Feb 24, 2025
As an exercise to the reader, try and figure out quite how much is wrong with this AI overview...
Loading...
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Dominican Republic
seen from China
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
As an exercise to the reader, try and figure out quite how much is wrong with this AI overview...
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
FRACTAL WRONGNESS
That’s.... that’s not how anything works.
Above left: the president-elect of the United States of America. Above right: Scott Lemieux, right now, artist’s rendering. Amazingly, an anti-democratic mechanism intended to overrepresent the interests of slaveholders has not prevented a white nationalist authoritarian who lost the election by the standard that prevails in pretty much every democratic jurisdiction in the world from …
Scott, and LGAM, stop talking. Please stop talking. With every post, you prove yourselves to be GIANT FUCKING ANTI-FREEDOM, ANTI-RIGHTS RETARDS.
Here’s what it sounds like to me when people go off about “There’s only two genders and it’s determined at birth, that’s not my opinion, it’s science! You can’t fight science!”:
-
There’s only two names and they’re determined at birth. The proof for this is simple: there’s only two eye colors, blue and brown. Therefore, there’s only two names. Having a third name, when there isn’t a third eye color, is clearly just science-denial and attention-seeking.
Those two names, of course, are Ricky and Natasha. That’s just plain science! You’re either named Ricky, or you’re named Natasha. That’s all there is. I have brown eyes, so I’m Ricky, as nature intended.
Anyway, you can hardly expect me to remember a third name, or to accept that someone has a name I wouldn’t know just by looking at them. (I need not mention that sunglasses and colored contacts are morally wrong, because Science.)
So which are you really, Ricky or Natasha?
-
The premise is wrong, but even if it wasn’t, the conclusion would still be from a different planet than the premise.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The third and final instalment of my critique of Locke’s theory of appropriation/expropriation is up at Jacobin. I turn my attention from Locke to Jefferson, Locke’s most important foll…
Neither Locke nor epigones such as Nozick and Rothbard can provide a coherent theory of just appropriation of property.
Yes they can. You, John "Jackasshole" Quiggin cannot provide a coherent argument against them. Jackoff.
I accept no responsibility for the damage to your teeth, hair and general well-being that comes of seeing this post.
Me, right now:
I don’t even know where to start
All of this is bullshit, every last bit I don’t even.
I've been trying to publish this post for 5 months. It's been sitting in my queue, and I've been too worried about fallout to publish it, despite the support of friends familiar with the situation....
"Developer".