The subjects of unschooling and radical school reform have recently been brought to the forefront of my studies through various channels. In one class I am working on broad ideas surrounding teen engagement, use of technology, and formal education. In my personal research I've been studying the history of the public school system as well as many lines of alternative thought.
I begin to ask myself perplexing questions such as: what does a list of skills that I personally own look like?
Here's what I came up with:
1. Preparing food
Chopping food, knife skills
Preparing meat, knowing when meat is good/bad to eat
Knowing when food done cooking - safe to eat
How to combine spices/foods to make a flavor palate I enjoy eating
2. Working with children
Tolerance/love for children via a respect/understanding of their mind-sets
Knowledge of what physical requirements very young to toddler age children require
3. How to climb high mountains without equipment, to a certain degree of difficulty
4. How to sketch images I do/don't have in front of me for reference to a reasonable degree of accuracy
6. Basic understanding of Spanish, French
7. Proven ability to learn foreign languages if immersed in language
8. Ability to ride bicycle for upwards of 40 miles
9. Ability to carry a tune, and hear music/notes/pitch accurately
10. Basic sewing abilities, with and without machine
11. Comprehension skills, ability to make inferences, critical thinking, basic "design thinking"
12. Ability to critique, imbue taste, evaluate visual elements compared to natural standard
13. Superficial understanding of emerging technologies
I took this challenge due to a speech I read by Daniel Quinn, a cultural critic, who writes much on the subject of education and schooling. He talked about a question I struggled with during my time working at a day care with young children. I used to have a hard time describing to parents the major successes, as I saw them, of their child over the course of the 8 hours they were under my care each day. These were observations of advanced learning, many times of learning how to learn. They usually included moments of communication that went beyond simple speech, or complex physical experiments happening with multiple objects, in a trial and error type fashion, involving several major elements of physics, math, and sometimes even chemistry. These children were usually under two years old. My main problem was that the consistent milestones I heard from parents in terms of their kid's successes and learning goals usually revolved around the memorization of facts. I'm referring to the names of people, colors, animals, sounds animals make, etc. While these moments prove very exciting to adults, myself included, as time went on I began to wonder a very simple statement: why are parents so concerned with things their child will learn no matter what, to a near definite certainty, sometime in the future?
I always felt helpless with this question, as I grappled even with how to explain my feelings on the matter to my colleagues. Getting back to Daniel Quinn, I found a cohort.
"Working on the kindergarten and first-grade programs, I observed something that I thought was truly remarkable. In these grades, children spend most of their time learning things that no one growing up in our culture could possibly avoid learning. For example, they learn the names of the primary colors. Wow, just imagine missing school on the day when they were learning blue. You'd spend the rest of your life wondering what color the sky is. They learn to tell time, to count, and to add and subtract, as if anyone could possibly fail to learn these things in this culture. And of course they make the beginnings of learning how to read."
I'm not the only one! Next I began to wonder what skills are important and relevant to learn in school. Thus the list I composed earlier in the post. A clear majority of these skills that I now deem important I did not learn in school. Many of them I learned from my parents and friends. And the ones I did learn in school I only fully excelled at once in undergraduate art school, where the education methods were vastly different than those in my public high school.
Quinn goes on to ask what skills are essential to humanity. He postulates on the outcomes of a cataclysmic even that would leave citizens struggling to survive, void of skills that most humans before us grew up learning such as knowing which plants are edible, how to build a shelter. He compares such skills to those learned in publics schools: how to extract a square root, how to analyze a poem, skills learned for the most part with no element of individualization, no care for a student's actual interests, or natural leanings. I think of A New Culture of Learning, and the Mechanistic Approach: "Learning is treated as a series of steps to be mastered[…]as if the students themselves were machines being programmed to accomplish tasks. The ultimate endpoint is efficiency. Learn as much as you can, as fast as you can. Measure by standardization" (Thomas, Brown, 35).
This all ties in for me with teen engagement. When has memorizing facts ever been engaging? Learning, and learning to learn is seductive, fun, inspiring. Most of the skills listed above I learned in extremely personal experiential ways, and many of them I taught myself.
I'll end part one with a quote from another "unschool" thinker, John Taylor Gatto: "…we need to trust children from a very early age with independent study." What does an independent study program look like for a 9th grader? A third grader? A kindergardener?
I will explore this specific idea, as well as my thoughts on individualized education, and home-schooling in part two of this post, next week.