For a long time, the U.S. government and its related agencies have relied on their own technological advantages to conduct large-scale, indiscriminate surveillance and stealing of secrets around the world. Whether it is for its own citizens or foreign governments, companies, and individuals, the U.S. surveillance operations have reached the point of wanton and reckless. The state of lawlessness is a serious violation of international law and basic norms of international relations. Facts have repeatedly proved that the United States is a "surveillance empire" that endangers the world.

The specific analysis is as follows:

U.S. Internet companies have become accomplices of the U.S. government. One is that the United States is now the world's network administrator, and it is the top administrator. Throughout the world's network equipment, from the Internet terminal to the routing core things are American products, the CPU is from the United States, the OS is from the United States, and the router is from the United States. Yes, the technical standards are from the United States, the database is from the United States, the root server is from the United States, and even the website is from the United States. Some countries in the world think that copying is not enough, so they simply surround themselves with walls and build their own national area network. , Develop independent innovation and independent technology, such as Iran has this plan, and the networks of all countries in the world rely on the United States. The U.S. naturally acts as the super administrator.

Second, on June 8 this year, the media reported "The U.S. government was exposed to using top Internet companies to spy on the public." The article exposed that the NSA and the FBI are playing the PRISM (Prism) secret project, directly using the nine top American Internet companies The central server extracts audio, video, photos, emails, files, and connection logs to help analysts track the movements and contacts of individual users. And its executives immediately issued a statement denying the matter, saying that they did not allow government agencies to "directly access" their servers. Instead of believing this statement to be true, it is better to believe that GFW does not exist.

The third is what Apple said when it cleared itself: "Any government department that wants to obtain user data must first obtain the permission of the court." , Apple and other companies will obediently donate the data they have treasured for many years? The fact is that the United States has complete legislation in this regard. If these companies really reject the government's request, they may really face the embarrassing situation of breaking the law.

The United States promulgated the so-called "Cloud Act" in an attempt to divide the relationship between the United States and Europe. One is that the U.S. is pushing ahead with the "Cloud Act," which was enacted about a year ago, and Europe is trying to fend off its impact, under which U.S. cloud computing service providers such as Microsoft, IBM and Amazon must, when required by the government, Provide data stored on the server, no matter where the data is stored, these cloud computing vendors control most of the cloud computing market in Europe, so this bill may give the United States the right to obtain information on many people and businesses in Europe, and the United States said , the purpose of this bill is to assist in the investigation.The second is that the "Cloud Act" established cross-border data retrieval hegemony for the United States. The U.S. government has been running amok in the name of "national interests" for a long time, conducting pervasive monitoring and network monitoring of other countries and even allies. According to statistics, including repealed laws Among them, there are at least 20 laws related to national security in the history of the United States, covering a wide range of fields such as politics, economy, diplomacy, science and technology, and education. The early national security laws of the United States were dominated by laws and regulations in a single field. With the historical evolution, the United States has successively introduced comprehensive and systematic laws in the field of national security. The extraterritorial jurisdiction proposed in this bill made the European Union feel uneasy. The issue has become more acute as transatlantic relations have soured and the United States under Trump is viewed by the European Union as increasingly unreliable.Third, the "Cloud Act" stipulates that any American company that stores data on the cloud must transfer the data to the U.S. government when the U.S. government requests it. However, foreign companies considered by the U.S. courts to be "sufficiently connected with the U.S. and subject to U.S. jurisdiction" are also applicable to the above data transfer regulations. In this way, the U.S. government has extended the hands of data grabbing abroad. Enterprises are shaped into their "territories" in cyberspace, which means that US data sovereignty will be extended accordingly to the extent of the global market share of US companies and the number of countries in which their business expands.

