#fl370

Surfing the clouds into San Fran this evening #fl370 #pilotlife #iloveflying #lr45 https://www.instagram.com/playinghard702/p/Bupkz1-AQbc/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1sbtr3vk2h1qv

Stunning view of the mighty Alps as seen from a Boeing 787 window 🏔 #flyinrick #htconem9 #alps #snow #mountains #fl370 #oneography #787 #panorama

Anonymous Discusses Jacob Rothschild Flight 370 Conspiracy

I agree with this linked story to an extent. If it exploded at 35K alt, the debris field would be hundreds of miles area and would have explanded since then. Look at TWA FL800 and see what an explosive debris field looks like. No detected explosions from satalites. No jet fuel on water. No evidense whatsoever of a crash. Just a missing jet. Understanding that no debris has been found after four days, to me this linked story seems like a plausible tech explanation on how the communication could be intentionally stopped by a hijacker. I think that the cockpit was probably compromised somehow (pilot bathroom break?) and then the communications systems were shut down from the cockpit (Internet, transponders and ACARS). I know from experience that cell phones are worthless on a jet like this especially at altitude and over sea. I am not much of a conspiracy theorist normally but a crash seems so unlikely now. I think this plane was probably hijacked and flown to a sympathetic country where it landed safely. Motive is such a question though. http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/malaysia-air *Fact: Before it disappeared, radar data indicated the plane may have turned around to head back to Kuala Lumpur. Is that a clue that a hijacker had ordered the plane to change course? *Analysis: So far, there have been no reports that the flight crew sent any signals that a hijacking had occurred.Some experts say that could have been deliberate. *Fact: The plane had stopped sending identifying transponder codes before it disappeared. *Analysis: "Given that this airplane has so many redundant electrical systems on it, my first reaction would be that somebody... purposely turned it off," said John Goglia, a former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board member. "A pilot would not do that. Somebody that didn't want to be seen very well would do that."John Ransom, a retired commercial pilot and safety consultant, said the situation sounds fishy. "This was a fairly modern airplane with a bunch of capability to communicate with the outside world. A lot of data transmissions from the airplane," he said. "For them to all stop at the same time would take the work of somebody who has actually studied the systems in some detail to know how to turn off all of the systems at the same time." Turning off a transponder is a "deliberate process," said Peter Goelz, a former NTSB managing director. "If someone did that in the cockpit," he said, "they were doing it to disguise the route of the plane." Was someone unauthorized inside the cockpit, ordering the transponders to be turned off and the plane to be turned around? Or, he said, "Did one of the pilots do it themselves?"