#electronicrecords

🔗 Review the compliance checklist and see how your electronic records system measures up: https://lnkd.in/da8C5AYz

💡 Struggling with rising healthcare costs? KiviCare’s electronic records system is here to help! 🌟 Say goodbye to paperwork and hello to financial efficiency. 💼💻 Simplify operations, reduce errors, and save money with KiviCare! 🏥📊

In conclusion, Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs) are not just tools for HOS compliance but also powerful assets for optimizing maintenance scheduling in commercial fleets. By harnessing real-time data insights, automated reminders, and historical analysis provided by ELDs, fleet managers can enhance vehicle reliability, minimize downtime, and ensure regulatory compliance. Choosing the right ELD solution, investing in training, and integrating ELDs with fleet management software are key steps towards maximizing the benefits of ELDs in maintenance scheduling. For businesses seeking to streamline their maintenance operations and stay ahead in the competitive transportation industry, embracing ELD technology is a strategic decision that yields long-term efficiency and cost savings.

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Debra A. Patt, MD, PhD, MBA, FASCO Editor-in-chief of the Journal of Clinical Oncology - Clinical Cancer Informatics Medical oncologist at Texas Oncology, and US Oncology Research Breast Cancer Committee member MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? Response: Cancer care is increasing in complexity with differentiation of cancer subtypes, new treatments, and treatment sequences and combinations.  Complying with evidence based therapy has become an increasing challenge.  We see that compliance with guideline based care across the country is highly variable. Our study evaluated an electronic health record based Clinical Decision Support System to facilitate compliance with evidence based guidelines--or pathways--to deliver care to adult patients with cancer. MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?  Response: In evaluating almost 30,000 patients across 9 statewide practices we found that The Clinical decision support system DOES significantly improve compliance with evidence based treatment Assessable data and understanding of variance reporting also improved substantially Clinical Decision Support Systems are a way to influence clinician behavior at the point of care and drive high quality cancer care  MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report? In complex systems like cancer care, clinical decision support is a clinical informatics tool that can improve the quality of care.  Given the tremendous variability across the country in compliance with evidence based guidelines, it is a tremendous enhancement in cancer care quality. The system we use, clear value plus, is actually a value based guideline pathway that incorporates the best, least toxic, highest value treatment choices so it is also a way to steward healthcare spending. MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work?  Clinical decision support systems can grow and become more useful and patients and providers will benefit. Clinical decision support and other clinical informatics solutions introduce efficiency and can enhance the quality of patient care and the patient experience. We now link our clinical decision support system to educational information to patients so when their doctor discusses new treatments they have a tailored document that summarizes the discussion. Growing these systems to enhance healthcare quality and enhance the patient experience improves patient care.  Any disclosures? This research was conducted within The US Oncology Network, and I am a Vice President of Texas Oncology and a Medical Director of Analytics for McKesson.  Citation: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2045 Journal of Clinical Oncology 38, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2020) 2045-2045. Published online May 25, 2020. The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.   Read the full article

Dr. Bishnoi Rohit Bishnoi, M.D. Division of Hematology and Oncology Department of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville, FL MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? Response: National Healthcare expenditure was $3.6 trillion in 2018 and 17.7% of Gross Domestic Product. Redundant laboratory testing is one part of this problem that is more pronounced in hospitalized patients as they are often seen by multiple physicians from the time of admission till discharge. This added burden on the US health care system leads to increased costs, decreased patient satisfaction, and unnecessary phlebotomy. It also leads to iatrogenic anemia over time and unnecessary transfusions. The Choosing Wisely initiative recommendation from the Society of Hospital Medicine, Society for the Advancement of Blood Management, and the Critical Care Societies Collaborative have recommended avoiding repetitive labs. As one of the physicians in the division of hospital medicine at the University of Florida (UF) Health Shands hospital, we encountered this problem frequently where a patient will get multiple HbA1c or lipid profiles or iron studies during the same hospital stay without any clear clinical indication. Most often these tests were ordered by different physicians seeing the same patient and not realizing that either the test has already been ordered or sometimes it is related to practice pattern of physicians. We often heard complaints about this from our nursing and laboratory staff and, most importantly by patients themselves. MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings? Response: In September 2014 we designed a quality improvement project to tackle this head-on and coordinated a team of hospitalists, statisticians, information technology and laboratory staff. We identified 17 tests and optimal time window for reordering these tests by using best practice guidelines and expert opinion form sub-specialists from different divisions in the Department of Medicine. Once we identified these tests, we created a Best Practice Alert (BPA) which alerted the ordering physicians, if the test has been ordered or is being processed or resulted recently. BPA window displayed previous ordering time, collection time, resulting time and link to the results when available. This alert could be overridden depending on ordering physician discretion as per clinical scenario. This alert went into practice in September 2015 for all inpatient units including general, intermediate and intensive care units at the UF Health Shands hospital which is a 996-bed tertiary care facility. We collected and analyzed data for 34 months, 17 months each for pre and post-intervention. Results of the study showed that the intervention with Best Practice Alert resulted in an average overall reduction of 15.4% for the duplicate tests, with the maximum reduction for vitamin D (−58.7%), vitamin B12 (−49.6%), and respiratory viral panel nasopharynx swab (−33.4%). This intervention also showed an estimated overall savings of $72,543 over 17 months in the post-intervention period. MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report? Response: In the current scenario with rising health care costs, we should use the full functionality of electronic medical records to help our patients. With this simple but effective intervention, we were able to reduce redundant labs and produced significant cost savings. This intervention has resulted in a change that is permanent and can be applied to other tests as well. MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work? Response: We believe that this simple, no-cost intervention can be applied to most of the laboratory tests in hospitalized patients. This gentle reminder can lead to change in practice patterns as well. During our study we did not receive any negative feedback of excessive BPA or workflow disruptions. MedicalResearch.com: Is there anything else you would like to add? Response: Although we reviewed the available guidelines and sought expert opinion within our institution, we felt that there is a lack of consensus. There is limited data from the relevant national societies on optimal duration between laboratory tests. No relevant financial disclosures​ Citation: Bejjanki H, Mramba LK, Beal SG, Radhakrishnan N, Bishnoi R, Shah C, Agrawal N, Harris N, Leverence R, Rand K. The role of a best practice alert in the electronic medical record in reducing repetitive lab tests. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;10:611-618 https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S167499 The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.   Read the full article