Thereās been some interesting discussion around First Mates. @celluloidbroomclosetās post here looks at the complexity of Ed and Izzyās dynamic around the trope of the toxic father figure, and it got me thinking a little more about Buttons.
Because Stede has every reason to end up with a similar First Mate as Ed. Edās story is extreme, but we shouldnāt diminish the abuse and trauma Stede went through at the hands of his father. How Buttons became Stedeās First Mate is never clear, but despite marching to a drum no one else can hear, heās a good choice.
Buttons I donāt think has any ambition to be Captain. Not everyone can be āKingā. Some people are āPriestsā, and their strengths lie in the role of advisor and confidante. The great monarchs of England learned to listen to their Archbishops of Canterbury, and Stede seems to realise itās the mark of a good leader to take advice. He manages to stave off a mutiny with Buttonsā support. Buttons isnāt correct in the long term - the crew donāt actually need more toxic masculinity - but he is right in the here and now. The immediate threat of mutiny needs to be dealt with before Stedeās long-game of helping the crew grow takes effect.
Buttons is mostly respectful and objective. He explains to Stede the mood of the crew in clear terms, and offers advice. Later, he knows the rules of a duel and is fundamental in clarifying Stede as āwinningā. Buttons is a good judge of character, has little to do with Jack, and is pretty hostile (correctly) to him from the off, although he doesnāt interfere further until he has to.
In series two, Buttons takes control immediately as the crew retake the Revenge whilst Stede is still on the Red Flag. He doesnāt stand about asking about āthe planā, and knows when he needs to step-up. He supports Stede again once Ed returns, explaining the gravy basket, helping Stede to follow Ed when he seems in a state of emotional inertia. And he operates as an older, positive father-figure to Ed, using his transmogrification as a teachable moment for growth. His disappearance from the narrative is noticeable, allowing Izzy to work his way in to Stedeās vulnerabilities, showing Stede too is ripe for father-trauma exploitation given the opportunity.
Itās been suggested that the idea of Izzy wanting captaincy, and the power he perceives that comes with it, was meant to be more explicit than it is in season one. Itās still obvious though. Izzy signals twice he is happy to stay on the Revenge without Ed so long as he is Captain. If he canāt be, he will serve ultra-masculinity only, via Blackbeard.
I think thereās something in Izzy, a white man presenting as an ultra-masc Captain, getting mutinied against immediately, and being rescued by the mere returning presence of a brown man, beardless and broken, who then commands the crewās respect effortlessly. Part of Izzyās going off the deep end at Ed I feel is bruised ego. If youāre going to be Captain when I cannot, at least be a āproper manā about it whom I can serve. Else what does it say about meā¦
After the Izzy-as-Captain scene, we soon get the mutiny discussion where Olu is chosen to lead. We notice Buttons isnāt an obvious choice, and again, it isnāt his strength, and I donāt think he wants it. But I do like his comment that āThe only good captains are the ones that hate being captainsā. Buttons has been round the block a few times, and has seen his fair share of captains. Those with the right attributes - having everyoneās interests in mind - who have greatness thrust upon them, make the best leaders. Buttons acts again in the capacity as advisor but to all this time, and leads the salute to Olu.
Neither Buttons nor Izzyās fate is to be Captain, but for very different reasons. Buttons is a sort of Wiseman, Obi-Wan, Gandalf figure. Heās absolutely necessary, talented, and vital to success. He is needed as much as the Captain or King in any story. The King offers provision, the Priest offers vision. Itās a mutual co-existence even if the buck stops with only one. We see Ed having to offer both the provision and the vision. It should be Izzy reading those cloudsā¦
The trouble with Izzy is he wants to be King, finds himself in the role of Priest, and doesnāt have the interpersonal skills for either. In fact, heās inherently bad at both yet doesnāt know it. When certain people donāt understand their limitations, thatās when the trouble startsā¦
Nathaniel Buttons, First Mate, Advisor, Priest, Confidante, Lover of the Sea, seabird
All round good egg.