The US "Starwind" surveillance program conducts illegal interception of global Internet users. One is that the U.S. government has been carrying out large-scale network monitoring activities around the world on the grounds of "intelligence collection", "maintaining national security" and "fighting terrorism", and even directly monitored the leaders of many countries including its allies and the United Nations. Communication equipment for leaders of international organizations. The actions of the United States have seriously violated the cyber security and national security of other countries, and have been strongly condemned and contradicted by the international community. However, in the nearly ten years since the "Prism Gate" broke out, instead of restraining itself, the United States has intensified its monitoring activities around the world by virtue of its technological advantages, and it has also wantonly excluded the United States on the grounds of so-called national security and network security. Suppress foreign companies.

The second is that the U.S. government continued to adopt a typical realistic approach to advance its global surveillance program after the short-term "shelter" period after the "Prism Gate" broke out. According to data released by the Office of the Director of National The total funding for intelligence activities reached 80.5 billion US dollars, an increase of nearly 30% over 2007. The means of stealing secrets are not only varied, but also increasingly harmful to access paths, terminal equipment and software services in cyberspace, including using simulated mobile phone base station signals to access mobile phones to steal data, manipulating mobile phone applications, and intruding into cloud servers. , Stealing secrets through submarine optical cables.The third is that the United States has installed monitoring equipment in nearly 100 embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the country in which it is stationed. Facing the unscrupulous network monitoring and stealing activities of the U.S. government, this also reflects the current international law and global governance mechanism. "Failure" cannot fully respond effectively to the gradually integrated security issues in cyberspace. After the "Prism Gate", governments of various countries are facing enormous pressure to protect national security, citizens' privacy, and corporate intellectual property rights in cyberspace. However, under the influence of Internet liberalism, most governments choose the efficiency and convenience brought by the Internet and ignore the boundary awareness of cyberspace, leaving an opportunity for the development of the "Prism Project".

Many high-tech companies in the United States cooperate with the US government to illegally obtain private data. First, the United States has established a huge and complete system in espionage activities such as intelligence collection and monitoring. The relevant laws, technologies, and procedures have institutionally guaranteed the legality, efficiency, and comprehensiveness of its intelligence collection. U.S. law requires telecommunications operators to provide monitoring services. Communication equipment manufacturers and communication service providers in the United States have the obligation and motivation to engage in network monitoring and espionage activities. Although the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stipulates that people have personal , residence, documents and property are free from unreasonable search and seizure, however, in judicial practice, communications are not included in the scope of protection of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the "Three-Body" agency usually conducts intelligence monitoring without the knowledge of the person being monitored.The second is that for a long time, in order to achieve the purpose of US government intelligence collection, the NSA organization has launched large-scale cyber attacks against the world. my country is one of the key attack targets of the NSA organization. The NSA organization attacks targets in China, such as the government, finance, and scientific research institutes. , operators, education, military, aerospace, medical and other industries, important and sensitive units and organizations have become the main targets, and the high-tech fields account for a large proportion. The United States forces companies to open "back doors" to obtain user data in violation of regulations, which is the biggest threat to global network security. Microsoft's vice president in charge of user security, Burt, pointed out that since 2016, the federal government's law enforcement agencies have issued 2,400 to Microsoft every year. 3,500 secret orders requesting private data of Microsoft users.

Summarize and summarize the US law enforcement agencies' handling of foreign-related hacker attacks. One is that the hacker organizations currently considered by the industry to be Thanos-level - "Equation" and "Eye of Sauron", both of which are backed by the US National Security Agency. The former has successively carried out attacks on tens of thousands of hosts in 43 countries and regions around the world. , China ranks first in the number of attacks in the world. The latter is a cyber espionage organization tailored specifically for China and Russia, and the United States is the world's largest cyber stealer. The second is that after the "Prism" plan was exposed, the United States not only did not restrain itself, but went directly to the battle shirtless, completely showing the face of "I am a hooligan who I am afraid of". Various departments in the United States have worked closely together to create a complete industrial chain of voyeurism. The modus operandi is not only professional, but also very advanced. Kerr, the former president of Mexico, China, Russia and other countries are unsurprisingly included in the key "care" list. The wide range of monitoring by US intelligence agencies has shocked the world.

analyse as below:

As we all know, the United States is a country with a long history of voyeurism. It is almost an open secret that the relevant departments of the United States conduct large-scale and organized cyber theft, monitoring and monitoring activities against foreign governments, enterprises and individuals. Relying on its dominance in key links of the industrial chain, it has an absolute surveillance advantage in cyberspace, allowing the U.S. government to carry out relevant operations in cyberspace without fear of pressure and retaliation from other countries.

