Sep 10, 2015
Loading...
seen from United Kingdom
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Tunisia
seen from United States
seen from China
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Jerry Sandusky and the 6th and 7th Amendments
So, of course the 6th and 7th Amendments are cornerstone civil rights, but I’m not completely on board with this criminal defense atty’s perspective, RE Sandusky.
Biggest point is that Greenfield completely overlooks over some important issues. First, were the Sandusky victims allowed public anonymity? Why on earth would they publicly give their names when the law allows female rape victims to hide theirs? It’s a valid question. Were they not given the opportunity?
Second, yes, Sandusky is a coward, and a cad. Admittedly, this article came out slightly before the jury verdict was read, but still, Greenfield didn’t even posit is his point arguendo. Sandusky knew he was guilty, but he played the game anyway. If he had any shred of integrity left, he would have just owned up to his foul deeds.
All this said, I do agree with Greenfield that the 6th Amendment confrontation clause has been completely trashed by SCOTUS. Sandusky was certainly entitled to his trial. No question, there. And, he was certainly entitled to face his accusers. Again, a no brainer. Point is, there is a serious problem when alleged sex abuse victims are permitted to avoid confronting the defendant. It’s a double standard as applied to men versus women. And this is what Greenfield totally overlooks.