If somebody could bring this up to @ aella-a I would be very glad for it, because I think, we got a big misunderstanding here and I am not able to tell her I’m sorry for this personally, because I got blocked way to fast.
If it’s someones perspective seeing the story as definitly gay, that’s fine. I can live with it. At last, if you take the Artbook it’s even canonical (but then the Artbook would make AshxBlanka canoncial, which seems a bit odd Oo).
I don’t even fully reject peoples thoughts that Ash is gay (why should I? It’s fine. Je just isn’t gay in my opinion. Bi, but not gay).
What I reject is the point, that people who don’t like gay couples in general shouldn’t read/ watch the story, because of WHY THE HECK? Or that they find it funny that some poeple don’t see that gay aspect in it (or at least not in one of the MCs). And I’m rejecting the though of Banana Fish being a romance, because it just isn’t. It’s a drama. Maybe a love drama (this depends on how heavy you link that aspect to the main story line), but still a drama. A romance ist, by definition, more light-harderd with a happy ending. At least where I live (we don’t call “Romeo and Juliet” a romance, we call it a love-drama, too). Or maybe I draw an example from anime: I would never ever call “Orange” a romance, despite clearly obvious romantic couples/ tropes here. Just because of the way the story is told, the topics it handles and all such. LIke Banana Fish all that romance/soulmate-stuff is just there to trapsot the main topic (which is most likely the same in both shows, two: Abuse).
And sorry for putting you in one drawer with those trolls out there, but blocking as soon as one winds up with another opinion just sems a little like trolling to me. I was born in the 80s and grew up in the 90s, so sorry I wasn’t lesbian back then (plus Japanese gay politics are a little diffrent from the west, maybe in Japan it would have been possible even back then. If the genre would have been established, which it wasn’*t, because it drew it’s source from a series of the same time. A shounen one.) I don’t project todays gay politics in tha manga (why should I? And tbh even today she could not tell this very important story of friendship, love and abuse if she goes for BL. Why? Because the Genre is limited.)
Plus I love it how the characters can be deciphered in different ways by differend audiences, that’s what makes this story so great for me. I even decipher them diffrent today then way back in the early 00s.
What about Eiji? Sure, he’s showing off his love for Ash very clearly sometimes. I mean, you even got that “marriage thing”, which is perfectly clear to me. I’m aware of that. But he hasn’t come out in the story, so you can watch even him as beinig asexual on that point (he is naive in his sexuality one must admit). Whenever I’m arguing against that gay aspect my arguments are purely drawn from what the story really TELLS you, not from what you have to decipher there.
So again, if anybody can contact her (?), tell her, it was maybe a great misunderstanding and I’m deeply sorry for that.
And, maybe I don’t want to see Ash as gay, because I want him for myself *coughs* So I reject this thing until Yoshida-sensei herself ist telling me open that he ist.