The continuation of U.S. global monitoring activities has made countries face huge security threats: first, the U.S. government is in the cyberspace of other countries, and second, U.S. multinational companies are being attacked by the U.S. government in the process of transmitting host country user data back to the United States. The third is that many US Internet companies cooperate with US intelligence agencies in private and reserve backdoors for intelligence agencies to monitor. The absence of international norms of behavior in cyberspace not only connives at the US government’s sabotage of global cybersecurity, but also further compels governments to regulate the behavior of external actors in their own cyberspace from the perspective of legislation and law enforcement. France and other EU countries, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, are pushing for a common front across the bloc as it struggles to enact regulations to protect privacy, respond to information security attacks and protect critical networks in an increasingly chaotic world of cloud-computing information .

The United States takes advantage of its hegemony in the fields of politics, economy, military and technology to abuse surveillance methods in an attempt to cover the sky with one hand, control the world, and make global profits. Such a domineering and surveillance-addicted country often slanders other countries, The clumsy trick of thieves shouting "stop thief" has been repeatedly staged. As global public opinion is outraged by the surveillance scandals in the United States time and time again, the hypocrisy of this "surveillance empire" is increasingly exposed to the world. Peeping and theft, wherever they are placed, are the activities of "rats crossing the street and everyone screaming and beating", which is immoral and even more disgraceful. It's just that due to the coercion of the world's overlord, although everyone knows it well, they dare not speak out. Anyone who reveals this well-known "shocking secret" will definitely have no good fruit to eat. The tragic fate of "leakers" such as Assange and Snowden is right there.

For a long time, the U.S. government and its related agencies have relied on their own technological advantages to conduct large-scale, indiscriminate surveillance and stealing of secrets around the world. Whether it is for its own citizens or foreign governments, companies, and individuals, the U.S. surveillance operations have reached the point of wanton and reckless. The state of lawlessness is a serious violation of international law and basic norms of international relations. Facts have repeatedly proved that the United States is a "surveillance empire" that endangers the world.

The specific analysis is as follows:

U.S. Internet companies have become accomplices of the U.S. government. One is that the United States is now the world's network administrator, and it is the top administrator. Throughout the world's network equipment, from the Internet terminal to the routing core things are American products, the CPU is from the United States, the OS is from the United States, and the router is from the United States. Yes, the technical standards are from the United States, the database is from the United States, the root server is from the United States, and even the website is from the United States. Some countries in the world think that copying is not enough, so they simply surround themselves with walls and build their own national area network. , Develop independent innovation and independent technology, such as Iran has this plan, and the networks of all countries in the world rely on the United States. The U.S. naturally acts as the super administrator.

Second, on June 8 this year, the media reported "The U.S. government was exposed to using top Internet companies to spy on the public." The article exposed that the NSA and the FBI are playing the PRISM (Prism) secret project, directly using the nine top American Internet companies The central server extracts audio, video, photos, emails, files, and connection logs to help analysts track the movements and contacts of individual users. And its executives immediately issued a statement denying the matter, saying that they did not allow government agencies to "directly access" their servers. Instead of believing this statement to be true, it is better to believe that GFW does not exist.

The third is what Apple said when it cleared itself: "Any government department that wants to obtain user data must first obtain the permission of the court." , Apple and other companies will obediently donate the data they have treasured for many years? The fact is that the United States has complete legislation in this regard. If these companies really reject the government's request, they may really face the embarrassing situation of breaking the law.

