Googles Suchmaschine hat sich zu einem fast so schönen Geschäft entwickelt wie einst die Software-Lizenzen von Microsoft. Und ähnlich wie damals treten die Wettbewerbshüter auf den Plan. Unterstützt werden sie von einer rührigen Initiative. Deren wichtigster Förderer ist: Microsoft.
Hier der Text von Steffan Heuer
German Economic Magazine brand eins interviewed Shivaun Raff, Christoph Waitz, Michael Weber and others - only available in print and to subscribers.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Last week, Google started charging for enterprise access to Google Maps meaning that with enough use, users could face huge fees to access Google Map’s API.
In this case, some heavy users (including Apple and Foursquare) have opted for an open-source product called OpenStreetMap. “Is that as good as an app that uses billions of dollars in digital mapping technology?” reports NBC4. “Oh, hell no.”
What happened to free?
Digital Trends explains the “price of free”:
“It’s important to note that of all the major digital map-makers, only Google was offering access to its maps for free. Firms like Navteq and TeleNav recoup their investments by sell their mapping services to third parties — Navteq powers Garmin GPS units and Bing Maps, for example; TeleNav sells its own GPS and powers things like MyTouch Ford in-vehicle systems. Google, however, chose to zig instead of zag: It offered its digital mapping services for free to essentially anybody who wanted them. The idea was to make Google’s online mapping service a de facto standard for digital maps on the Web and in mobile devices. Once Google had established a serious presence in the digital mapping marketplace, it would figure out a way to monetize the service.”
"The fees to use Google Maps probably aren’t what’s starting to put off companies like Foursquare and Apple — it’s probably the ever-increasing reach of Google’s advertising efforts. Third parties may not be comfortable acting as windows for Google’s advertising platform, and that’s particularly true for firms that compete against Google in one way or another — whether that be offering location-based deals or a leading mobile platform. The upshot is that consumers can expect more and more services to gradually shift away from Google Maps towards less-encumbered alternatives like OpenStreetMap — particularly if their business interests in any way bring them into competition with Google."
Read more of Geoff Duncan's in-depth report at digitaltrends.com
Google’s monopolist roadmap?
Use Google’s huge search advertising revenues to subsidize the development and use of other Google products – in this case Maps.
Offer it for free, undercutting other companies’ ability to compete on a product’s merits (who else can afford to offer this product for free?) or recoup their investment in innovation.
Make users and partners dependent on your software.
Handicap other offerings by preferencing your own product and/or handicapping competitive threats (in this case, Google contractors were purposefully modifying OpenStreetMaps with misinformation), “switching the direction of one-way streets, for example,” TPMIdeaLab reports.
Impose high prices when partners are already heavily invested with the Google offering.
Which products are next?
Google has started charging for Analytics and has been working very hard to get small businesses hooked on a full suite of Google products.
What about when Google looks to charge everyday consumers for the use of products like Gmail, Google Docs or Picasa?
