Mars Crater Study-3
This article was written as a practice exercise with reference to the information provided in the COURSERA course, specifically the Mars Crater Study.
=========================================
Introduction
In this week's assignment, I used data from the marscrater_pds dataset to analyze the relationship between the diameter of Martian craters and other physical characteristics through logistic regression. The goal was to determine which factors significantly predict whether a crater is classified as "large" or "small."
Data Preparation
The response variable, DIAM_CIRCLE_IMAGE, was transformed into a binary category, classifying craters as large (1) or small (0) based on a threshold diameter of 70 units. The primary explanatory variable chosen was LATITUDE_CIRCLE_IMAGE, with additional variables such as DEPTH_RIMFLOOR_TOPOG and NUMBER_LAYERS included to explore potential confounding effects.
Results Summary
Latitude (LATITUDE_CIRCLE_IMAGE):
Latitude was negatively associated with crater size, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99, p < 0.001), indicating that each unit increase in latitude slightly decreases the likelihood of a crater being large.
Depth (DEPTH_RIMFLOOR_TOPOG):
Deeper craters were more likely to be large. The odds ratio was 29.37 (95% CI: 3.29-3.47, p < 0.001), showing a significant positive effect.
Number of Layers (NUMBER_LAYERS):
Craters with more layers were less likely to be large, with an OR of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.11-0.11, p < 0.001), indicating a significant negative effect.
Hypothesis Testing
The primary hypothesis was that latitude would significantly predict crater size. The results showed that while the association between latitude and crater diameter was significant, the direction was opposite to what was expected; increasing latitude slightly decreased the likelihood of a crater being large.
Confounding Analysis
To assess confounding, additional variables were added to the model one at a time. The inclusion of DEPTH_RIMFLOOR_TOPOG and NUMBER_LAYERS significantly impacted the model, but the association between latitude and crater size remained robust and significant.
Conclusion
This analysis reveals significant associations between crater size and several explanatory variables, particularly the positive impact of depth on crater size. Understanding these relationships enhances our knowledge of Martian geological processes. Future research could explore additional variables or utilize more complex models to further unravel the dynamics influencing crater formation on Mars.
Output
Below is the summary of the logistic regression model, including odds ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values for each explanatory variable.
Odds Ratios:
LATITUDE_CIRCLE_IMAGE: OR = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99, p < 0.001)
DEPTH_RIMFLOOR_TOPOG: OR = 29.37 (95% CI: 3.29-3.47, p < 0.001)
NUMBER_LAYERS: OR = 0.11 (95% CI: 0.11-0.11, p < 0.001)