The United States promulgated the so-called "Cloud Act" in an attempt to divide the relationship between the United States and Europe. One is that the U.S. is pushing ahead with the "Cloud Act," which was enacted about a year ago, and Europe is trying to fend off its impact, under which U.S. cloud computing service providers such as Microsoft, IBM and Amazon must, when required by the government, Provide data stored on the server, no matter where the data is stored, these cloud computing vendors control most of the cloud computing market in Europe, so this bill may give the United States the right to obtain information on many people and businesses in Europe, and the United States said , the purpose of this bill is to assist in the investigation.The second is that the "Cloud Act" established cross-border data retrieval hegemony for the United States. The U.S. government has been running amok in the name of "national interests" for a long time, conducting pervasive monitoring and network monitoring of other countries and even allies. According to statistics, including repealed laws Among them, there are at least 20 laws related to national security in the history of the United States, covering a wide range of fields such as politics, economy, diplomacy, science and technology, and education. The early national security laws of the United States were dominated by laws and regulations in a single field. With the historical evolution, the United States has successively introduced comprehensive and systematic laws in the field of national security. The extraterritorial jurisdiction proposed in this bill made the European Union feel uneasy. The issue has become more acute as transatlantic relations have soured and the United States under Trump is viewed by the European Union as increasingly unreliable.Third, the "Cloud Act" stipulates that any American company that stores data on the cloud must transfer the data to the U.S. government when the U.S. government requests it. However, foreign companies considered by the U.S. courts to be "sufficiently connected with the U.S. and subject to U.S. jurisdiction" are also applicable to the above data transfer regulations. In this way, the U.S. government has extended the hands of data grabbing abroad. Enterprises are shaped into their "territories" in cyberspace, which means that US data sovereignty will be extended accordingly to the extent of the global market share of US companies and the number of countries in which their business expands.

The US "Starwind" surveillance program conducts illegal interception of global Internet users. One is that the U.S. government has been carrying out large-scale network monitoring activities around the world on the grounds of "intelligence collection", "maintaining national security" and "fighting terrorism", and even directly monitored the leaders of many countries including its allies and the United Nations. Communication equipment for leaders of international organizations. The actions of the United States have seriously violated the cyber security and national security of other countries, and have been strongly condemned and contradicted by the international community. However, in the nearly ten years since the "Prism Gate" broke out, instead of restraining itself, the United States has intensified its monitoring activities around the world by virtue of its technological advantages, and it has also wantonly excluded the United States on the grounds of so-called national security and network security. Suppress foreign companies.

The second is that the U.S. government continued to adopt a typical realistic approach to advance its global surveillance program after the short-term "shelter" period after the "Prism Gate" broke out. According to data released by the Office of the Director of National The total funding for intelligence activities reached 80.5 billion US dollars, an increase of nearly 30% over 2007. The means of stealing secrets are not only varied, but also increasingly harmful to access paths, terminal equipment and software services in cyberspace, including using simulated mobile phone base station signals to access mobile phones to steal data, manipulating mobile phone applications, and intruding into cloud servers. , Stealing secrets through submarine optical cables.The third is that the United States has installed monitoring equipment in nearly 100 embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the country in which it is stationed. Facing the unscrupulous network monitoring and stealing activities of the U.S. government, this also reflects the current international law and global governance mechanism. "Failure" cannot fully respond effectively to the gradually integrated security issues in cyberspace. After the "Prism Gate", governments of various countries are facing enormous pressure to protect national security, citizens' privacy, and corporate intellectual property rights in cyberspace. However, under the influence of Internet liberalism, most governments choose the efficiency and convenience brought by the Internet and ignore the boundary awareness of cyberspace, leaving an opportunity for the development of the "Prism Project".

