#copei

eu amo o psicopata do hexa e vou defendelo 

olha sendo que é tUDO EUROPeu essas porra tá difícil mas acho que me restou a suécia ou a croácia de países que considero menos pau no cu (suécia/croácia tá lá ainda né produção?)

porém de presente n trouxeram nada né aff 

mano do céu eu to bem triste

View On WordPress

"Reformism places the insurrection in the sky of unattainable ideals. Exalting her verbally they try - in fact - to prevent others from preparing. In that disagreement, in that incoherence between ones counterrevolutionary political practice and their verbalism about a final insurrectional outcome, they seek to substantiate their eternal affirmation that “they lack conditions.” every time you try to move the process of political struggle forward, applying means not included in their very limited recipe book. This is basically limited to two things: a) in the economic level of the class struggle, the wage claim action, developed with the highest respect for bourgeois and therefore peaceful "legality"; b) at the political level, Parliamentarism, Electoralism, as a way to politically capitalize the results of the economic struggle. Confining your practice at all levels within the increasingly narrow frames of the bourgeois legality, reformism creates the conditions for its increasing integration into the system . It hinders and tries to prevent the development of the conditions for its destruction. It is obvious that if the program and the revolutionary project are not present guiding the practice and daily struggle at all levels, there will never be a process for a revolutionary outcome. The capitalist system will not be destroyed by following the rules of the game that are designed to ensure its continuity. That continuity is what contributes to maintaining the culture of those who agree to do only what bourgeois legality allows, that is, only what legality managed by the bourgeoisie recommends be done. So the reformist line can only arise in growing reformism, a growing backward step from the famous insurrectional outcome that they postpone for an indefinable "opportune moment". So they cannot formulate,nor do they want to, no strategic-military guidelines.By converting the idea of ​​the “proletarian insurrection” into myth, the reformists turn it into legitimating pretext for his counterrevolutionary practice, so useful to the system. Far from representing an alternative opposite to this, aimed at destroying it, such reformism becomes daily practice, in fact concrete and daily, in a way to "perfect" it, to correct it in its manifestations more extreme and visible injustice.It is important to insist on this, because the myth of an unfathomable future insurrection, sudden and miraculously emerged, without anyone preparing it, as a paradoxical end to a practice." -COPEI, by the Uruguayan Anarchist Federation, 1972.