KNOW THE DIFFERENCE: South Africa vs. Nepal
from /r/vexillologycirclejerk Top comment: Oooooohh Thanks, I won't confuse these two again
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia
seen from Italy
seen from Cayman Islands
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from France

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from France
seen from Iceland
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Russia

seen from United Kingdom
KNOW THE DIFFERENCE: South Africa vs. Nepal
from /r/vexillologycirclejerk Top comment: Oooooohh Thanks, I won't confuse these two again

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Know the Difference: Ireland v. Ivory Coast
from /r/vexillology Top comment: Last year I bought a ivory coast flag so on St Patricks day I can swap it with my neighbor's irish flag and see if he notices. Lamest prank ever but I think it's funny
Know the Difference: Bahrain v. Qatar
from /r/vexillology Top comment: Bahrain's five white points are simpler and easier to remember than Qatar's nine, but they use the same red and white as seemingly half the world. Qatar uses a lovely shade that is unique to them, and stand out strongly in a crowd of flags. Using the nine points instead of five also makes the emphasis on the division, and not the individual points, which is a design choice in itself. All things considered, I think I much prefer the Qatar flag, it is a neat, unique, and attractive presentation. (Side by side like this, Bahrain's looks like a cheaper knock-off branding.)
Know the difference: Argentina vs. Central American coutries
from /r/vexillology Top comment: Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, and later Los Altos (now part of the Mexican state of Chiapas) formed the short-lived United Provinces of Central America (1824-1839), which adopted a flag very similar to (and inspired by) that of Argentina (also known at the time as the United Provinces of South America) (It should say Vertical in the last one)
New Post has been published on Bee Trends
New Post has been published on http://www.beetrends.com/see-what-a-difference-a-few-decades-make-in-these-historic-before-and-afters-2/
See What A Difference A Few Decades Make In These Historic Before And Afters
The times they are a-changinââŚ
Itâs truly amazing to see how much progress has been accomplished in an incredibly short period of time in human history. If you donât believe me, these pictures from recent history will prove the point. From manâs inability to fly, to landing on a comet a hundred years later, thereâs no question of what a little time can doâŚ
1. In 1894, Otto Lilienthal made the first glider flight.
In 1901, Annie Edson Taylor became the first person to survive a trip over Niagara Falls in a barrel.
Perhaps most daring, Felix Baumgartner took a plunge from the stratosphere (24 miles above Earth).
2. When the Wright brothers took a photo of their 59 second, 852 foot flight, they did so because they didnât think anyone would believe them.
But we all became believers when in 2014, a probe which had travelled 4 billion miles landed on a comet.
3. Kathrine Switzer was assaulted by Boston Marathon organisers who attempted (unsuccessfully) to stop her from running the mens-only race in 1967.
In 2014 though, almost as many women qualified for the marathon as men did.
4. As the first guest on the David Letterman Show in 1983, who knew where the pair would go.
The duo would share the screen again in 2014, along with a star of this generation, Lady Gaga.
5. In 1918, a French soldier whose face was mutilated in World War One had to be fitted with a prosthetic mask.
But in 2011, doctors carried out the first full face transplant on Dallas Wiens who lost all of his face in an accident.
6. In the first official gay pride march, London police had to be used for protection.
During the 2014 LGBT London pride parade though, marchers were flanked by supporters instead.
7. The first International match at Wimbledon had just a few dozen (rich) spectators in 1883.
Come today⌠and good luck getting a ticket.
8. The first Rockefeller Christmas tree on the construction site of the tower in 1931.
Today, itâs a little⌠different.
Dying to see more? Check out the next page for more eye candy!
9. In the 1903 first World Series, the Pittsburgh crowd swarmed the field and play continued.
Pretty sure that wouldnât fly today.
10. The first photo taken from space was strapped to a V2 rocket in 1946.
Pictures from space today are a little more⌠detailed.
11. The first climber to reach the summit of Everest was Sir Edmund Hillary in 1953.
Judging by the traffic today though, youâd guess it was commonplace.
12. The first World Cup final was held in 1930 in Montevideo, Uruguay. However, only 13 teams entered because of the difficulty of getting to South America at the time and thus Uruguay defeated Argentina 4-2.
In 2014, 209 countries were eligible to qualify.
13. With only 16 nations allowed to compete in the first modern Olympics (1896), only three men actually raced.
206 nations were in attendance during the 2012 London games.
14. The first neon light was installed in Vegas in 1941.
Which is a FAR cry from todayâs Sin City.
