#factsoverfear

When the government claims it can suspend rights for one targeted group, it is not creating a narrow exception — it is setting a precedent that weakens protections for everyone. History shows this pattern over and over: rights are first stripped from the most vulnerable, then expanded outward.

If authorities can ignore due process, enter homes without warrants, restrict protest, or detain people without hearings for some, they can eventually do it to anyone. Rights don’t erode in isolation — they erode collectively.

You don’t defend freedom by deciding who “deserves” rights. You defend freedom by defending the principle that rights belong to people — not just to those in power’s favor.

An attack on one group’s rights is always a test run for attacking everyone’s.

We already pool resources to protect people, stabilize society, and make daily life possible. Fire departments. Roads. Schools. Social Security. Medicare. Food safety. Emergency response. Veterans’ benefits.

That isn’t some radical experiment — it’s how a functioning society works.

The real question isn’t “Do you support socialism?”

It’s “Which shared systems are you willing to dismantle — and who pays the price when you do?”

Fear thrives on labels.

Reality lives in outcomes.

A government that serves people isn’t the threat.

A government captured by ignorance, misinformation, and manufactured fear is.

Here’s the point:

If we benefit from shared systems, we should at least be honest about it.

The Truth of Affirmation: Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Children

Dismantling the Myth of "Forced Transition" and Detailing the Staged, Ethical Reality of Care

In honor of Nex Benedict, Leelah Alcorn (who sparked my awareness), Charlotte Fosgate, Jazlynn Johnson, Tayy Dior Thomas, Pauly Likens, Brianna Ghey, Jacob Williamson, Morgan Moore, JJ Bright, Jasmine Cannady, Ollie Taylor, Brayla Stone—and every name I cannot type, every name that was never reported and erased by their “families”, every name that deserves memory. You, each of you, were children who deserved life. 

We can best honor the dead by protecting the living.

In contemporary political discourse, few topics generate as much fear and vitriol as the discussion surrounding transgender children. At the heart of this panic is a devastating and persistent piece of misinformation: the idea that parents, doctors, or activists are "forcing children to transition" through immediate and irreversible medical intervention. This narrative is a fundamental logical failure, serving only to inflame bias, erode trust in medical professionals, and, most critically, harm the very children it claims to protect.

To honor National Trans Children Day, we must set aside the emotionally charged rhetoric and apply a logical, ethical, and evidence-based analysis to what gender-affirming care truly is. The reality of care for prepubescent and adolescent trans youth is overwhelmingly non-medical, staged, reversible, and always driven by the child’s persistent, informed identity, not by coercion. This piece will dismantle the myth of forced transition and outline the consensus-driven, three-tiered framework of care endorsed by every major medical and mental health organization in the United States and globally.

I. The Logical Failure of the "Forced Transition" Narrative

The argument that children are being "forced" into permanent medical procedures collapses under scrutiny because it fundamentally misunderstands both the nature of gender identity and the rigorous, slow-moving consensus established by pediatric and psychological medicine.

A. Gender Identity is Innate, Not Taught

Gender identity is a person’s internal sense of being male, female, both, neither, or somewhere else on the spectrum. It is distinct from sexual orientation and sex assigned at birth. For transgender children, this realization is not a new fad or a sudden, fleeting choice; for many, the dissonance between their internal sense of self and their external presentation is evident as soon as they can articulate language, often between the ages of three and five.

Medical and psychological science widely accepts that gender identity is innate and develops early. No one can make a child genuinely feel like a gender they are not. The role of the parent, teacher, or clinician is not to create an identity, but to recognize and affirm the one the child is persistently and consistently expressing. The false premise of "forced transition" fails because it assumes that the child’s identity is mutable and that external pressure can dictate an internal sense of self, a concept contradicted by decades of developmental psychology.

B. The Professional Consensus

Every major medical authority has concluded that gender-affirming care—which begins with social support—is the standard of practice because it is medically necessary and life-saving. These organizations include:

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

The American Medical Association (AMA)

The American Psychological Association (APA)

The Endocrine Society

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH)

These bodies all affirm that distress resulting from gender non-affirmation (known as gender dysphoria) is a serious medical condition that, when left untreated, leads to catastrophic outcomes, including significantly elevated rates of depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicide. The intervention is not to fulfill a whim; it is to treat a recognized, often debilitating condition. To deny care is to practice non-affirming care, which is proven to be detrimental to the child's well-being.

C. The Ethical Precedent: Intersex Children and Forced Intervention

The debate over medical intervention on minors has a powerful and tragic historical precedent that is often overlooked: intersex children. An intersex person has biological variations in sex characteristics (chromosomes, gonads, or anatomy), which are distinct from gender identity but critically relevant to discussions of surgical intervention on minors.

