#consistent progressivism

i have made this account mostly to track and post blogs bout my daily life and also to isolate myself from everything when things gets a bit heavy.

i won't be sharing a lot bout me as i don't really like the idea of people knowing me all too well. but i could share some of my obvious hobbies-

reading books.

making coffee.

drinking coffee.

writing.

listening to music.

regretting my existence.

(heavy on the last one). (no, jk). (or am i?).

my blogs will mostly be bout-

academics.

schedules.

hobbies & habits.

self-care & self-improvement.

and some other stuffs i haven't decided yet.

a few bits bout me-

i procrastinate to the point where it's not procrastinating anymore, it's denying.

i love coffee, the making of coffee, the smell of coffee, the taste of coffee, the after-feeling of coffee, the during-feeling of coffee, oh and coffee.

i mostly prefer being alone and i prioritize my peace before anything.

i love quiet hours of the day, especially with a mug of coffee and my playlist in my ears on full volume.

two radqueer ideologies that seem similar at face value due to their aesthetics but are actually starkly contrasted, quidditsm and consistent progressivism i think both of these provide an interesting and cohesive look at how radqueer liberation might be achieved so i made this chart to compare and contrast them

just to clarify i'm not taking a side on either of them, i just wanted to analyze them alongside each other

Hey all! I figured it'd be a good idea to post an article on the topic of consistent progressivism, since I know it's kinda a hot-button topic right now.

I haven't personally put myself into any of those spaces (not personally a big fan of Discord as a place for communities) but I've seen people like this article's author and others in the tags discuss it; this appears to be a good summary of it and arguments against it in any case!

Same Existence-Time Attracted (or Similar Existence-Time Attracted)

[ pt: SETA / Same Existence-Time Attracted (or Similar Existence-Time Attracted) ]

adjective ("I'm SETA")

A term similar to AAM and MAP referring to those who are exclusively or primarily attracted to those with the same or similar existence time as them. This attraction is not inherently queer, though it may be. Made for a headmate, and because the term "age" and associated chronophilias may feel inapplicable to progressives.

Correct. Nazism is “extreme racist or authoritarian views or behavior.” (Oxford Dictionaries)

The primary goal of Nazis is to create a “Volksgemeinschaft”. Which means the People’s Community, however the word was later turned to mean a cleansing of previous “inferior” races/ideologies/practices and to replace them with the Aryan. The Aryan was not only determined to be the “Master Race” by Adolf Hitler, but the Aryan was also characterizrd to be those who are dedicated to defending the Nazi party and political movement.

So, I did use the term Nazi correctly, if that is what you were trying to get at.

Consistent Progressivism prides itself on eliminating inferior beliefs or practices that they determine to be “Conservative”. And that is step 1 of Fascism (or as I say, Nazism). By them watering down and dehumanizing a group of people into a very wide term and to be used derogatory, is step 1.

Step 2 is to seek and assault, kill, hunt or destroy a large group of people. And for them, Consistent Progressives, this is a large part of their identity. They torture and exterminate people who identify as conservative or use “Conservative Languages/Practices”.

Now, step 2.5 is to change the definition of terminology in order for them to seem the most correct ideology and political class of people. And for Consistent Progressives, they did this by turning the definition of “Conservative” into something that benefits their party.

Their definition: “A political worldview defined by a broad category of ideas either implicitly or explicitly believing that people should be discriminated against because of their race, gender identity, pronouns, sexual identity, or anything else regarding their identity that does not harm others”

The true definition: “a person who is averse to change and holds traditional values.” (Oxford)

Along with step 2.5, they are against any other dictionary and discourage their followers from using dictionaries like Oxford and deem the usage as “Conservative” (see step 2)