15. Western Berliners looked on as work began on the Berlin wall in 1961.
This past year, Berliners celebrated the anniversary of the wallâs fall, and marked itâs former path with illuminated balloons.
16. The first photograph of the moon, taken in 1839.
The first photograph of Earth taken from the moon in 1969.
A picture of both the Earth and moon from Chinaâs Changâe 5-TI satellite in 2014.
(via Distractify)
These photos are truly priceless. The advancements weâve made, the changes weâve seen⌠just make me excited to see what the future holds.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
New Post has been published on Bee Trends
New Post has been published on http://www.beetrends.com/see-what-a-difference-a-few-decades-make-in-these-historic-before-and-afters/
See What A Difference A Few Decades Make In These Historic Before And Afters
The times they are a-changinââŚ
Itâs truly amazing to see how much progress has been accomplished in an incredibly short period of time in human history. If you donât believe me, these pictures from recent history will prove the point. From manâs inability to fly, to landing on a comet a hundred years later, thereâs no question of what a little time can doâŚ
1. In 1894, Otto Lilienthal made the first glider flight.
In 1901, Annie Edson Taylor became the first person to survive a trip over Niagara Falls in a barrel.
Perhaps most daring, Felix Baumgartner took a plunge from the stratosphere (24 miles above Earth).
2. When the Wright brothers took a photo of their 59 second, 852 foot flight, they did so because they didnât think anyone would believe them.
But we all became believers when in 2014, a probe which had travelled 4 billion miles landed on a comet.
3. Kathrine Switzer was assaulted by Boston Marathon organisers who attempted (unsuccessfully) to stop her from running the mens-only race in 1967.
In 2014 though, almost as many women qualified for the marathon as men did.
4. As the first guest on the David Letterman Show in 1983, who knew where the pair would go.
The duo would share the screen again in 2014, along with a star of this generation, Lady Gaga.
5. In 1918, a French soldier whose face was mutilated in World War One had to be fitted with a prosthetic mask.
But in 2011, doctors carried out the first full face transplant on Dallas Wiens who lost all of his face in an accident.
6. In the first official gay pride march, London police had to be used for protection.
During the 2014 LGBT London pride parade though, marchers were flanked by supporters instead.
7. The first International match at Wimbledon had just a few dozen (rich) spectators in 1883.
Come today⌠and good luck getting a ticket.
8. The first Rockefeller Christmas tree on the construction site of the tower in 1931.
Today, itâs a little⌠different.
Dying to see more? Check out the next page for more eye candy!
9. In the 1903 first World Series, the Pittsburgh crowd swarmed the field and play continued.
Pretty sure that wouldnât fly today.
10. The first photo taken from space was strapped to a V2 rocket in 1946.
Pictures from space today are a little more⌠detailed.
11. The first climber to reach the summit of Everest was Sir Edmund Hillary in 1953.
Judging by the traffic today though, youâd guess it was commonplace.
12. The first World Cup final was held in 1930 in Montevideo, Uruguay. However, only 13 teams entered because of the difficulty of getting to South America at the time and thus Uruguay defeated Argentina 4-2.
In 2014, 209 countries were eligible to qualify.
13. With only 16 nations allowed to compete in the first modern Olympics (1896), only three men actually raced.
206 nations were in attendance during the 2012 London games.
14. The first neon light was installed in Vegas in 1941.
Which is a FAR cry from todayâs Sin City.
15. Western Berliners looked on as work began on the Berlin wall in 1961.
This past year, Berliners celebrated the anniversary of the wallâs fall, and marked itâs former path with illuminated balloons.
16. The first photograph of the moon, taken in 1839.
The first photograph of Earth taken from the moon in 1969.
A picture of both the Earth and moon from Chinaâs Changâe 5-TI satellite in 2014.
(via Distractify)
These photos are truly priceless. The advancements weâve made, the changes weâve seen⌠just make me excited to see what the future holds.
New Post has been published on Bee Trends
New Post has been published on http://www.beetrends.com/yeah-theres-a-difference-wells-fargo-scandal-is-another-reminder-that-we-cant-afford-trump-and-the-gop/
Yeah, there's a difference: Wells Fargo scandal is another reminder that we can't afford Trump and the GOP
Even as Republicans were striking poses of outrage during Tuesdayâs Senate hearing over Wells Fargoâs abuses of customers, they were pushing for measures that would terminate the federal governmentâs ability to root out bank abuses â like the ones discovered at Wells Fargo.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the brainchild of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, was instrumental to exposing the way that Wells Fargo employees opened unauthorized accounts under customer names in order to meet the companyâs impossible-to-meet sales goals. The CFPB discovered âthat employees opened roughly 1.5 million deposit accounts that may not have been authorized by consumers,â according to the agencyâs press release, and âemployees applied for roughly 565,000 credit card accounts that may not have been authorized by consumers.â Under the authority of the Dodd-Frank bill, the agency is fining the bank $100 million.