For decades, intersex infants with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) were routinely subjected to non-consensual, irreversible genital surgeries—often purely cosmetic—in infancy or early childhood. These interventions were performed not for medical necessity, but to "normalize" the child's appearance to fit rigid societal gender binaries, regardless of the child's actual future gender identity. This practice caused profound physical and psychological trauma, a practice now widely condemned by human rights and medical bodies.

There is a cruel irony in the public panic over affirming care for trans youth: the same voices often ignore the documented history of forcing irreversible surgeries on intersex children. Today, best practice for intersex care strongly advocates delaying any irreversible genital surgery until the child is old enough to participate in the informed consent process. This ethical mandate—delay irreversible decisions until the minor can consent—is precisely the principle that governs and safeguards gender-affirming care for transgender adolescents. While not all intersex individuals are transgender, this history proves that non-consensual genital intervention on minors is a real, documented harm that affirmation protocols are specifically designed to prevent.

II. Gender-Affirming Care: The Staged, Non-Medical Reality

The most crucial counterpoint to the "forced transition" myth is the fact that gender-affirming care is a staged process where medical intervention is almost entirely absent for children before puberty. The first and most essential stage is purely social and psychological affirmation.

A. Stage 1: Social Transition (The Only Step for Prepubescent Children)

For children (typically ages 3–12) who are consistently and persistently expressing a transgender identity, the initial, and often only, form of "transition" is social transition. This involves changes that are completely non-medical, non-invasive, and entirely reversible.

Name and Pronouns: Using the child's chosen name and pronouns. This simple act validates their identity and dramatically reduces distress.

Clothing and Hair: Allowing the child to wear clothes, choose hairstyles, and engage in activities traditionally associated with their affirmed gender.

Affirming Environment: Ensuring teachers, friends, and family support the child's identity, providing a stable, non-judgemental environment.

Crucially, this is where the vast majority of "transition" for young children ends. No prepubescent child is receiving surgeries or hormones. A social transition is akin to a child deciding they want to be called "Rikki" instead of their given name or insisting on only wearing blue. If their identity changes in the future—which occurs in some cases—the social transition can be immediately reversed.

B. Stage 2: Mental Health & Assessment (The Gatekeeping Process)

The second stage of care, which begins as the child approaches adolescence, involves intensive mental health screening and counseling. This stage is effectively the professional gatekeeping mechanism that ensures the identity is genuine, persistent, and well-understood by the patient and family.

Thorough Psychological Evaluation: The child must be seen by multiple licensed mental health professionals (LCSWs, psychologists, psychiatrists) over an extended period. These professionals assess for co-occurring mental health conditions (like anxiety, depression, or Autism/AuDHD, which often co-occur with gender diversity) to ensure the gender dysphoria is primary and not secondary to another condition.

Informed Consent and Capacity: The multidisciplinary team (MDT) assesses the child’s and family's capacity to understand the risks, benefits, and long-term implications of any future medical steps. No steps proceed without the informed consent of the minor (assent) and the guardians.

The "Watchful Waiting" Myth: The historical model of "watchful waiting" (delaying affirmation in hopes the identity will change) has been largely replaced by affirmative care because data shows that affirming a child's identity, even if it later changes, causes less psychological harm than denying or suppressing their identity. Affirmation is the best treatment for distress, regardless of the child's ultimate path.

III. Medical Affirmation: Rigor and Reversibility in Adolescence

When medical steps are considered, they are introduced gradually and only begin after puberty has started and after the child has gone through the extensive assessment process outlined above. The notion of a "forced permanent surgery" for a child is a sensationalist fabrication.

A. Puberty Blockers (The First Medical Step)

The first and most commonly discussed medical intervention is the use of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonists, commonly called puberty blockers. These are introduced typically in early to mid-adolescence (Tanner Stage 2 or 3 of puberty).

Purpose: Puberty blockers temporarily pause the production of sex hormones (testosterone or estrogen) that trigger the development of secondary sex characteristics (voice deepening, breast growth, etc.).

Reversibility: This treatment is fully reversible. If a patient decides to stop taking the blockers, puberty will resume where it left off. They serve as a crucial "pause button," giving the adolescent more time—often years—to solidify their identity before considering potentially permanent changes.

Logical Necessity: For a transgender adolescent, going through the puberty of their assigned sex is medically and psychologically agonizing (known as refractory gender dysphoria). Puberty blockers are a lifeline that prevents permanent, identity-dissonant physical changes (like a deep voice or breast development) that would later require far more invasive and expensive procedures to mitigate.

B. Hormone Therapy (The Second Medical Step)

Cross-sex hormone therapy (estrogen for trans girls, testosterone for trans boys) is generally started in mid- to late adolescence (around age 16 or later) after extensive mental health evaluation and the successful use of blockers.