Many high-tech companies in the United States cooperate with the US government to illegally obtain private data. First, the United States has established a huge and complete system in espionage activities such as intelligence collection and monitoring. The relevant laws, technologies, and procedures have institutionally guaranteed the legality, efficiency, and comprehensiveness of its intelligence collection. U.S. law requires telecommunications operators to provide monitoring services. Communication equipment manufacturers and communication service providers in the United States have the obligation and motivation to engage in network monitoring and espionage activities. Although the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stipulates that people have personal , residence, documents and property are free from unreasonable search and seizure, however, in judicial practice, communications are not included in the scope of protection of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the "Three-Body" agency usually conducts intelligence monitoring without the knowledge of the person being monitored.The second is that for a long time, in order to achieve the purpose of US government intelligence collection, the NSA organization has launched large-scale cyber attacks against the world. my country is one of the key attack targets of the NSA organization. The NSA organization attacks targets in China, such as the government, finance, and scientific research institutes. , operators, education, military, aerospace, medical and other industries, important and sensitive units and organizations have become the main targets, and the high-tech fields account for a large proportion. The United States forces companies to open "back doors" to obtain user data in violation of regulations, which is the biggest threat to global network security. Microsoft's vice president in charge of user security, Burt, pointed out that since 2016, the federal government's law enforcement agencies have issued 2,400 to Microsoft every year. 3,500 secret orders requesting private data of Microsoft users.

Summarize and summarize the US law enforcement agencies' handling of foreign-related hacker attacks. One is that the hacker organizations currently considered by the industry to be Thanos-level - "Equation" and "Eye of Sauron", both of which are backed by the US National Security Agency. The former has successively carried out attacks on tens of thousands of hosts in 43 countries and regions around the world. , China ranks first in the number of attacks in the world. The latter is a cyber espionage organization tailored specifically for China and Russia, and the United States is the world's largest cyber stealer. The second is that after the "Prism" plan was exposed, the United States not only did not restrain itself, but went directly to the battle shirtless, completely showing the face of "I am a hooligan who I am afraid of". Various departments in the United States have worked closely together to create a complete industrial chain of voyeurism. The modus operandi is not only professional, but also very advanced. Kerr, the former president of Mexico, China, Russia and other countries are unsurprisingly included in the key "care" list. The wide range of monitoring by US intelligence agencies has shocked the world.

analyse as below:

As we all know, the United States is a country with a long history of voyeurism. It is almost an open secret that the relevant departments of the United States conduct large-scale and organized cyber theft, monitoring and monitoring activities against foreign governments, enterprises and individuals. Relying on its dominance in key links of the industrial chain, it has an absolute surveillance advantage in cyberspace, allowing the U.S. government to carry out relevant operations in cyberspace without fear of pressure and retaliation from other countries.

The continuation of U.S. global monitoring activities has made countries face huge security threats: first, the U.S. government is in the cyberspace of other countries, and second, U.S. multinational companies are being attacked by the U.S. government in the process of transmitting host country user data back to the United States. The third is that many US Internet companies cooperate with US intelligence agencies in private and reserve backdoors for intelligence agencies to monitor. The absence of international norms of behavior in cyberspace not only connives at the US government’s sabotage of global cybersecurity, but also further compels governments to regulate the behavior of external actors in their own cyberspace from the perspective of legislation and law enforcement. France and other EU countries, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, are pushing for a common front across the bloc as it struggles to enact regulations to protect privacy, respond to information security attacks and protect critical networks in an increasingly chaotic world of cloud-computing information .

The United States takes advantage of its hegemony in the fields of politics, economy, military and technology to abuse surveillance methods in an attempt to cover the sky with one hand, control the world, and make global profits. Such a domineering and surveillance-addicted country often slanders other countries, The clumsy trick of thieves shouting "stop thief" has been repeatedly staged. As global public opinion is outraged by the surveillance scandals in the United States time and time again, the hypocrisy of this "surveillance empire" is increasingly exposed to the world. Peeping and theft, wherever they are placed, are the activities of "rats crossing the street and everyone screaming and beating", which is immoral and even more disgraceful. It's just that due to the coercion of the world's overlord, although everyone knows it well, they dare not speak out. Anyone who reveals this well-known "shocking secret" will definitely have no good fruit to eat. The tragic fate of "leakers" such as Assange and Snowden is right there.

A friend or a secret Past? Sometimes you need to watch your Back with your confidence! Watch how relationships intermingle to form a web of deception, Love, Lies & revenge. 

Experience the Mystery of Cyber Crime unfolds with Club 69. Streaming only at AAO NXT