*scratches at your writing itch more* cāmon give us more about your writing give us that good olā fashioned yapping
LETS FREAKING GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
So if you are a tag reader and have existed on my blog for an extended period of time, then you may recall me mentioning that I really should go on a rant about Loki. Multiple times even. And there is a good reason for thatā she is one of the most interesting characters to analyze and write for in feh.
That might seem like an odd claim, but you must remember that your reliable narrator finds immense joy in writing for Kiran fire emblem. Kiran is fun for a few reasons, but the work loop is what really sells it. There is a character beyond the self insert, but it must be found and then extrapolated back. Detective work goes into their analysis and then more free form creativity is employed to inflict that personality back onto the narrative. Loki provides a similar experience. Sheās an almost equally blank slate. Harsh comparison considering Kiran is a non entity of a self insert, but true nonetheless. Currently, as of the very start of book 9, Loki is not much of a character. I hope to be proven wrong in the near future, but right now that is the case.
The issue can most easily be broken down into one core question: what does Loki want? No, seriously, what does she want? Sheās the only reoccurring character in which we have no idea about anything that drives her. You might argue that this is supposed to be part of her mystique, but then Iād argue that you donāt understand what builds mystique. You know who also had mystique? LĆf and Thrasir, LƦraưor and the Healing Hands, Gullvieg, and about every other antagonistic force whose full motives were not initially clear. Just because we did not know the full extent of what drove them, did not mean that we didnāt get a sense of something they wanted. The most common thing these antagonists want is to kill our heroes, which is why conflict arises in the first place.
What does Loki want in comparison? To cause Chaosā¢ļø? That is a cop-out in the same way writing Harley Quinn as just a crazy random lady is. It is an excuse to not write a consistent character and just hoping that surface level aesthetics will carry everything on its emancipated shoulders. To what end does Loki want to cause chaos? For what reasons? What could possibly stand in her way? What conflict could arise from that? Every other character has straight forward answers to these basic questions, but even after 8 seasons of this narrative, we still donāt have anything for this lady. And thatās a blatant flaw of FEH. Which is a shame, because as I was digging to find ways to fill the gaps, some genuinely interesting ideas came up.
This starts with the FEHās pantheon. It is a vital part of the narrativeās themes of loneliness, isolation, and connection. Being the villains 80% of the time, they are often a pure distillation of the long term effects of isolation. Hel is a fascinating introduction to this idea that gains more intrigue in retrospect. Unlike every divine encounter after her, she is the sole god we meet in book 3. Itās an unspoken rule, but they typically arise in contrasting pairs. Askr and Embla, Nifl and MĆŗspell, Freyr and Freya, etc. It is revealed that Hel was not an exception to this rule, but had successfully killed her equal and opposite of Ymir long before she ever set foot in Askr. With no one left to naturally counter her, sheās been fueling her endless need for more power free of natural consequence. Without life, death has gone utterly power mad. Upon her throne of corpses, she is entirely isolated and free to view every breathing being as lesser. To really drive this home, they reveal that her only connection to a living thing, Eir, to be a lie. She is a need for power, left by itself to rot.
Then we have the siblings Freyr and Freya, who were implied to be the weird black sheep of the pantheon and thus only had each other. Freyr is notedly one of the few non antagonistic gods and this correlates with his apparent social life. He talks to people! Regularly! According to Peony, anytime anyone has any issue in the realm of dreams, they go to him. He has taken the time to build a community and make himself the beating heart of it. Heās getting some god damn therapy. Good for him! Freya has unfortunately done no such thing and hasnāt moved on from the harm inflicted upon them in the past. She has power, beauty, and fame, but Freyr is still the only person she has. But now, the reverse is no longer true and heās pulling further away. This nags at the long standing wound of never being accepted and Freya sees this as rejection from the one person in this horrible cruel world who wasnāt supposed to do that to her. Everything goes to hell from there. This need for acceptance is left by itself to rot.
Now, this was supposed to be a discussion of Loki, no? Why bring this up? Well, itās because sheās an oddity. Hel, Freya, and Freyr generally define the types of gods we see from this point onwards. We either got isolated and rocking it (Hel, MĆŗspell), isolated and crying in the club (Freya, Gullveig, Nifl), or finally getting some god damn therapy for the isolation but ultimately not being able to fully escape it in time (Freyr, Askr). Loki is not quite any of these things. And as I was trying to rationalize why there was an exception to this theme I found, it dawned on meā itās not that she isnāt any of these things, itās that sheās on the verge of becoming one of them. What makes Loki unique among the pantheon is that sheās the only god we see meeting and connecting with people throughout the narrative. Thatās the point. Nothing has begun to rot yet. Her powers are shapeshifting and pretending to be a person, because sheās actually on the verge of potentially becoming one.
Letās use her dynamic with Veronica as an example. Loki genuinely likes Veronica. She finds the girl silly and cute. However, she had alterer motives from the moment they met, as she was still working for Surtr at the time and befriended the young princess so that she could be ultimately sacrificed to the rite of flames. And even outside of that, she needed her help to begin the Tempest. It was a lie from the start, and yet, Loki gives our protagonists an opening to save her. Thatās fascinating. She does not value Veronicaās life or wellbeing above her schemes, but she likes her enough to actively go out of her way to give her a chance. If I didnāt know any better, thatās a fascinating set up for a long term character conflict. Loki, the chaotic trickster god plotting to bring change and ruin, vs Loki, a quirky shapeshifter lady teaching Princess Veronica funny little tricks like how to heal paper cuts and not lose her breakfast when quickly dimension hoping to the realm of the dead.
Thatās so god damn fun and is a version of the character that would bring so much life to the narrative. But itās not really what we got and might not be what we ultimately get either. And thatās okay, Iām pretty down for whatever they choose to do. But until then, Your Honor, hit that trickster god with an identity crisis. Hit her with the silly beam. Let the two tacticians hang out and be kinda toxic besties. What could go wrong? Oh, thereās a character named Baldur? Surely this wonāt result in a chain of events that culminates in the end of the world.