"Cut it Out!"
âThe Samuraiâ Adaptation- âCut it out!â(160)
We all get attached to parts of our writing that at first seem great but later on hinder the rest of our work.  It is important, that while you can come up with what you think is an exceptional analysis at the time that you are able to go over your original thoughts and bring yourself to cut out and be open to changing things that may not fit on a second glance. For an analysis of a piece of literature it is better to go straight to the point instead of fluffing your writing with unnecessary fillers that will guide you away from the idea you are trying to analyze. The point of analysis is to take a position and defend it to create understanding. You cannot create clear understanding when you have a clutter of separate ideas. Once you have your topic at hand and are able to write about it then you can see what details are important and which you can leave out. For example, say you are analyzing Victor's character in Mary Shelleyâs Frankenstein and his inability to take responsibility for his actions and somehow stray upon his obsession with old style natural philosophy. Somehow you have started analyzing his obsession with mystic science and totally abandoned your original thesis. You have so many great ideas buzzing in your mind and can see yourself writing papers for all of them, but at the moment you only need one. LET IT GO. I know while I am writing an analysis paper I tend to want to add conflicting themes that diverge from my point and get emotionally attached to my ideas. If you interject a line or two that was not supporting your argument or analysis then you should probably bring yourself to eliminate them and continue on with evidence that will make your analysis stronger instead of straying the readerâs attention to other details you did not intend them to stray to. If your second thesis is growing to great lengths and you find yourself more engaged and ready to provide more evidence for this new thesis then you should probably throw away the original thesis and build with this new idea. The process of editing can lead you to realize what you are more passionate about. If you are more passionate about a topic you tend to be able to write more enthusiastically about it. Sometimes it is necessary when developing your argument to be able tell yourself it is okay to start over and change ideas. The strategy is to be honest with what works and what can be taken out (161). Another example would be if you find a piece of evidence that supports your analysis. It could be a beautiful line in the novel and you decided to write your analysis surrounding that one line. Later, you find that perhaps that line was not as strong of evidence as you originally thought but you find something much simpler that works. You have to bring yourself to be able to make that swap that will contribute the most to your writing, because I know personally I have fallen for beautiful lines that I thought would work but realize that I only wanted them in there because they were beautiful and not because they would support my analysis. It all boils down to edits. Be able to revise and tear apart your paper to get down to the significant aspects that will deliver the message strongly and clearly.  If you find yourself getting lost and meandering from your analysis just think of a samurai and âcut it out!â
Goldberg, Natalie. âThe Samurai.â Writing Down the Bones. 1986. Boston: Shambhala. Print. (pages 159-161)
Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein. 3rd ed. Broadview Editions, 2012. Print.












