Supreme Court ruling guts governmentās use of geofence warrants
SCOTUS falls short of deeming geofence warrants unconstitutional, though.
Supreme Court ruling guts governmentās use of geofence warrants
Archive Links: ia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from China
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Russia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from Malaysia
seen from T1

seen from Costa Rica
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from T1
Supreme Court ruling guts governmentās use of geofence warrants
SCOTUS falls short of deeming geofence warrants unconstitutional, though.
Supreme Court ruling guts governmentās use of geofence warrants
Archive Links: ia

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Kiki and the Constitutional Quagmire of ICEās Arrest Powers
TL;DR: ICEās administrative arrest powers sidestep judicial oversight, raising serious Fourth Amendment concerns.
Kikiās story is a stark reminder of the constitutional challenges posed by ICEās administrative arrest powers.
In recent weeks, Kikiās case has drawn attention to the way Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operates, particularly its ability to conduct arrests without a judicial warrant. This practice raises significant constitutional questions, especially concerning the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment is a cornerstone of American civil liberties, ensuring that the government cannot intrude into our lives without due process.
Hereās the crux of the issue:
Administrative Warrants: ICE often uses administrative warrants, which are not reviewed by a judge, to detain individuals. This bypasses the normal judicial warrant process, which requires probable cause and judicial oversight.
Fourth Amendment Concerns: The use of administrative warrants raises questions about the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Without judicial oversight, thereās a risk of abuse and overreach.
Impact on Communities: This practice disproportionately affects immigrant communities, creating an atmosphere of fear and mistrust. It undermines the social fabric by making people wary of engaging with authorities, even when they need help.
Kikiās situation isnāt just a personal ordeal; itās a microcosm of a larger constitutional debate. As we reflect on the implications of ICEās powers, we must ask ourselves: How do we balance national security with individual rights? Shouldnāt the protection of civil liberties be paramount in a democratic society? Itās time to engage in a broader conversation about reforming these practices to ensure they align with constitutional principles.
What do you think? Should ICEās powers be reined in to better protect constitutional rights? Letās discuss how we can advocate for change that upholds the values of justice and liberty for all.
episode 5: you wish you'd read the terms of service but you don't
if all terms of service were like this you'd read them for fun
How many time have you actually read the Terms of Service (TOS), or Privacy policies on websites, services and social media that you use? Itās so boring and tedious, right? What if there is a way to make it simple to decode and likely for you to check them out? What if it was interesting enough to make you WANT to check them out.
I had a dream once, a vision, I wanted to do something, so, Iā¦
View On WordPress
episode 4: Libraries are Oases of Sanity
episode 4: Libraries are Oases ofĀ Sanity
Libraries are a glimmer of hope in a situation where a rogue, corrupt element in government has done everything they can to destroy societyās institutions. The Library concept is like a buoy in the chaos of idiocy. Go to a Library.
We have seen some weird shit in the past 30 years in the U.S. In the most recent Presidential campaign, the candidate from the Party that is supposedly the workingā¦
View On WordPress
āFriendsā can share your Facebook profile with the government, court rules
#SuryaRay #Surya A federal judge has ruled that investigators can go through your Facebook profile if one of your friends gives them permission to do so. The decision, which is part of a New York City racketeering trial, comes as courts struggle to define privacy and civil liberties in the age of social media. In an order issued on Friday, US District Judge William Pauley III ruled that accused gangster Melvin Colon canāt rely on the Fourth Amendment to suppress Facebook evidence that led to his indictment. Colon had argued thatĀ federal investigators violated his privacy by tapping into his profile through an informant who was one of this Facebook friends. The informantās Facebook friendship served to open an online window onto Colonās alleged gangster life, revealing messages he posted about violent acts and threats to rival gang members. The government used this information to obtain a search warrant for the rest of Colonās Facebook account. The Colon information is part of a larger investigation into crack-dealing and murder in the Bronx. Judge Pauley IIIās ruling is significant because it is the latest in a series of cases that defines how and when police can search social media. * See also: Social Media judge says tweets are for cops In the Bronx case, the judge found that Colon couldnāt stop his Facebook friends doing what they liked with the information he revealed: Colonās legitimate expectation of privacy ended when he disseminated posts to his āfriendsā because those āfriendsā were free to use the information however they wanted-including sharing it with the Government. To support this position, Judge Pauley III cited a case that confirmed the government can listen in on phone calls without a warrant provided that one of the people on the call gives it permission to do so. Ironically, Colonās current account suggests that the governmentās ability to peruse Facebook profiles may have become even easier since the introduction of the Facebook Timeline. The feature can in some cases reveal past events and status updates to the public unless a user changes his or her privacy settings. What appears to be Colonās account (cited in the court case as āMellymella Ballaā in the Bronx) can now be seen by the public. Here is a screenshot from his profile: The case may also raise the question of whether social media companies are providing an adequate explanation of their privacy settings to all Americans. You can read the ruling itself here: Facebook Privacy Ruling _(Image byĀ Fisun IvanĀ via Shutterstock)_ --- http://dlvr.it/20mnBp @suryaray

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming