended up fully collaborating with the Front, probably because they didnāt have a choice). So maybe in the Middle thereās also a system of rewards, maybe they let the workers think that if theyāre good enough they can get a better situation?
All middle class workers are obedient, even more than the tail sectioners, for a simple reason: itās not just that they are brainwashed, itād be too easy to think that way, but because they have something to lose. Of course guarding prisons or growing tomatoes, or repeatedly making sushi for spoiled brats is not exciting but itās better than having nothing. The middle class, just as it is in real life, remains silent most of the time because they have jobs/house/material privileges to keep. At least, theyāre not the scum of the train, theyāre not ātail-section pricksā to quote Minsu, they have a purpose, jobs and defined roles, a little bit of comfort. If they rebelled, they would be dead and thus lose everything. So I think in the middle sections they prefer to stay where they are and enjoy what they have (a level of comfort thatās nowhere near what you can find in the Front but still better than the Tail) instead of trying too hard to push towards the Front and risk losing everything. Do what theyāre told, ask no questions, just accept the situation and admit it could be worse.











