AI art shills that don't understand technology will really just see someone enter in a nonsense prompt, be surprised when it comes out looking like shit, then piss themselves when someone presses the "RANDOMIZE" button a hundred times that it comes out looking more and more like shit. They will genuinely believe some dork telling them with a straight face that the coming machine gods are plugging into some new psychic archetype no one has discovered before with the use of their genius prompt than understand what a data feedback loop is.
"Oh man no dude but like even if it didn't exist before it did *now* because we talked about it! Now the AIs now about the shitty art and make it on their own! It's reality equals perception bro!"
Yeah, maybe people shouldn't write dogshit articles about it and circulate it then if they understand how stupid this actually is instead of mystifying it as a self-suck creepypasta for a literal-who tier content creator. I know how web scraping and search optimization works, you're just creating the conditions where bad art AI will just start using prompts from bad AI art in it's dataset until the technology is unusable. It's *literally* just AI inbreeding creating pug-ified Habsberg-baby ass results. That was going to happen anyway eventually but your just stepping at the gas at this point and it gives me the same frustration as watching someone purposefully misuse a powertool in a way that will just burn the motor out. I think AI art is a fun utility for references or digital matte painting / collage but I'm not sure how much I can suffer pseudointellectual technobabble acting like they've found a way to digitize chaos magic. Especially when you're just breaking it then acting like you're higher on the World Tree for it. You're not making AI art cooler, you're just making magic lamer.