Character in general: I actually really like Liquid Snake; heâs one of my preferred characters in the series and definitely my favorite villain. I actually find that I care less for him in MGSV than I do in MGS1. Young Liquid doesnât do something for me that older Liquid did, I suppose, and Iâve never been big on sympathy backgrounds. I feel like I would probably like him more if they hadnât cut Kingdom of the Flies, because there you can really see the beginnings of Liquidâs histrionic personality, how belligerent and controlling he is, where his sense of entitlement comes from, and how his admittedly impressive leadership skills blossomed out of the leash that he held other children on. Liquid has no equals; everybody is above him or below him, and Mission 51 was the starting point. In the incomplete cutscenes, you can see the parallels between the island and Shadow Moses. The fact that they took it out makes it an incomplete arc. Instead, youâre awkwardly left with Eli riding off into the sunset, and then the game just... ends, and all you have of Liquidâs character is a problematic tantrum-throwing child whoâs skilled in combat and has some control over his fellow children, the nature of which isnât fully explored. Perspective is based on where you begin and end a story. By leaving out Kingdom of the Flies, we are left with a very different idea of who Liquid was. Weâre lucky that they put the information in the Blu-Ray disc so that we have an idea of what apparently happened in canon, but itâs not the same. I will, however, say that I really enjoyed the parallels with Eli and Venom vs. Snake and Big Boss, and the fact that we learn that Liquid never actually knew the real Big Boss. You have the main games with the main characters, and then you have V and the other side of the coin. I donât think that Eli ever learned the truth about Venom based on his dialogue in MGS1, but the fact that he calls himself Snakeâs shadow becomes something of a callback ( or call forward because this series has formed a damn ouroboros !!! ) to Venom being Big Bossâs phantom. Thereâs a level of unreality to it, this idea that you should be someone but youâre not, and I would have loved to see Eliâs reaction to finding out that Venom was not in fact Big Boss. That Liquid carries this resentment towards Snake for years is all the more significant for the way that these two now line up: itâs not that âBig Bossâ instilled this sense of not being good enough in him, itâs that the man who was supposed to be Big Boss somehow convinced him that he was lesser than his twin, who also struggles with his identity compared to the actual Big Boss, because this family has formed a trauma conga line that never ends.How they play them: Your writing itself is very good. However, thereâs some hesitance to bring out his nastier qualities without making an excuse or trying to justify them. There is a difference between explaining a characterâs actions and excusing them. Iâve played many an antagonist before and I understand how easy it is to jump to their defense, but if youâre lacking that objective element, itâs also easy to lose a huge portion of the character very rapidly. It can be difficult to accept and represent flaws or outright meanness in a character that is important to you, but if you donât, theyâre not wholly that character. My advice to you ( and of course this is take it or leave it; you choose how you write your character and are in no way obligated to listen to me! ) would be to try not to shrink from admitting that Liquid can be wrong ( not just in ways that frame him sympathetically, such as losing the FOXHOUND unit ), that Liquid can be weak, that Liquid can be vengeful unjustifiably or not, that Liquid can do some seriously fucked up shit outside of the context of his trauma because there came a point where he was an adult with autonomy who made some very bad decisions with full understanding that he was in a moral black area. Condemning your favorite for the things they should be condemned for does not make them a lesser character because a good character is not an amalgamation of well-meant deeds, mistakes, and victimhood, but one who is well-thought-out and realistic. That being said, the threads that we have are extremely fulfilling. You think of some marvelous AUs and, again, your writing is wonderful. I like the way that you craft interactions between multiple characters; your writing is at its best when Eli is reflecting on his feelings for somebody else -- I always enjoy reading it, even if itâs not our thread, because it provides some excellent insight into who he is. Your objective analysis is also a pleasure to read and I think that you really do understand Liquidâs character. You have the whole of his canon mapped out and you apply it in your threads. Once more, my advice is just to let more of the negative traits show through, because I think it will deepen your characterization a lot. You have it because you have written about it and talked about it. You havenât overlooked it at all. Just let it shine a bit more.The Mun: You seem like a good sort, my friend. Youâre very sweet, and I enjoy talking to you, sharing things with you, etc.; I have a good time whenever we chat on Skype. Youâre also very intelligent and I like reading your analysis when it crops up.