#discernment

Next time you’re watching any news show or political coverage see how many of these you can spot:

Quick rundown of each propaganda technique:

• Glittering Generalities: Using vague, emotionally appealing words (like “freedom” or “justice”) that sound good but lack specific meaning.

• Transfer: Associating a person, idea, or product with something already respected or disliked (like using a flag, religion, or celebrity image) to carry over those feelings.

• Name-Calling: Attaching negative labels to an opponent or idea to create fear or distrust without real evidence.

• Card-Stacking: Presenting only positive information for one side and leaving out or distorting the negatives.

• Testimonial: Having a famous or respected person endorse an idea, product, or cause.

• Plain Folks: Presenting the speaker as an “ordinary” person to seem relatable and trustworthy.

“I want to do the thing because I view it as important, but trying to get myself to do the thing creates the same reaction as trying to put my hand on a hot stove would.” ← Executive dysfunction, a physical health problem that doesn’t answer to your own free will.

On the Advantages and Liabilities of Magical Thinking in Magical Practice

“The psychotic drowns in the same waters in which the mystic swims with delight.” – Joseph Campbell

There are certain temperaments that tend, more often than not, toward magical practice. They notice correspondences quickly. They feel atmosphere change when entering a room. They wake from dreams with entire landscapes intact and coherent. They detect rhythm in coincidence. They are rarely content with the flat explanation when a layered one is available. While these traits can deeply enrich one’s experience of the world, the same temperaments are also particularly vulnerable to misreading the world.

Heightened pattern recognition is not inherently mystical. It is simply the mind’s capacity to detect relationship. A practitioner who sees three crows in succession and pauses is not irrational; they are attentive. The question is whether that attentiveness is disciplined. Pattern recognition becomes magical thinking when it is unexamined. The mind that can weave meaning across distance can also weave illusion across absence. A string of unrelated events may be gathered into a narrative because the mind finds comfort in coherence. A dream may be treated as directive rather than digestion. A symbol may be taken as summons when it is merely familiarity. This is not a moral failing. It is an occupational hazard.

Strong imagination operates similarly. It is the faculty by which unseen forms become perceptible. Without imagination, spirits would rarely ever be encountered with any degree of intensity or clarity, because encounter requires a receptive medium. The imagination is that medium. Yet the imagination is also generative. It produces images without external stimulus. It elaborates. It embellishes. It intensifies. If a practitioner does not learn the temperament of their own imagination—how it behaves when bored, how it behaves when lonely, how it behaves when frightened—they risk mistaking its productions for visitation.

In my experience, what separates a gifted practitioner from a deluded one is not the presence or absence of imagination, but the presence of restraint. There is a tendency in modern discourse to equate skepticism with disenchantment and credulity with openness. But many traditions—especially ones that involve direct magical/spiritual investigation and mitigation—rarely operated this way. Many folk practitioners were and are profoundly pragmatic in their own right. A thing might be a spirit. It might also be damp air in the wall. One does not need to decide immediately. The disciplined practitioner permits ambiguity to remain. Magical thinking in its immature form insists upon meaning. In its matured form, it tolerates mystery without filling it. This distinction is subtle but decisive.

Consider coincidence. A practitioner with heightened pattern recognition may experience a series of related symbols in close succession. They might see a particular animal repeatedly, hear its name spoken unexpectedly, and dream of it that night. One response is to declare oneself chosen. Another is to note the pattern and wait. Patterns that persist without prompting tend to clarify themselves. Patterns that require constant reinforcement from the practitioner tend to dissolve when not fed. The imagination can amplify either pathway.

There are individuals whose minds are naturally porous. They perceive emotional undercurrents. They sense when something is about to occur. They anticipate shifts. This porosity can feel like psychic ability, and in some cases it may be precisely that. It can also be anxious vigilance, however. An anxious mind also scans for patterns, as a way to make sense of our circumstances and offer protective action. It also predicts outcomes. It also feels charged by small deviations in environment. And without careful self-study, the two can become indistinguishable.

To practice magic responsibly is to cultivate self-knowledge alongside perception. One must learn the texture of one’s own thoughts. Which ideas arrive quietly and remain steady? Which arrive in a rush and demand immediate action? Which are accompanied by fear? Which by stillness?

In my observation, genuine encounter tends toward steadiness. It does not need to shout. It does not flatter. It does not insist upon immediate identity change. The imagination, by contrast, often seeks drama. This is not to disparage drama. Many initiatory experiences are intense, and some encounters are world-shaking. But intensity in and of itself is not evidence.

There are practitioners who possess extraordinary imaginative capacity. They can construct elaborate inner landscapes and inhabit them fully. This can be a profound asset. Ritual often requires visualization. Relationship with non-ordinary beings often begins in imaginal space. However, the imaginal is not synonymous with the external or the true. A useful discipline is to differentiate between what one generates and what resists generation. If you attempt to alter an inner image and it alters easily, you are likely within your own construction. If it resists modification, behaves unpredictably, or introduces information you would not have chosen, the experience warrants further observation. Even then, caution remains appropriate.

Magical “giftedness,” if such a term is to be used at all, often consists in sensitivity. Sensitivity to pattern. Sensitivity to mood. Sensitivity to subtle change. These are not inherently supernatural traits. They are neurological and psychological tendencies that, when refined, allow one to perceive what others overlook. Yet, as William James observed, “The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook.”

But they can also render one susceptible to overwhelm. A mind that detects pattern everywhere may struggle to dismiss irrelevant stimuli. A mind that imagines vividly may struggle to rest. A mind that senses atmosphere may struggle to differentiate between personal emotion and environmental influence.

Thus the same traits that allow one to see hidden facets of reality can distort reality. The difference lies not in suppressing these faculties but in training them. In this context, training includes:

— Deliberate grounding in ordinary cause and effect.

— Verification when possible.

— Patience before conclusion.

— Acceptance of uncertainty.

It also includes humility. There is a particular danger in magical communities of rewarding dramatic narrative. The practitioner who reports grand visions and complex spirit courts is often given more attention than the practitioner who reports subtle shifts and quiet guidance. This can unconsciously encourage elaboration. The gifted practitioner often learns to be content with the modest. It is often the modest perception that proves most reliable.

Magical thinking, in its healthiest form, is not belief in fantasy, but recognition that the world may contain more than is immediately visible. Heightened pattern recognition, in its healthiest form, is not paranoia, but attentiveness to interrelation. Strong imagination, in its healthiest form, is not escapism, but an instrument for encounter. Each becomes curse when untethered. If a practitioner refuses all skepticism, they risk constructing an elaborate architecture of falsehood around themselves. If they refuse all imagination, they risk sealing themselves off from subtle perception entirely.

The work, then, is balance. One must allow the mind to wander without allowing it to rule. One must attend to pattern without worshiping it. One must imagine without conflating imagination with fact.

The land remains the land whether or not one is perceiving spirits. Wood remains wood whether or not it is being carved into a charm. Bills must be paid. Food must be cooked. Bodies must be cared for. If one’s magical thinking begins to erode these foundations, it is not a gift in that moment. Yet if one’s heightened perception allows them to notice when a place is disturbed, when an offering is ill-suited, when a relationship is unbalanced, then it is indeed a gift.

The very same faculty can mislead or reveal. It depends upon whether it is examined. In this way, magical temperament resembles fire. In the hearth, it warms and cooks. Uncontained, it consumes the house. The practitioner’s task is not to extinguish the fire of imagination or the spark of pattern recognition, but to learn the architecture within which they can safely burn.

Only then do these traits cease to be a liability and become what they were always capable of being: instruments of a wisdom and discernment.

—