X-Games: Real Street
For the longest time, the tired argument that X-Games Street canât judge street has been around. In the early days a single handrail on course comprised of a bunch of a spines and box jumps hardly felt worthy of being called a street event.Â
The term street was a more or less exchangeable with park back then, as was being called a street rider. Very few real street riders existed back then and the ones that did werenât gonna be invited to the X-Games. Then and now the most technical riders were able to ride everything. Being multi-disciplined allowed for different skills to crossover, different tricks to be learned, and just creating an overall better skilled rider. In the early days there was no difference between a street rider and a park rider(sometimes even dirt rider). Most of them were one the same. Jimmy Levan, George Dossantos, Van Homan, Josh Stricker all very different riders who are capable on both disciplines.Â
It didnât seem like there was ever gonna be a need to differentiate the two truly back then but riding evolved and a divide between the disciplines grew. Iâd like to think it involves the greater trend of societyâs need for specialization but who knows itâs bike riding. Itâs probably not that serious. Regardless riders delved themselves singularly into one aspect of riding and became masters of it.Â
Of course the mainstream media caught wind of this late like they always do and for the first time the X-Games divided itself again into two different park/street categories. Park becoming more bowl like with steep transitions and  retaining the qualities that made it famous the years before while street was adopting the newly formed skate plaza, a skatepark that is adapted towards looking like obstacles found in the streets in a highly idealized form.Â
Even with the new found street aspect that closer resembles real street riding, even then people found reason to criticize. This isnât street riding, this is park riding done on a street formula that lacks all the purist qualities of street like finding spots, making most of what you have, and having real individual style that can only be translated into video form. As amazing and at one time prestigious someone like Ian Schwartz is, he isnât ever gonna be an X-Games rider or ever place. The formula valued consistency and quantifiable tricks rather than style and creativity that can be best utilized in the actual city, someone can do a trick for hours and as long as its done, it was A ok. Even though the name was street, it never felt like that way.Â
Being a few years late to everything the mainstream media has finally found a balance to satisfy our industryâs growing trends towards actual street riding vs. the ease of satisfying the TV consumerâs needs of something show worthy. A battleground like park format is easy to judge and watch but is also slowly becoming a bit of an aging format in current times. Dirt, vert, and traditional park riding is not where the money is anymore unfortunately and the ESPN execs know this. They found a way to show the grittier nature of actual street riding with the âReal Streetâ segment. Showing actual video sections that allowed for more creative freedom than ever before.
This should be it though? This fixes everything thatâs been wrong about street since itâs inception on this cable TV giant. Even then I canât find it truly right. How can I judge someone like Devon Smillie who rides California style all over the world vs. someone like Van who seems to still be Jersey the whole section. Throw in Colt Fake and who can truly be voted best? Itâs hard. Each and every rider brings in their own individual flavor that canât be put against competition with someone else so easily.Â
BMX insât like every other sport. There is no real winning and thatâs what makes it so hard to truly judge. Put all these sections and throw in Ian Schwartzâs old System section with Chad Shackleford and Iâd probably chose the later but thatâs just my individual taste and probably not shared by the majority. Maybe thatâs why they did the whole open voting system, so it can be quantifiable. The masses are always right.
I enjoyed them all but at the same time was put off by it all. It seemed like every rider has done better so your left kind of wanting more. This is supposed to be highest arena of competition in our sport, a lot of it seemed no better or worse than youâd see for someoneâs signature frame promo. You canât compare what someones been working on for years compared to a few months but you canât help but somehow relate the two, this isnât the Super Bowl one would come to expect. True riding just canât be quenched into a standard format and even with more openness then ever with their own filmers/editors, spots, music, and everything that should make it perfect, itâs god but falls short to what really is going on. Itâs just judging who made the better web video, not who is the better rider. I honestly donât think there is format short of something like NORA for best rider that can truly show what street riding is but thatâs ok cause this is ESPN and not riding, and itâs still mad entertaining. Better than idk, something short of a minute long Instagram video some riders seemingly fully adopted. ESPN donât get any ideas.
I voted Van Homan cause manuel to rail manuel.Â