Partial Reversibility: Hormone therapy initiates changes that are partially reversible (e.g., body fat redistribution, cessation of menses) and partially non-reversible (e.g., voice deepening in those taking testosterone, breast growth in those taking estrogen).

Informed Consent: Due to the irreversible changes, the criteria for starting hormones are significantly stricter, requiring confirmation from multiple specialists that the adolescent has the capacity to consent and that the gender dysphoria is persistent and severe.

No Immediate Surgery: This is a vital point of fact: Genital surgeries (bottom surgery) are almost universally not performed on minors in the U.S. and globally. Chest surgery (top surgery) for trans masculine adolescents may be performed, but only typically around the age of 16-18, and only after long-term psychological assessment and parental consent. The sensationalist image of a young child being rushed into permanent surgery is entirely divorced from medical reality.

IV. The Ethical Imperative: Why Affirmation is Life-Saving

The political and media obsession with the potential for future regret—a risk that exists for all medical interventions, including cosmetic surgery and non-gender-related procedures—ignores the immediate, verifiable catastrophe of non-affirmation.

A. The Crisis of Suicidality

Data unequivocally links gender non-affirmation to mental health crises:

Studies show that over 50% of transgender youth consider suicide, and nearly 20% attempt it.

A major study by The Trevor Project found that trans youth who received gender-affirming medical care (like puberty blockers or hormones) had significantly lower odds of reporting recent depression and suicidal ideation. For those receiving social affirmation, the impact was similarly profound.

The ethical question is simple: When a minor faces a recognized medical condition (gender dysphoria) that carries a high risk of fatality (suicide), and the standard of care (affirmation) is proven to mitigate that risk, denying that care based on political panic is medically and ethically indefensible. The choice for parents and clinicians is not between "trans or cis," but between affirmation and despair.

B. The De-Transition and Regret Argument

The risk of regret (or "de-transition") is often weaponized by opponents of care. However, data collected globally consistently shows that regret rates are extremely low—often less than 1% for medical transitions—and are typically lower than those for non-gender-related cosmetic surgeries. Furthermore, "de-transition" is often a reflection of external factors (loss of job, family rejection, societal stigma) rather than a change in core identity, proving that the stigma is the problem, not the care itself.

C. Moving Forward: A Call for Compassion and Logic

National Trans Children Day must serve as a reminder that these are children pursuing authenticity, not a political agenda. The logical approach is clear: Trust the patient, trust the professionals, and affirm the identity. The staged, reversible, and psychologically rigorous path of gender-affirming care is the best and only ethical way to ensure these children survive and thrive.

We must shift the national conversation from one based on fear and fiction to one based on fact, compassion, and the fundamental right of every child to live authentically and safely.

TL;DR (Too Long; Didn't Read)

The central lie—that children are being "forced to transition"—is false. Gender-affirming care is safe, ethical, and staged.

For Prepubescent Children (Ages 3-12): Care is 100% Social (Name, Pronouns, Clothing) and is completely reversible. No medical procedures are used.

For Adolescents: Medical care only begins after extensive psychological screening and if gender dysphoria is severe and persistent.

First Step: Puberty Blockers are used to create a fully reversible "pause button," giving the teen years to decide.

Second Step: Hormones are started later and are partially reversible.

Final Step: Genital Surgery is virtually never performed on minors.

Ethical Imperative: Major medical bodies (AAP, AMA, WPATH) endorse affirmation because it is life-saving, significantly reducing the risk of depression, self-harm, and the high rate of suicide among non-affirmed trans youth. The historical precedent of forced non-consensual surgeries on intersex infants proves the documented harm of unnecessary early intervention, reinforcing the need for youth autonomy.

The problem is not the care; it is the political prejudice and misinformation that harms these children. We can, as an entire society, learn, grow, and do our best to keep our kids upright and breathing. They deserve life.

The Trevor Project: A 24/7 crisis intervention and suicide prevention service for LGBTQ+ youth.

USA Phone: 1-866-488-7386

USA Text: Text "START" to 678-678

USA 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Provides free, confidential, 24/7 support for anyone in emotional distress.

Phone: Call or text 988

USA Trans Lifeline: A peer support hotline run by and for transgender people.

Ο μεγαλύτερος λευκός καρχαρίας που έχει καταγραφεί μέχρι σήμερα στον Ατλαντικό Ωκεανό εντοπίστηκε από ερευνητές της θαλάσσιας ζωής, ανοιχτά της Φλόριντα. Δείτε αυτή τη δημοσίευση στο Instagram. Η δημοσίευση κοινοποιήθηκε από το χρήστη OCEARCH (@ocearch) Με μήκος σχεδόν 4 μέτρα και βάρος 750 κιλά, ο Contender – όπως ονομάστηκε – εντοπίστηκε από επιστήμονες τους ιδρύματος OCEARCH, οι οποίοι του…