But Republicans want to kneecap the agency, even though in its five-year existence it has returned nearly $12 billion to victims of the financial industryâs malfeasance. Despite its high-profile victory over Wells Fargo, Republicans are still looking for excuses to destroy an agency that protects consumers and helps prevent some of the exploitative banking practices that led to the financial collapse of 2008.
âGenerally speaking, Democrats have been staunch defenders of Dodd-Frank and the CFPB,â Joe Valenti, the director of consumer finance for the Center for American Progress, told me over the phone.
If you look over the past few congressional budget bills, he continued, âevery single year, the Republicans have had some kind of measure that would weaken the CFPB.â He explained, âSome would take away its independent budget. Some would turn it into a commission. Some would block it from going after payday lenders or auto lenders or other types of predatory lenders.â
In June Republicans unveiled a plan to repeal the Dodd-Frank law and replace it with legislation that would defang the CFPB, making it the only bank regulator without independent funding. In other words, Republicans want to restructure the CFPB so they can quietly bleed it dry, making it an agency with no real enforcement power to protect consumers against predatory bankers.
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has promised that, if elected, he plans to dismantle Dodd-Frank altogether. Under his leadership, Republicans might skip the budget games altogether and simply eradicate the CFPB, which would give banks like Wells Fargo winking permission to return to unrestrained exploitation of their customers.
In contrast, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has been vocal in her support of the CFPB:
âThe unfair and abusive practices at Wells Fargo remind us that we need tough watchdogs looking out for customers,â Clinton wrote in an open letter to Wells Fargo customers. âThe CFPB worked with local authorities and enforced the law â assessing its highest penalty ever, and bringing the bankâs illegal activity into the national spotlight.â She promised not to let Republicans âput the CFPB under their thumb.â
Clinton has also proposed sweeping expansions of existing powers â ones that would make it harder for banks like Wells Fargo simply to pay their fines and return to business as usual.
During Tuesdayâs Senate hearings, Republicans continued to make disingenuous arguments, trying to portray the CFPB as a poorly managed organization that needs to be restructured.
During his opening remarks for the Senate Banking Committee hearing on the Wells Fargo fiasco, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., kept trying to pin blame for what went wrong on CFPB regulators.
âHow many millions of unauthorized accounts does it take before the CFPB notices?â Shelby said.
Shelby neglected to mention that if the Republicans got their way and CFPB were disempowered, the answer would be, âWho knows?â There would be no government agency tasked with investigating and putting a halt to Wells Fargoâs abuses in the first place.
âFinally, where were the federal regulators while certain Wells Fargo employees were taking advantage of unsuspecting customers over a period of many years?â Shelby went on.
One way to get rid of slow investigations, of course, is to make sure there are no investigations at all, much in the same way that death is a surefire cure for cancer.
The House Financial Services Committee hasnât even bothered to hold its own hearings about this. When a reporter confronted a spokesman for Rep. Andy Barr, R-Ky., who serves on the committee, he blamed the regulators themselves: âIt is ironic that supporters of Dodd-Frank claim the law protects consumers, when this alleged fraud occurred after the law went into effect.â
In a sense, itâs the same logic that Shelby is employing. It is technically true that one way to stop hearing about all the lawbreaking is to get rid of the people who actually catch the criminals. But putting the abuses in the closet does not stop them from happening, as much as Barr might like to think otherwise.
Most of the coverage of Tuesdayâs hearing focused on how awesome Sen. Warren is, and what a sleazemeister Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf is. Which is great, as it is clearly true that Warren is a badass and Stumpf is a monster.
But the hearing should also serve to remind us of the vast differences between the two parties and their respective presidential candidates, especially with regard to regulation of the financial industry.
To keep banks from destroying peopleâs lives, we need the CFPB and the Dodd-Frank law. Trump and the Republicans want to get rid of both. Clinton and the Democrats want to protect and even strengthen both.
There are countless reasons to fear a Trump ascendency to the White House. But not least among them is the fear that he, with the assistance of congressional Republicans, will lay waste to the economic regulatory system built up under President Barack Obama, just as itâs starting to work to make our economy secure again.
Updated: This article has been updated with direct quotes from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.